I'll believe it when I see it.
You'd think with all these finance officer's, we would be good at itWe can yell and scream at the TBS and PSPC all we want but the first step to fixing this is showing we are good fiscal managers with what we have now.
I don't blame TBS and PSPC when I see the shit we pull all the time. The problem is us.
I was recently shocked to find out they do zero training in procurement. Explains why they keep talking about multiple quotes for Standing Offers.CAF finance officers are trained as budget managers, not accountants. Most would be hard pressed to discuss why there is a chart of accounts and what it represents; are poor at differentiating between the four votes used by DND/CAF; and receive little to no formal training on the mechanics of government which is a sine qua non at the more senior levels (LCol+). A finance officer who can't discuss Main Estimates, Supplementary Estimates, and the Annual Reference Level Update isn't a finance officer.
You'd think with all these finance officer's, we would be good at it
There is sometimes confusion between Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements.
More fun is when a unit is geographically dispersed, and supported by multiple RDAOs, each of which has a different interpretation of the rules that they inflict. Requiring a LCol CO to report back on why that terrible, terrible Sgt Mat Mgt Tech doesn't have three quotes on hand after spending $9 on batteries is clearly an optimal use of everyone's time, right?
I was recently shocked to find out they do zero training in procurement. Explains why they keep talking about multiple quotes for Standing Offers.
Sounds like a FinO needs a bit more power to prevent stuff from going ahead if policy isn't followed.You have no idea how many times I have had or have witnessed LogOs get completely disregarded because the NWO or Inf O just didn't think they needed to follow that monetary or procurement policy.
And again, it gets picked up on the compliance inspection and it's all giggles and back slaps and don't do it again Billy tehehehe.
Oh, believe me, I know. The RDAO, on the other hand, had a different opinion.I understand you're point but generally you don't need three quotes for a 9$ PReq.
Sounds like a FinO needs a bit more power to prevent stuff from going ahead if policy isn't followed.
I would argue we do not let anyone fail, but I agree there is a culture of lacking accountability for anything that doesn't cause injury or death in the majority of situations. If you can't handle tax payer money properly, you shouldn't have access to it.No, people need to be held accountable for misuse of public funds.
Can't manage your units budge and procurement, doesn't sound to me like your ready for that next step. Back in the pool you go Billy.
The truth is we don't take Logistics/Procurement seriously. And we refuse to let operators and operations fail because of their disregard of Logistics. It's a vicious cycle.
I thought the whole point is that the negotiations/price comparisons had already been done. Just when I thought I knew what I was doing….There is serious debate around this. Before I went on this French course I conducted Supply compliance inspections on ships and we had two civilian auditors who looked after procurement. Magnificently detailed people.
I will tell you they read the FAM/PAM to state that SOA or not the quotes matrix must be followed.
It's the first Sunday of my March break so I don't have their references. But I too questioned it.
I thought the whole point is that the negotiations/price comparisons had already been done. Just when I thought I knew what I was doing….
BOOTFORGEN... entirely because it is the least bureaucratic thing we do WRT kitting out our people.
Hopefully the Russo-Ukrainian War is a wake up call that we can't take our sweet a** time any more, time to kick things into high gear. Select a fighter jet, if possible cut steel on the CSC, more LAVs, etc....And probably also Logistik Unicorp.
If there was only a way to provide the same type of service for field kit as well...
They are working on it: Operational Clothing & Footwear (OCFC2) (W8486-206245/A) - Buyandsell.gc.caAnd probably also Logistik Unicorp.
If there was only a way to provide the same type of service for field kit as well...
1.2.1 Summary Background
The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is responsible for protecting Canada and defending its sovereignty, defending North America and contributing to international peace and security. To carry out their responsibilities, CAF members must be equipped with operational clothing and footwear (OCF) that provides the necessary protection and operational mobility to conduct daily operations anywhere in the world.
OCFC2 builds on the existing Consolidated Clothing Contract (C3) model operating in DND today for dress and occupational / environment uniform commodities, offering assurance of a tried and proven business model which has evolved through the last 20 years.
For all items stipulated under contract, a prime vendor would be responsible for their acquisition, as well as inventory and distribution management and other services. This managed clothing solution (MCS) provides for the opportunity to develop a direct delivery system between the contractor and the individual military member. In addition, OCFC2 will allow for lower contract management and administrative overhead, lower inventory, improved acquisition cycles, improved response times for corrective actions and product improvement while allowing the apparel, textile and footwear industries to remain competitive, innovative and responsive.
1.2.2 Brief Description
The MCS will provide end-to-end management of the DND supply chain for Operational Clothing and Footwear (OCF), from acquisition and/or manufacturing to inventory management to distribution. It will include professional and design services as well as configuration management.
The successful bidder will supply DND with a complete supply chain management approach that encompasses program management services, professional services, manufacturing, warehousing and inventory management, order processing and management, and distribution and delivery.
The MCS will also provide an online Order Management System (OMS) for use by Authorized Users who will order items for Direct Delivery to the address of their choice.
National and international deliveries may be required by the successful Bidder; destinations will only be specified at time of order.