This one graphic displays the utter ignorance of those who favored the losing candidate:
So, if you knew anything about the electoral college, you would know that they are based on two things:
1. The number of representatives in the House; and
2. The two senators in each state.
So, in Wyoming, they have 3 votes. This means they have 2 senators (like every other state) and 1 representative. In California, they have 55 votes, so that means they have 2 senators and 53 representatives.
Since each state is to be considered equal and since each state votes for President, the college isn't going away. If it goes away, then future candidates focus on the large urban centers and nowhere else. I mean, why campaign in Wyoming?
Also consider this: in 2000, the focus was on Florida, but the race was won in tiny West Virginia. Long considered a Democratic bastion, Mr Bush Jr campaigned there and got those five votes. If Mr Gore won West Virginia, then Florida would have been irrelevant.
So, back to California. First, you have to ignore two votes (each state gets them) and go with the votes that represent the people. Wyoming: 584, 153 to get one vote. California: 716, 981 to get one vote. Still a difference over over 132,000, but in a federation where states are equal, you're not going to change that without giving California more districts. But I suppose they could go to 66 districts and call it even.