I'll believe it when I see it.
I thought Clinton was in the National Guard to get out of going to Vietnam?A pre-requisite for public office is military service...
Generals as Presidents?
Washington
Eisenhower
Grant
Jackson
Harrison
Hayes
Garfield
Pierce
Arthur
Johnson
Harrison
If we include Brigadiers.
List of presidents of the United States by military rank - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The list of Presidents with no military background is shorter - than the list of those with military service ,
Adams
Quincy Adams
Van Buren
Cleveland
Wilson
Harding
Coolidge
Hoover
FDR (he had a good excuse)
Clinton
Obama
Trump
Biden
Pretty sure it George Bush jr who was in the air national guard.I thought Clinton was in the National Guard to get out of going to Vietnam?
Also, the list excluded Teddy Roosevelt.
* Oops I see that list is specifically for generals. Never mind.
And 3 ,2 stars, about 9 Cols etc etc!Only if we make a new two star the chair... The solution to all the CAF's problems is creating a new two star job.
The King's troops were composed of 28 captains, 28 lieutenants, 28 ensigns en pied, 28 ensigns en second, 28 cadets à l'aiguillette, and 784 soldiers.
1736 | Company | |
Companies | 28 | 1 |
Captains | 28 | 1 |
Lieutenants | 28 | 1 |
Ensigns en pied | 28 | 1 |
Ensigns en second | 28 | 1 |
Cadets a l'aiguillette | 28 | 1 |
Soldiers | 784 | 28 |
Well that does at least match the age of some of our kit...BTW, considering the thread you posted this in, are you proposing that Trudeau junior should boost Canada's defence spending by investing in French Compagnies Franches de Marine of the 1760 era?
Flying a Thud that did not have a enviable safety record either.Pretty sure it George Bush jr who was in the air national guard.
Clinton said he would join ROTC to avoid the draft but something about his number meant he wouldn’t be drafted or something like that. I don’t think he followed through though.
Pretty sure it George Bush jr who was in the air national guard.
Clinton said he would join ROTC to avoid the draft but something about his number meant he wouldn’t be drafted or something like that. I don’t think he followed through though.
My recollection of the draft goes back to the late 1960s when I was eligible.
With the end of active U.S. ground participation in Vietnam, December 1972 saw the last men conscripted, who were born in 1952 and earlier.
As an American citizen one must still register for selective service prior to one’s 18th Birthday, or if naturalized under 35 must register.Not sure if there is a similar method in place should the U.S. draft be reinstated.
You are extrapolating that this is for one/twenty-eight company(ies) of troops because 784 divides into exactly 28. The census merely mentions that the King's troops in New France consisted of these numbers. For all we know, most of the officers may have been in the direct entourage of the Governor as military advisors/general staff. An actual order of battle would be useful.
BTW, considering the thread you posted this in, are you proposing that Trudeau junior should boost Canada's defence spending by investing in French Compagnies Franches de Marine of the 1760 era?
Under SSE, his government committed to growing the full time CAF by thousands.If Trudeau invested in 28 platoons of anything I would consider it a win.
Under the French Regime, the Captain were elected by the male of the Seigneurie. He had admin function other than the milicia and was answering to the Seigneur. Basically a big village was a Seigneurie.Stumbled across this factoid in my meanderings:
1737 New France
1736Company Companies 28 1Captains 28 1Lieutenants 28 1Ensigns en pied 28 1Ensigns en second 28 1Cadets a l'aiguillette 28 1Soldiers 784 28
Yes, and no. The CAF needs to fix the recruiting process, but TB sets compensation and benefits, and the GoC imposes other restrictions as well.Under SSE, his government committed to growing the full time CAF by thousands.
That the CAF has failed to do so lies on the CAF.
Yes, and no. The CAF needs to fix the recruiting process, but TB sets compensation and benefits, and the GoC imposes other restrictions as well.
Just last year a recruiter told the media he had maximum numbers of males he could recruit. Despite the severe shortage of personnel, the GoC and CAF are persisting in making joining an unwelcoming process to some Canadians.
The CAF has been told to fill a pool, but has been denied pumps, buckets, and instead has been given a slotted serving spoon.
Actually it sounds like they may actually have a few too many "tools".A few months ago I went ionto a local CFRC looking for some pamphlets or other up to date info for the son of a friend.
Trying to get in, I was treated like a criminal. Standing there awkwardly in an almost empty office, fielding glares from an angry Sgt who was looking after the only other guy in there, I gave it 15 minutes then had to leave to make a meeting on time. Empty handed. After the worst customer service experience of my recent life (and I've been to the UK recently).
I think they need more than a few tools
I seems the CAF has at least one....I think they need more than a few tools
I think selection for recruiting needs to be taken away from Career Managers, and handled by CFRG themselves. Make it a selection process, and reward those who choose to be selected.A few months ago I went ionto a local CFRC looking for some pamphlets or other up to date info for the son of a friend.
Trying to get in, I was treated like a criminal. Standing there awkwardly in an almost empty office, fielding glares from an angry Sgt who was looking after the only other guy in there, I gave it 15 minutes then had to leave to make a meeting on time. Empty handed. After the worst customer service experience of my recent life (and I've been to the UK recently).
I think they need more than a few tools