D
Don2wing
Guest
But sometimes we buy concepts say like the Cyclone. I just want us to be consistent in these matters when there are dollars at stake.
Don2wing said:But sometimes we buy concepts say like the Cyclone. I just want us to be consistent in these matters when there are dollars at stake.
Don2wing said:Yes, of course but else is to be flying this aircraft?
Don2wing said:But sometimes we buy concepts say like the Cyclone. I just want us to be consistent in these matters when there are dollars at stake.
Don2wing said:But sometimes we buy concepts say like the Cyclone. I just want us to be consistent in these matters when there are dollars at stake.
Don2wing said:But sometimes we buy concepts say like the Cyclone. I just want us to be consistent in these matters when there are dollars at stake.
Don2wing,Don2wing said:I am not suggesting that the majority of planes purchased by DND be built in Canada as in the 1950's but that a lowly transport plane could be built in Canada. This is not just about keeping up with the Jones and their cars rather more the economic development of Canada. Other countries such as the United States use their military purchases for the development of their industrial base and companies to allow American companies to be leaders in the world in those sectors.
So are we followers or leaders?
CDN Aviator said:Who fucking cares ?
What does the CH-148 have to do with FWSAR and the non-existence of the DHC-5NG ?
MCG said:Don2wing,
Your plea attempts to leverage peoples’ emotions and patriotism, but it also ignores realities to the point that it grossly misrepresents the situation. The government of Canada does not need to buy a Canadian built plane in order to develop Canadian industrial base. In fact, it has been shown that throwing defence dollars into establishing/propping-up a business does not work. When the contract with DND runs its course, the business is left with nothing to sustain itself, and it goes under (in the case of major systems such as vehicles or aircraft, this creates a situation where DND must now live with grossly inflated lifecycle costs related to a system with no industrial support).
I recommend you look into the reality of IRBs. They see winning vendors obligated to spend the equivalent of the contracts full dollar value on work in Canada. This reinforces independently viable elements already within in our industry. It makes a lot more sense.
http://forums.milnet.ca/forums/threads/83535.0.html.
Don2wing said:This is not just about keeping up with the Jones and their cars rather more the economic development of Canada.
CDN Aviator said:This isnt about keeping up with the Jones or economic development.
This is about equiping our SAR units with what they need to ******* SAVE LIVES !
On this note, if the intent is to save lives, why are we still basing a/c in southern Canada with such great distances to cover to the north and also to the east coast. None of the candidate a/c offer a transit time of less than 4 hours and that is a lot of time. It seems ludicrous to ridicule the Buff with its 180 knot speed when the c27 is still going to take forever to respond. Maybe more, less capable aircraft located in multiple locations is better than better a/c in centralized locales.
YZT580 said:CDN Aviator said:This isnt about keeping up with the Jones or economic development.
This is about equiping our SAR units with what they need to ******* SAVE LIVES !
On this note, if the intent is to save lives, why are we still basing a/c in southern Canada with such great distances to cover to the north and also to the east coast. None of the candidate a/c offer a transit time of less than 4 hours and that is a lot of time. It seems ludicrous to ridicule the Buff with its 180 knot speed when the c27 is still going to take forever to respond. Maybe more, less capable aircraft located in multiple locations is better than better a/c in centralized locales.
Maybe more, less capable aircraft located in multiple locations is better than better a/c in centralized locales.