• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Stupid Procurement Ideas

Yes... for the Militia

But to be maintained & looked after by the RCR Battle school
 
There is no RCR Battle School, that ended in 1997

http://thercr.ca/history/RCR_timeline_20nov07_1MB.jpg
 
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.  OK, I can understand us getting Imperial Star Destroyers for Strategic Space Lift, and AT-ST's for Recce, now what about light sabres for infantry?
 
That's right Michael.... just as there are no Star Destroyers ;)

However, I do know that,
R22R, RCR & PPCLI Battle Schools were used as the foundation for Area Training Centres.
 
Panzer Grenadier said:
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.  OK, I can understand us getting Imperial Star Destroyers for Strategic Space Lift, and AT-ST's for Recce, now what about light sabres for infantry?

Hey - don't get greedy.  The printing presses can only churn out Crunchy Bucks so fast!
 
Panzer Grenadier said:
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.  OK, I can understand us getting Imperial Star Destroyers for Strategic Space Lift, and AT-ST's for Recce, now what about light sabres for infantry?

it's going to be a bayonet attachment for our new blasters
41ZOAci2hfL._AA280_.jpg
 
Crunchy Bucks? I thought we were using Monopoly Money?   ;D

Pte.Butt said:
it's going to be a bayonet attachment for our new blasters
41ZOAci2hfL._AA280_.jpg

Light sabres would be scarier. Plus, you can design something to stop a blaster, light sabres can only be stopped by other light sabres.
 
Panzer Grenadier said:
Crunchy Bucks? I thought we were using Monopoly Money?  ;D

Light sabres would be scarier. Plus, you can design something to stop a blaster, light sabres are Unstoppable!!!

Well just like the old bayonet, you can use it for when things get dirty!
 
Michael O`Leary said:
There is no RCR Battle School, that ended in 1997

http://thercr.ca/history/RCR_timeline_20nov07_1MB.jpg

Didn't you mean to say, "There is no The RCR Battle School, that ended in 1997"?

;D

G2G
 
Good2Golf said:
Didn't you mean to say, "There is no The RCR Battle School, that ended in 1997"?

;D

G2G

But that would be grammatically awkward, and I wouldn't want to be accused of being pedantic to a fault.  Perhaps I should have stated"

The RCR Battle School no longer exists, it was stood down in 1997.
 
...or:

The Battle School of The RCR no longer exists, it was stood down in 1997.

Much better, both Regimentally and grammatically.  ;)
 
zipperhead_cop said:
Ah.  So the Star Destroyers are going to Meaford.   :P

And Each Reserve unit looses several AT-AT's to the CMTC in Wainwright....  :P
 
Guns that shoot bees would make a great alternative to TASERS.
 
Managed readiness will not be a viable option for Star Destroyers, since they must remain in orbit while the depot is in Montreal. TD and travel allowance will rise to prohibitive levels, or excessive levels of PLD will have to be paid, which will attract negative attention from the Dark Side of the Treasury Board..........

As for MI powered battle armour, CLS will be issuing trial versions real soon now. Please note that the placement of the "Y" racks, flamers and plasma rifles was designed according to scientific principles, and intensive user "self criticism" and "re education" will be invoked to ensure the kit is used correctly in the field.  :o
 
So in all this fray whats the Air Force getting to replace the Hornets? X-Wings or TIE Fighters?
 
davidhmd said:
** Nerd Alert **

Y-Wings... this is Canada... nothing can be the newest generation of anything.

Y-Wings? we would be lucky to get A-Wings
 
Thucydides said:
Managed readiness will not be a viable option for Star Destroyers, since they must remain in orbit while the depot is in Montreal. TD and travel allowance will rise to prohibitive levels, or excessive levels of PLD will have to be paid, which will attract negative attention from the Dark Side of the Treasury Board..........

As for MI powered battle armour, CLS will be issuing trial versions real soon now. Please note that the placement of the "Y" racks, flamers and plasma rifles was designed according to scientific principles, and intensive user "self criticism" and "re education" will be invoked to ensure the kit is used correctly in the field.  :o

That's BS, looks like I'll be after an off the shelf Marauder Suit that is modular, unlike the issed piece of crap, these folks at CTS never learn !! If I say I need 3 Y racks I mean 3 not the 2 that are issued!!!
 
JBoyd said:
Y-Wings? we would be lucky to get A-Wings

We would be lucky to get A-Wings, given their speed and agility.  They may not have the firepower of the Y-Wings, but that is what orbital bombardment is for.  You really want to go into combat with a flying artillery piece, or something that is the starfighter version of a ninja? 
 
Back
Top