- Reaction score
- 2,082
- Points
- 1,160
SeaKingTacco said:It strikes me that most of the problems associated with various Canadian elections in recent years have been caused by the manner in which most parties now select leaders. It used to be that either caucus voted, or there was a delegated vote. This direct election of a leader by anyone with a party membership seems to be the source of a lot of abuse, corruption and outright fraud.
Infanteer said:Yes, isn't it. I always thought caucus voting was the better option, as the party could avoid the hucksters. You do run the risk of coup/counter-coup as the Aussies have, but that isn't as bad as the crap that seems to tarnish every party election.
Infanteer said:Yes, isn't it. I always thought caucus voting was the better option, as the party could avoid the hucksters. You do run the risk of coup/counter-coup as the Aussies have, but that isn't as bad as the crap that seems to tarnish every party election.
Toronto, May 24th - In a random sampling of public opinion taken by The Forum Poll™ among 906 Ontario voters, amongst those decided and leaning almost half of Ontarians (47%) say that they would support the NDP. A third (33%) say they would support the PCs, and one-sixth (14%) say they would support the Liberals. Few (4%) say they would support either the Green Party, or another party (2%).
ModlrMike said:Yes, because the best thing for Ontario is to drift even further left. :facepalm:
Remius said:Yeah, and if they only manage a minority they will be propped up by what's left of the LPO and wil essentially just be a continuation of liberal policies...
The ideal scenario for me is a minority PC government. But that may not happen if trends keep up.
Maybe not, but I don't think Ontario was ready for a lurch to the right.ModlrMike said:Yes, because the best thing for Ontario is to drift even further left. :facepalm:
Altair said:Instead, faced with Ford, people would rather the NDP, the same bad ideas as the liberals, less baggage.
Remius said:Most millenials and younger gen x cohorts (who may be behind the NDP surge) don't really remember that. 25 years ago plus, last century, before social media etc etc.
Good2Golf said:...other than 1990-1995...
The memories of the 1990 election — and the subsequent five years of Rae's NDP government — are beginning to fade. Millennials will be the biggest cohort of eligible voters in this election, and even the oldest among them would have been roughly 15 years old when Rae's government was defeated in 1995.
About a sixth of the Ontario electorate today wasn't even been born yet in 1990, nearly a quarter were barely out of diapers and over 2 million Ontarians came to Canada as immigrants after 1990.
So for a significant portion of voters, Ontario's only NDP government is a history lesson rather than a lived experience. Those voters who might be negatively influenced by memories of the early 1990s would be predisposed already to shun the New Democrats. The party traditionally has struggled to win support among older voters, so it's difficult to separate the tendency of those voters to eschew the NDP from any lingering memories of 'Rae Days'.
Altair said:http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-ontario-1990-election-1.4675425
Yeah, I don't think that matters much for a great deal of people.
Good2Golf said:They'll get a refresher with "Social Contract #2"... :nod:
Good2Golf said:They'll get a refresher with "Social Contract #2"... :nod: