- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 410
Journeyman said:Hey, that could be a catchy..... bumper sticker. :stirpot:
;D
Journeyman said:Hey, that could be a catchy..... bumper sticker. :stirpot:
;D
If the shoe fits.Jarnhamar said:Yup. You're certainly helping with it.
Jarnhamar said:Maybe we should stop talking about trump in Canadian politics unless it's directly related to policy and affecting Canada.
I'll stop you right there.PuckChaser said:The intense desire of the Liberal and NDP parties in Canada to try to shoehorn Conservative leaders...
Great point, Puckchaser.PuckChaser said:The intense desire of the Liberal and NDP parties in Canada to try to shoehorn Conservative leaders into "evil American Republican" comparisons is just an attempt at character assassination and to control the media message about those Tory leaders. It happened with Harper as he was constantly compared to Bush Jr, Ford to Trump, and Scheer to being "evil Harper lite". It's the same identity politics that the left uses to control the vote right down to the smallest sub-sub-sub minority. Its almost at the point of Goodwin's law, where if you bring out a Trump comparison, you've just jumped the shark on any credibility your arguments had.
Mike: It's incredibly hard to figure out whether you're agreeing or disagreeing when you're posting a non-committal one liner and a Google link that looks at quick glance that you're agreeing with Altair.
PuckChaser said:The intense desire of the Liberal and NDP parties in Canada to try to shoehorn Conservative leaders into "evil American Republican" comparisons is just an attempt at character assassination and to control the media message about those Tory leaders. It happened with Harper as he was constantly compared to Bush Jr, Ford to Trump, and Scheer to being "evil Harper lite". It's the same identity politics that the left uses to control the vote right down to the smallest sub-sub-sub minority. Its almost at the point of Goodwin's law, where if you bring out a Trump comparison, you've just jumped the shark on any credibility your arguments had.
Mike: It's incredibly hard to figure out whether you're agreeing or disagreeing when you're posting a non-committal one liner and a Google link that looks at quick glance that you're agreeing with Altair.
PuckChaser said:Mike: It's incredibly hard to figure out whether you're agreeing or disagreeing when you're posting a non-committal one liner and a Google link that looks at quick glance that you're agreeing with Altair.
Underway said:Why isn't Trump compared to Rob Ford? Lets be honest, this whole thing started in TO blew into the US and then blew back here... To think we haven't been populist is ignorant of our history.
Some did compare Trump to Rob Ford during the primaries.Underway said:Why isn't Trump compared to Rob Ford? Lets be honest, this whole thing started in TO blew into the US and then blew back here... To think we haven't been populist is ignorant of our history.
As for those who regret not signing up to vote, don't worry about it. I tried, they took my money and didn't mail me my login/password info in time, like thousands of others. Pathetic. Green it is this year, at least they have some conservative policies in their platform.
I can understand how it may seem that way to an ardent Trump supporter -- you know, the type who sees absolutely no incongruity between using "Trump" and "credibility" in the same sentence (that whole stunning track-record of compulsive lying; policy reversals; mindless tweets; saying 'A' but then when it sinks in even with him how incredibly stupid it was, catagorically states "I never said 'A' "....).PuckChaser said:...... if you bring out a Trump comparison, you've just jumped the shark on any credibility your arguments had.
Altair said:Oh, and lying through their teeth.
WeatherdoG said:
It will be interesting to see how the PCs deal with the inevitable comparisons between the POTUS and Ford. I imagine their best strategy would be to ignore the comparisons and focus on the Liberal's track record on the economy.
Political A does something.recceguy said:Which is what we're going to deal with here. Back on track folks and keep it relative to the point of the thread. ONTARIO Politics. Comments like "That guy down south" add nothing to the conversation except tangents. Save yourself the typing if they don't contribute to the discussion. They'll likely be removed anyway. Comparing Scheer to anyone requires a point to be made that is relevant. Stating only "Ford is just like <name here>" won't cut it.
Tanks!
Altair said:Political A does something.
Politician B does something similar.
If politician B isn't in the same jurisdiction as politician A should it not be mentioned that those two politicians have done similar things in the past?
It was simply a question.recceguy said:Is anyone else having problems understanding what my Staff post meant? I thought it was pretty clear.
Annnnnnnnd since people like to be passive agressive via milpoints, for example, could one compare;Altair said:It was simply a question.