• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Stupid Procurement Ideas

Just a Sig Op said:
No, it's because you people aren't realistic. Buckets... trout... oooh... I bet we could even make said vehicles wheeled with the weight savings by cutting the pool. Who needs tracks when you can have cheap wheels?

You can NOT be freakin' serious !! Cut the pools, ergo the sharks. D'uh.  ::)

After all, we are at war !! Think principles -- think surprise!!





 
Ok lets ease up on the guy.

Honestly he has a awesome idea.And to help him out a little I suggest we buy the 500 tanks but we only crew 250 of them.With the tanks we buy some a frames and tow one tank behind each vehicle.That way when one bites the dust we just unhook our new tank and off we go.Half the fuel,parts and man power.

...now to pratice backing into our hide positions...
 
X-mo-1979 said:
Ok lets ease up on the guy.

Honestly he has a awesome idea.And to help him out a little I suggest we buy the 500 tanks ....

PERFECT!!!

500 FISH tanks ... for my 2400 sharks!  ;D
 
Actually vern we'll cut the numbers down on the sharks.The driver is responsable to move the sharks to the spare c/s in the event of having to bail from the original.

Were trying to save money here.

GET WITH IT! ;)
 
And the sharks can be nasty sometimes too, especially when outfitted with frickin' laserbeams.

I can't believe that you guys are cutting them on me.

This thread is waaaaaaay outta my lane. I'll stick to snowshoes -- with laser beams.
 
Though I can't imagine any of us would be less brusque if we had laser sharks...
 
Just a Sig Op said:
Though I can't imagine any of us would be less brusque if we had laser sharks...

- "Politics is the art of the possible".  Laser Sharks are to aggressive.  Also, there are the animal rights whack-jobs to contend with.  Then, once the FemiNazis find out that only FEMALE sharks are tempermentally suited for this duty, Ottawa grinds to a halt.

- Nope.  The Feds would have an easier time winning an election after leasing American B-52s and having them stand 'Q' fully nuked at Malton and Dorval Airports.
 
TCBF said:
The Feds would have an easier time winning an election after leasing American B-52s and having them stand 'Q' fully nuked at Malton and Dorval Airports.

Paint the bombs blue with a big white "UN" on them and call it "peacekeeping standby alert"
 
Man the best columns happen when im at work...

IM all for the sharks with the freakin' laser beams attached to their heads. Imagine a shark with JIHAD THIS!! tattooed on his stomach. Though why use them in land? We make a sort of SCUBA system with a salt additive that takes in water and makes salt water and the perfect living conditions for the shark. Second we develop some sort of system that mounts on the sharks head giving them intelligence (think BORG from star trek) and have them patrol the waters around Canada. Finally give them steel tooth covers so they can bite the hulls of all boats that oppose us and make the laser beam second as a AA platform (US Avenger anyone?). Shark surfaces and the airplane gets it. They can be monitored and work closely with AESOPs. Heck they can even do the recon underwater and just forward coordinates to the Sea Kings. Saves fuel-no more hunting! As well im sure all of Atlantic Canada wouldnt mind giving up fishing as all those natural resources (being the fish and such) are then property of DND. As for the arctic well all the aircraft that dont have to patrol the Atlantic due to the Sea Knights (get it Sea King and Sea Knight?) presence there (ok im sure CDN Aviators gonna tear into me for that one).

Though I wouldnt suggest using them in a SARTECH role... just something about a shark with a laser beam on his head showing up to give you a hand...I dont know about you guys but I can see the NDP having a field day with that one.

 
 
Rayman said:
(ok im sure CDN Aviators gonna tear into me for that one).


 

Oh no.  I'm a seized-wing guy so i dont care what you say about rotorheads realy.  And besides, have you read this thread ?
 
CDN Aviator said:
Oh no.  I'm a seized-wing guy so i dont care what you say about rotorheads realy.  And besides, have you read this thread ?

Yeah... I did why?
 
Rayman said:
Yeah... I did why?

I think we have moved well beyond anything serious so no, i wont tear you a new one unless you say something realy stupid and actualy mean it.
 
No...none of that was serious. I just saw the Aurora is it? In your avatar and figured youd be pissed if you had to fly over the arctic where its freezing cold.
 
While I appreciate what you are all trying to do with the sharks, I must point out that the concept is all screwed up.  Only mutant sea bass can operate for prolonged periods out of the water, and they are angrier than sharks.  Additionally, removing them from our oceans can be argued as an environmental remediation, so it sits better with the green crowed that would using sharks.
 
Rayman said:
No...none of that was serious. I just saw the Aurora is it? In your avatar and figured youd be pissed if you had to fly over the arctic where its freezing cold.

I think they come with windows that close now. 
 
zipperhead_cop said:
I think they come with windows that close now. 

:rofl:

Rayman said:
No...none of that was serious. I just saw the Aurora is it? In your avatar and figured youd be pissed if you had to fly over the arctic where its freezing cold.

Patrolling the Arctic is part of my job. The cold water up there will kill me just as quick and the water out in my other patrol areas. Besides, Yellowknife has some realy good bars and a chinese restaurant that serves the biggest egg rolls i have ever seen.
 
MCG said:
While I appreciate what you are all trying to do with the sharks, I must point out that the concept is all screwed up.  Only mutant sea bass can operate for prolonged periods out of the water, and they are angrier than sharks.  Additionally, removing them from our oceans can be argued as an environmental remediation, so it sits better with the green crowed that would using sharks.

Would we wreak the wrath of the Left, Greenpeace, PETA and the feminazis if we fed those mutant seabass turbot?  ???
 
CDN Aviator said:
Patrolling the Arctic is part of my job. The cold water up there will kill me just as quick and the water out in my other patrol areas. Besides, Yellowknife has some realy good bars and a chinese restaurant that serves the biggest egg rolls i have ever seen.

Do they have an all-you-can-eat buffet? Perhaps we can cut the costs of feeding my sharks by forking over the $9.95 per shark and stuffing them full of turbot-n-mutant bass stuffed giant eggrolls?
 
Sharks just aren't Canadian enough.

I was thinking seals. With satchel charges. On our ice.

Failing that we could always feed 'em to the sharks.
 
Back
Top