Sure, he has a stutter. He was able to overcome it. Now age is overcoming him. He'd be a real outlier if he wasn't experiencing cognitive decline with age - nearly everyone I know over mid-70s, and some who are a bit younger, have admitted to it.
Undoubtedly. Among other things, he sure gets angry easily, but it's difficult to tell whether it's any worse than it was 4 or 5 years ago.
Given his recent confusion between Nikki Haley and Nancy Pelosi I would say it is.
Your lousy at making assumptions and attributing bullshit to people. Go ahead and bitch me out for not knowing about a speech impediment. In the mean time keep your ridiculous extrapolation and cheap shots, about something that never happened, to yourself. I don't care if you like me, but don't talk shit about me. You can get your point across without lying.Why am I not surprised that you would find someone's childhood speech impediment funny?
You probably howled at the Chretien attack ad too.
So, you've never had a Freudian slip?
Are you saying Trump secretly has a hard-on for Nancy Pelosi?
Every word of this is calculated to make me throw up in my mouth, and I hadn’t done that yet this week- so thanks!
No, I overstated. Pretty much every commentator I've read has at some point - and usually more than once - made the admission. That doesn't apply to the anonymous multitudes. I suppose there are a lot of people who can't see what is in front of their nose, and very few who would lie about it.
I would raise that to at least 65. Match it with most retirement qualifiers.
So if a particular constituency has an effective and well liked MP you'd limit voters rights to continue to elect that person as their representative?
