• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Chinese Military,Political and Social Superthread

Telegraph



Carrots for Liberals. Sticks for Tories.


China strong-arming British Tory MPs - including Ian Duncan Smith - past Leader of the Opposition and the Conservative Party.

Method of intervention -

Threatening to withdraw funding from a school if it admits his daughter.

A Tory MP’s child allegedly had their university application jeopardised amid warnings Chinese funding would be pulled from the institution, while the child of one politician was knocked off course when they were blocked from travelling with a Chinese airline.

Iain Duncan Smith, a former Conservative Party leader, told The Telegraph he believed Beijing was keeping tabs on his family members’ movements while Alicia Kearns, a fellow critic of the regime, said she would not rule this out as China would “want us to feel watched”.

The senior Tory MP also said she knew of one colleague whose child’s study plans had been thrown into disarray because their parent was a politician who had been sanctioned by the Chinese state. She said the prospective student’s university bid was threatened when the institution in question was warned all Chinese funds would be withdrawn if they accepted the application.

It has also been claimed that one politician’s child ran into trouble after being assigned a flight with a Chinese airline when their original journey was cancelled.
They were allegedly barred from getting on the plane for the replacement trip because of their surname.

The claims have emerged as The Telegraph spoke to five prominent China critics in Westminster – four Tory MPs and one crossbench peer – about the pressures they believe they are under to keep quiet.




China accused of targeting MPs and their families in intimidation campaign​

Critics of President Xi’s regime tell of children’s university applications being jeopardised and abuse on social media

ByAmy Gibbons16 April 2023 • 8:29pm

Iain Duncan Smith

Iain Duncan Smith believes Beijing is keeping tabs on him CREDIT: Rii Schroer
Prominent Conservative critics of China have revealed their fears that Beijing is monitoring their families as part of an intimidation campaign aimed at deterring them from speaking out.
A Tory MP’s child allegedly had their university application jeopardised amid warnings Chinese funding would be pulled from the institution, while the child of one politician was knocked off course when they were blocked from travelling with a Chinese airline.
Iain Duncan Smith, a former Conservative Party leader, told The Telegraph he believed Beijing was keeping tabs on his family members’ movements while Alicia Kearns, a fellow critic of the regime, said she would not rule this out as China would “want us to feel watched”.
The senior Tory MP also said she knew of one colleague whose child’s study plans had been thrown into disarray because their parent was a politician who had been sanctioned by the Chinese state.
She said the prospective student’s university bid was threatened when the institution in question was warned all Chinese funds would be withdrawn if they accepted the application.
It has also been claimed that one politician’s child ran into trouble after being assigned a flight with a Chinese airline when their original journey was cancelled.
They were allegedly barred from getting on the plane for the replacement trip because of their surname.
The claims have emerged as The Telegraph spoke to five prominent China critics in Westminster – four Tory MPs and one crossbench peer – about the pressures they believe they are under to keep quiet.

Some MPs want a tougher line taken against President Xi Jinping CREDIT: Noel Celis/AFP via Getty Images
The parliamentarians, most of whom are sanctioned by the regime, reported a cocktail of online abuse peppered with threats and sexually aggressive language, targeted cyber attacks and organised provocations.
One China critic said he was told his safety could not be guaranteed on a trip to the Middle East over fears he could be extradited to Beijing, while one was said to have been advised against going on holiday to a European country because they had been sanctioned.
It comes amid increased debate among Conservatives about how firmly Rishi Sunak’s Government should stand up to President Xi Jinping’s regime.
The Prime Minister has taken a softer line on China than that expected from Liz Truss, his predecessor, dialling down his own language by opting to brand the state an “epoch-defining challenge” rather than a blanket “threat” to Britain.
Politicians of all persuasions see the rise of China as one of the biggest geopolitical challenges of the 21st century, and there has been a marked hardening of rhetoric in recent years.
Some of those who spoke to The Telegraph were keen to stress that any inconvenience they had suffered would be dwarfed by the struggles faced by the likes of Chinese dissidents. A sweeping security crackdown over the past decade has snuffed out nearly all avenues for civil discourse.

Strong-arm critics into silence​

But their personal accounts nevertheless reveal the potential extent of a suspected attempt to strong-arm Beijing critics into silence.
Ms Kearns, who is not sanctioned but believes she is on a “hit list” because of her record speaking out on China, was among many to report incidents of cyber intimidation, recounting a barrage of online abuse, including messages warning her that her “time is coming” and that she is “going to learn a lesson”.
The head of both the China Research Group and foreign affairs committee said she had been sent edited photos of herself paired with sexually explicit comments by someone she believed to be a Chinese hacker.
She said she suspected there were individuals linked to the Chinese state spending “enormous” amounts of time and effort impersonating MPs and their acquaintances for months on end with a view to souring their relationships.
Sir Iain suggested he had personally been the target of a similar campaign, whereby someone he claimed to have traced back to “the outskirts of Hong Kong” created a fake email purporting to be him.
This individual – who Sir Iain dubbed a “wolf warrior” – allegedly sought to convince politicians around the world that the ex-minister, a vocal critic of Beijing, had “recanted” his views and now considered the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to be a “beacon of goodness and decency”.
Sanctioned peer Lord David Alton said some of his own emails had been “mysteriously” wiped from his phone, while he suspected someone had spent “an awful lot of time” mounting “irritating” attacks on his website.
Bob Seely, the Tory MP for the Isle of Wight, also said he had managed to side-step one “unpleasant” attempt at an “organised provocation”. He said he had been tipped off a couple of times about “corporate spies crawling around the woodwork of my life” although he did not specify any link to China.
Mr Seely is not sanctioned by the regime but he is a member of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC), founded by Sir Iain, which aims to pressure governments across the world to adopt a tougher stance towards Beijing.
Elsewhere, critics have been forced to think twice before they travel. Beijing’s sanctions mean targeted MPs and peers, as well as their families, are prohibited from entering China and Hong Kong.

Bob Seely: 'I take sensible precautions but I refuse to overreact’ CREDIT: Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament
But further caution is apparently encouraged where officials fear those unpopular with the Chinese regime face a potential extradition risk.
Lord Alton recalled one occasion when he was warned the Foreign Office could not guarantee his safety if he went to see British troops in the Middle East with a parliamentary committee.
“It was necessary for three of us, members of the committee, to visit our military bases in the Gulf, and we went to Bahrain and Qatar,” he said.
“But I was given warning by the Foreign Office in advance that they couldn’t guarantee my safety.
“The anxiety would be that [China] might have an extradition agreement with a country you’re visiting, and it might just suit that country to ingratiate themselves with the People’s Republic of China because of, perhaps, indebtedness over Belt and Road.”
Ms Kearns also said people have markers on where they can and cannot travel, and she personally never flies across Chinese territory.
Tim Loughton, the Tory MP for East Worthing and Shoreham, said he had received letters in the past from the Chinese embassy advising him against going to conferences on Tibet, which contained “slightly veiled threats”.
All of the incidents cited by the five politicians are alleged – and it is hard to prove whether they are linked either directly or indirectly to the Chinese state.

Monitored by the growing power​

But they shine a light on the extent to which British parliamentarians fear their lives and those of their loved ones are being monitored by the growing global power.
Despite the critics’ wide-ranging reports of hostile behaviour none seemed deterred by their experiences, with Sir Iain insisting “we will carry on for the sake of those being persecuted”.
Mr Seely also said politicians in free societies who “think they are being brave” by speaking out against threats overseas “need a reality check”.
“I take sensible precautions but I refuse to overreact,” he said.
“We should, on principle, be speaking our version of truth, and if that offends some, so be it.”
A spokesman for the Chinese embassy dismissed the accusations as “baseless” and “pure rumours”, and warned against “stoking rivalry and confrontation”.
“A sound China-UK relationship serves the fundamental interest of the two peoples and is conducive to world peace, stability and development,” they said.

Iain Duncan Smith: You have to assume someone is listening in​

It is clear that if China wants to get to you, they’ll get to you. I’ve personally been targeted by “wolf warriors” – guys we suspect are set up by the Chinese government to track “annoying” or “bad” people, or those they consider a nuisance.
On this occasion someone created a fake email persona purporting to be me. We think we were able to track the culprit to somewhere on the outskirts of Hong Kong.
He’d been writing all over the world to various senators and MPs, people in Australia and America, telling them that I’d recanted my views and that I no longer believed that the Chinese Communist Party was bad. In fact, quite the contrary, apparently I now believed that they were a beacon of goodness and decency.
I started getting emails from people from around the world who knew of me saying they were sorry to hear it, or asking me why I was doing this. I had to explain to them that it was not me at all but an impostor.
That was at the low level. And it continues – every now and then it erupts, depending on how annoyed the Chinese government is.
The key is to be extra careful with how you handle information.
You have to assume automatically, all the time, that your telephone is a two-way listening device. It’s good to recognise that while these gadgets are clearly useful to us, they may also be useful to others.
We have certain things that we do and certain things that we don’t do. If you’re having serious conversations, put your telephone in a box somewhere and put it away. Don’t leave your phone on your desk.

Bots and denial of service​

IPAC, which I founded, also suffered an almost immediate denial of service attack when we set up our first website. We have to be slightly careful about what we’re saying.
There are also people – bots – dumping on you on Twitter. In terms of threats, I’ve been personally identified by the Chinese embassy in the UK and accused of being a liar and a person that tells untruths about Beijing. They post that on their website.
It affects our families too. That’s the bit that never gets reported. Our families are all sanctioned as well, at the same time.
If they’re grown-ups, that means their lives also have to be readjusted, which is annoying. That is exactly what has had to happen, even though they themselves were not involved in this process.
And I am aware that the Chinese state notes who and where my family are.
We are sanctioned because we have all been active in calling out the many abuses of President Xi’s CCP, from genocide of the Uyghur people to slave labour, persecution of peaceful Hong Kong democracy campaigners and organ harvesting, not to mention their threats to invade Taiwan.
But we will carry on for the sake of those being persecuted, regardless of any threat.
 
Tell us you think they have proof he knew and you told him, without telling us you think they have proof that he knew and you told him…



thats a bingo!! a yes in governese.........
 
Meanwhile in NYC:

Department of Justice arrests 2 men accused of setting up Chinese police outpost

Two men have been arrested on charges that they helped establish a secret police outpost in New York City on behalf of the Chinese government, U.S. Justice Department officials said Monday.

"New York City is home to New York's finest: the NYPD," U.S. Attorney Breon Peace, the top federal prosecutor in Brooklyn, said at a news conference announcing the arrests.

"We don't need or want a secret police station in our great city."




Officials separately announced charges against more than three dozen members of China's national police, accusing them of creating and using fake social media accounts to locate and harass dissidents in the United States.

The cases are part of a series of Justice Department prosecutions aimed at disrupting Chinese government efforts to target Chinese dissidents, including those promoting pro-democracy views, and stifle their speech.

China has also faced accusations of operating secret police stations in Canada, which Beijing has dismissed as an attempt by Ottawa to smear its reputation

There are at least three Chinese police outposts in and around Toronto in predominantly Chinese neighbourhoods, according to a report by human rights group Safeguard Defenders who say they’re being used to pressure some nationals to return to China. Now, the RCMP says it’s investigating whether any criminal activity is taking place.
 
And, as usual, it's probably far worse than we know - publicly at any rate ...

Chinese political interference has Western spooks worried​

With money and support, China hopes to bend foreign politicians to its will​


Christine lee once mingled easily with members of Britain’s elite. The Hong Kong-born British solicitor frequently visited Parliament, where legislators supported her work helping ethnic Chinese get more involved in politics. She even received an award for her efforts from Theresa May, who was then prime minister. The two were photographed together at Downing Street in 2019.

In January that award was rescinded—because, according to mi5, a British spy agency, Ms Lee has been covertly working for China. In a security notice issued to parliamentarians that month, the agency warned them about her “political interference activities”. It was the first of its kind naming China, though not a complete surprise. “You might think in terms of the Russian intelligence services providing bursts of bad weather,” said Ken McCallum in 2020, shortly after becoming mi5’s chief. “China is changing the climate.”

Britain is not the only Western country sensing a change in atmosphere. American officials also warn of covert attempts by China to bend local politicians to its will. The alarms grew louder during the presidency of Donald Trump. “China is expanding its influence efforts to shape the policy environment in the United States, pressure political figures it views as opposed to China’s interests, and counter criticism of China,” noted William Evanina, then the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Centre, in 2020.

In a report last year the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (csis) said it had observed “persistent and sophisticated state-sponsored threat activity targeting elections for many years now” with “a rise in its frequency and sophistication”. It did not name the countries involved, but earlier in the year David Vigneault, the chief of csis, said his agency was most concerned about actions by “countries like Russia and China”. In January the Globe and Mail, a newspaper, said Canada’s spies had been briefing selected parliamentarians about influence operations by China, as well as other countries.

“Espionage and foreign interference has supplanted terrorism as our principal security concern,” said Mike Burgess, the head of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (asio), in February. He says his agency recently thwarted an attempt by a person nicknamed “the puppeteer”, working on behalf of a foreign government, to interfere in an Australian election. Using an offshore account, the puppeteer planned to support candidates who either backed the interests of the foreign government or who were deemed vulnerable to inducements and cultivation. “It was like a foreign-interference startup,” said Mr Burgess.

The spy chief did not identify the government or the puppeteer. An Australian senator (who died last month of a suspected heart attack) said she had been “reliably informed” who the person was: she named a prominent ethnic-Chinese Australian businessman. asio has not confirmed this, and the person has denied the allegations. But the country referred to by Mr Burgess was undoubtedly China.

It is believed that a common factor in these allegations of political interference is a branch of the Chinese Communist Party called the United Front Work Department (ufwd). mi5’s notice about Ms Lee says the organisation “identifies and cultivates individuals” with the goal of promoting the party’s agenda and “challenging those that do not subscribe to its policies”.

Ms Lee’s connections with the ufwd are hardly a secret. She has acknowledged her work as a “legal adviser” to the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office, a division of the ufwd. She has served as a director of the China Overseas Friendship Association, a body under the ufwd’s control. Her website in China, now closed, described a meeting in Beijing of the association’s directors in 2019. “I should do a good job as a communicator of China’s voice,” she told the gathering. “I should also keep firmly in mind General Secretary Xi Jinping’s instructions,” she said, referring to China’s leader. “I should turn them into guidance for my own actions and firmly implement them.” State television showed a grinning Ms Lee shaking Mr Xi’s hand at the gathering (the ufwd’s chief was also there).

It had also long been known that Ms Lee had been providing money for staff in the office of a prominent opposition politician in Britain, Barry Gardiner of the Labour Party: a total of more than £500,000 ($650,000) over several years. Mr Gardiner says that this funding ended in 2020, that Ms Lee had no role in the appointment or management of his team members, that he did not profit personally and that Ms Lee’s son, who was working as his diary manager, resigned after mi5 issued its warning.

From China with love​

mi5, it appears, is now more certain that Ms Lee obtained funds from China to hand out to a wide range of recipients, from political parties and legislators to aspiring politicians. Mr Gardiner says security officials told him they had no evidence that the money his office received came from China, and no evidence of any complicity in Ms Lee’s alleged activities by her son.

Little has come to light publicly that shows China has gained much from its overseas influence operations. Only one case has been reported so far of a senior Western politician receiving money from a source linked to the Chinese campaign and then siding with China in a way clearly at odds with mainstream opinion. It involved Sam Dastyari, an opposition legislator in Australia who, in 2017, urged his government to “respect” China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea. Amid a furore over this, he resigned from parliament.

What worries the spooks, however, is something subtler than securing support for China’s building of bases on contested reefs. The ufwd, they believe, often wants politicians to help China just by keeping silent: avoiding criticism of Chinese policy and refraining from supporting action, such as sanctions, that might cause difficulties for China’s government. The ufwd is not a spy service, but its targets are sometimes of interest to China’s espionage outfits, too. It facilitates their work.

Much of the ufwd’s effort is directed at people inside China: influential citizens such as businessmen, academics, religious leaders, ethnic minorities and people from Hong Kong and Taiwan. Abroad, it mainly focuses on winning over ethnic Chinese, and through them, creating bonds between the party and Western elites, including politicians. Like his predecessors, Mr Xi calls political-influence efforts one of the party’s fabao (talismans). In 2015 he set up a “leading small group” to supervise them, bringing such operations closer to the heart of the party’s decision-making.

China’s official media have highlighted Ms Lee’s work as leader of the British Chinese Project (in February she applied for its dissolution). The aim of this organisation was to encourage ethnic Chinese to play a bigger role in British politics. On the face of it, this was a noble cause. Historically, voter-turnout rates have been low within this community; it was not until 2015 that Britain elected its first ethnic-Chinese mp. But the promotion of huaren canzheng (ethnic-Chinese participation in politics) is also one of the stated missions of the ufwd in the West. Ms Lee took ethnic-Chinese candidates on trips to China, where ufwd officials preached to them about the virtues of China’s political system.

Again, there is no evidence that such tactics work. China’s prestige in the West has taken a battering from the horrors Mr Xi has unleashed in Xinjiang, his gutting of freedoms in Hong Kong and, most recently, from his tacit backing of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It would take a brave politician to stand up in any Western legislature and defend such a record. Support for Chinese investment in the West’s critical infrastructure has all but evaporated in recent years because of security concerns. Western spies warn of the danger of overreaction. asio’s Mr Burgess said it was critical not to let fear of foreign interference “stoke community division”. In February America’s Department of Justice ended a Trump-era campaign against Chinese theft of intellectual property amid claims that the effort, called the “China Initiative”, was encouraging ethnic profiling.

There is a clear danger, however, when China’s real spooks get involved. Their work abroad—apart from gathering secrets—includes intimidating political enemies such as exiles from Xinjiang and other dissidents. A recent case involves Yan Xiong, a student leader during the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 who became an American citizen and served as a chaplain in the us Army. Mr Xiong is now making a bid for Congress as a Democratic candidate in New York. A primary election is due to be held in June. His Tiananmen background makes him the kind of ethnic Chinese whom the party definitely does not want elected.

In March the fbi alleged that an operative of China’s spy service, the Ministry of State Security, had asked a private investigator in America to try to thwart Mr Xiong’s campaign by finding something that might discredit him, such as a tax violation or contact with a prostitute. Failing that, the fbi quoted the spy as saying in a voice message, “violence would be fine, too”, including a “car accident”.

Although the fbi did not name Mr Xiong, the candidate confirmed that he was the target. “I was a soldier, I have the Lord in my heart,” he insists. “I have no fear.” But Mr Xiong says that now he drives even more cautiously and is on guard when he is out at night.

 
A problem with anonymous sources is that the reader has no way of judging the credibility of the source. Are the reported claims useful facts, or someone's talking points being funneled through a useful idiot posing as a journalist? At that point, the only way to judge credibility hinges on the journalist's credibility.
 
A problem with anonymous sources is that the reader has no way of judging the credibility of the source. Are the reported claims useful facts, or someone's talking points being funneled through a useful idiot posing as a journalist? At that point, the only way to judge credibility hinges on the journalist's credibility.
nothing wrong with that provided said journalist has established his integrity over a prolonged period of time. Taking something someone said over a "news" blog as being gospel simply because it is on the internet so it must be true though is more often the way that truth is ascertained and credentials certified. I would accept something printed by Salim Mansur any day for example but I question most of what is written or published on the CBC.
 
Canada should have arrested the foreign operatives here a long time ago. But I guess that’s not the Canadian way. Perhaps JT feels a stern dressing down is sufficient to shame the bad guys into seeing the light, feeling remorse and embracing the democratic way of life.

Gotta find an actual criminal offense that fits the facts, and then you have to be able to prove it in court. Not easy, especially if knowledge of the act comes from national security intelligence that can’t be disclosed.

There may be gaps in our laws that need to be closed if we want authorities to have more power to act on this, and to be able to do so with less perfect circumstances and evidence.
 
Gotta find an actual criminal offense that fits the facts, and then you have to be able to prove it in court. Not easy, especially if knowledge of the act comes from national security intelligence that can’t be disclosed.

There may be gaps in our laws that need to be closed if we want authorities to have more power to act on this, and to be able to do so with less perfect circumstances and evidence.
Just wondering…would there not be, say, any kind of national security law that covers anyone acting as agents of a foreign government and whose acts benefit that country and are detrimental to Canada? I realize that may be pretty broad and hard to get any conviction though. But if there are no suitable laws or legal means available currently then that definitely needs to be addressed. I would at least hope that some Chinese consular officials could be sent packing as a result even if Beijing responds with a tit-for-tat expulsion of Canadian diplomats.
 
Just wondering…would there not be, say, any kind of national security law that covers anyone acting as agents of a foreign government and whose acts benefit that country and are detrimental to Canada? I realize that may be pretty broad and hard to get any conviction though. But if there are no suitable laws or legal means available currently then that definitely needs to be addressed. I would at least hope that some Chinese consular officials could be sent packing as a result even if Beijing responds with a tit-for-tat expulsion of Canadian diplomats.

There are various provisions within the Security of Information Act that cover conventional espionage, and one that covers foreign interference via threats, but I don’t think that’s a tested section.

The problem will always be proving it in court. Will witnesses/victims testify? Is the evidence gleaned by law enforcement and admissible in court? ‘Cause if the info comes from CSIS or CSE, forget it.

Canada struggles with the ‘intelligence to evidence’ dilemma. Other countries have courts that are better set up to involve security intelligence in criminal proceedings. I’m not expert on it though, and cannot say what the fix is. Some very knowledgeable academics are working in that field, but Canada will probably need to be bitten in the ass for legislators to turn their minds to addressing it.
 
A bit of "remember when?" from a right-ish U.S. think tank report on the Chinese overseas cop shops - highlights mine:
... CCP influence in Canada is not new. In 1997, the CSIS and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) concluded in Project Sidewinder: Chinese Intelligence Services and Triads Financial Links in Canada that the PRC was deliberately trying to influence Canada. The Project Sidewinder draft report—a copy of which was leaked—stated that:

Because of its strategic alliance with some important and influential Hong Kong business people, and with organized crime syndicates, the Chinese leadership appears to be today in a position to developing [sic] a potential of influence over the international market and particularly on the Canadian economy and political life of the country… China remains one of the greatest ongoing threats to Canada’s national security and Canadian industry. There is no longer any doubt that the ChIS have been able to gain influence on important sectors of the Canadian economy, including education, real estate, high technology, security and many others. [46]

To reiterate, the assessment that “China remains one of the greatest ongoing threats to Canada’s national security” was written in 1997. Over 25 years later, the current government in Canada has initiated an independent investigation into possible CCP meddling in their elections. The report was suppressed as the CSIS disagreed with the findings, whilst the RCMP believed that the threat assessment of the PRC intelligence was credible. [47] ...
More on OP Sidewinder here & attached (SIRC review public document)
 

Attachments

. Some very knowledgeable academics are working in that field, but Canada will probably need to be bitten in the ass for legislators to turn their minds to addressing it.
Like always - typically Canadian solution is kick the can down the road and let some other sap handle it.
 
And, as usual, it's probably far worse than we know - publicly at any rate ...

Chinese political interference has Western spooks worried​

With money and support, China hopes to bend foreign politicians to its will​


Christine lee once mingled easily with members of Britain’s elite. The Hong Kong-born British solicitor frequently visited Parliament, where legislators supported her work helping ethnic Chinese get more involved in politics. She even received an award for her efforts from Theresa May, who was then prime minister. The two were photographed together at Downing Street in 2019.

In January that award was rescinded—because, according to mi5, a British spy agency, Ms Lee has been covertly working for China. In a security notice issued to parliamentarians that month, the agency warned them about her “political interference activities”. It was the first of its kind naming China, though not a complete surprise. “You might think in terms of the Russian intelligence services providing bursts of bad weather,” said Ken McCallum in 2020, shortly after becoming mi5’s chief. “China is changing the climate.”

Britain is not the only Western country sensing a change in atmosphere. American officials also warn of covert attempts by China to bend local politicians to its will. The alarms grew louder during the presidency of Donald Trump. “China is expanding its influence efforts to shape the policy environment in the United States, pressure political figures it views as opposed to China’s interests, and counter criticism of China,” noted William Evanina, then the director of the National Counterintelligence and Security Centre, in 2020.

In a report last year the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (csis) said it had observed “persistent and sophisticated state-sponsored threat activity targeting elections for many years now” with “a rise in its frequency and sophistication”. It did not name the countries involved, but earlier in the year David Vigneault, the chief of csis, said his agency was most concerned about actions by “countries like Russia and China”. In January the Globe and Mail, a newspaper, said Canada’s spies had been briefing selected parliamentarians about influence operations by China, as well as other countries.

“Espionage and foreign interference has supplanted terrorism as our principal security concern,” said Mike Burgess, the head of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (asio), in February. He says his agency recently thwarted an attempt by a person nicknamed “the puppeteer”, working on behalf of a foreign government, to interfere in an Australian election. Using an offshore account, the puppeteer planned to support candidates who either backed the interests of the foreign government or who were deemed vulnerable to inducements and cultivation. “It was like a foreign-interference startup,” said Mr Burgess.

The spy chief did not identify the government or the puppeteer. An Australian senator (who died last month of a suspected heart attack) said she had been “reliably informed” who the person was: she named a prominent ethnic-Chinese Australian businessman. asio has not confirmed this, and the person has denied the allegations. But the country referred to by Mr Burgess was undoubtedly China.

It is believed that a common factor in these allegations of political interference is a branch of the Chinese Communist Party called the United Front Work Department (ufwd). mi5’s notice about Ms Lee says the organisation “identifies and cultivates individuals” with the goal of promoting the party’s agenda and “challenging those that do not subscribe to its policies”.

Ms Lee’s connections with the ufwd are hardly a secret. She has acknowledged her work as a “legal adviser” to the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office, a division of the ufwd. She has served as a director of the China Overseas Friendship Association, a body under the ufwd’s control. Her website in China, now closed, described a meeting in Beijing of the association’s directors in 2019. “I should do a good job as a communicator of China’s voice,” she told the gathering. “I should also keep firmly in mind General Secretary Xi Jinping’s instructions,” she said, referring to China’s leader. “I should turn them into guidance for my own actions and firmly implement them.” State television showed a grinning Ms Lee shaking Mr Xi’s hand at the gathering (the ufwd’s chief was also there).

It had also long been known that Ms Lee had been providing money for staff in the office of a prominent opposition politician in Britain, Barry Gardiner of the Labour Party: a total of more than £500,000 ($650,000) over several years. Mr Gardiner says that this funding ended in 2020, that Ms Lee had no role in the appointment or management of his team members, that he did not profit personally and that Ms Lee’s son, who was working as his diary manager, resigned after mi5 issued its warning.

From China with love​

mi5, it appears, is now more certain that Ms Lee obtained funds from China to hand out to a wide range of recipients, from political parties and legislators to aspiring politicians. Mr Gardiner says security officials told him they had no evidence that the money his office received came from China, and no evidence of any complicity in Ms Lee’s alleged activities by her son.

Little has come to light publicly that shows China has gained much from its overseas influence operations. Only one case has been reported so far of a senior Western politician receiving money from a source linked to the Chinese campaign and then siding with China in a way clearly at odds with mainstream opinion. It involved Sam Dastyari, an opposition legislator in Australia who, in 2017, urged his government to “respect” China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea. Amid a furore over this, he resigned from parliament.

What worries the spooks, however, is something subtler than securing support for China’s building of bases on contested reefs. The ufwd, they believe, often wants politicians to help China just by keeping silent: avoiding criticism of Chinese policy and refraining from supporting action, such as sanctions, that might cause difficulties for China’s government. The ufwd is not a spy service, but its targets are sometimes of interest to China’s espionage outfits, too. It facilitates their work.

Much of the ufwd’s effort is directed at people inside China: influential citizens such as businessmen, academics, religious leaders, ethnic minorities and people from Hong Kong and Taiwan. Abroad, it mainly focuses on winning over ethnic Chinese, and through them, creating bonds between the party and Western elites, including politicians. Like his predecessors, Mr Xi calls political-influence efforts one of the party’s fabao (talismans). In 2015 he set up a “leading small group” to supervise them, bringing such operations closer to the heart of the party’s decision-making.

China’s official media have highlighted Ms Lee’s work as leader of the British Chinese Project (in February she applied for its dissolution). The aim of this organisation was to encourage ethnic Chinese to play a bigger role in British politics. On the face of it, this was a noble cause. Historically, voter-turnout rates have been low within this community; it was not until 2015 that Britain elected its first ethnic-Chinese mp. But the promotion of huaren canzheng (ethnic-Chinese participation in politics) is also one of the stated missions of the ufwd in the West. Ms Lee took ethnic-Chinese candidates on trips to China, where ufwd officials preached to them about the virtues of China’s political system.

Again, there is no evidence that such tactics work. China’s prestige in the West has taken a battering from the horrors Mr Xi has unleashed in Xinjiang, his gutting of freedoms in Hong Kong and, most recently, from his tacit backing of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. It would take a brave politician to stand up in any Western legislature and defend such a record. Support for Chinese investment in the West’s critical infrastructure has all but evaporated in recent years because of security concerns. Western spies warn of the danger of overreaction. asio’s Mr Burgess said it was critical not to let fear of foreign interference “stoke community division”. In February America’s Department of Justice ended a Trump-era campaign against Chinese theft of intellectual property amid claims that the effort, called the “China Initiative”, was encouraging ethnic profiling.

There is a clear danger, however, when China’s real spooks get involved. Their work abroad—apart from gathering secrets—includes intimidating political enemies such as exiles from Xinjiang and other dissidents. A recent case involves Yan Xiong, a student leader during the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 who became an American citizen and served as a chaplain in the us Army. Mr Xiong is now making a bid for Congress as a Democratic candidate in New York. A primary election is due to be held in June. His Tiananmen background makes him the kind of ethnic Chinese whom the party definitely does not want elected.

In March the fbi alleged that an operative of China’s spy service, the Ministry of State Security, had asked a private investigator in America to try to thwart Mr Xiong’s campaign by finding something that might discredit him, such as a tax violation or contact with a prostitute. Failing that, the fbi quoted the spy as saying in a voice message, “violence would be fine, too”, including a “car accident”.

Although the fbi did not name Mr Xiong, the candidate confirmed that he was the target. “I was a soldier, I have the Lord in my heart,” he insists. “I have no fear.” But Mr Xiong says that now he drives even more cautiously and is on guard when he is out at night.

Its a bit of a 180 on the past. In the 1950-1989 era, direct immigration from the SU was close to nil. The Soviets didn't really allow anyone to emigrate, especially if the person had any skill set that was in demand by the state. When individuals did make it to the West, most were with open arms, only a very small number were met with doubt/suspicion. Virtually all of them quickly 'assimilated' (bad word in today's world), embraced the Western way of life and a large number were really anti-communists and supported the West steadfastly.

Today, Communist China actively, willingly allows its citizens, even those with key skill sets, to leave the country and move to the West. We, in turn, actively solicit those people and do very little in vetting them in terms of their political beliefs. We, in many ways, are the architects of our own demise.

In no way am I against immigration to Canada, but when you look at say, the top 5 countries that people come from to Canada you have - India, China, Afghanistan, Nigeria and Philippines.

India has had a life-long stance of being the unofficial leader of the 'non-aligned' world and has been a long-life top buyer of Soviet/Russian arms. There isn't alot of 'love' of the US or the UK, our 2 traditional long-term allies.

China, well, there's been enough said about this already.

Afghanistan is a 'blip' as its not been traditional in the top 5 or top 10. Its extremely conservative religiously, has been labelled as a 'failed state' for a few decades now, has 0 tradition as a democracy, no love for the US or Uk or anything related to NATO.

Nigeria is quickly becoming the most populous country in Africa, a fragmented country between North/South, Christian/Muslim/Animist, rural urban. Mostly aligned to the non-aligned movement, most ignored by the West for decades, courted had by China today and recently. No ties to NATO, little love for US/UK policies.

The Philippines, aligned more towards the US, has waxed/waned over the years about this, realising now China is looking to implement Japan's old 'Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere' with the Philippines again being a very junior partner if it succeeds. English speaking, mostly Christian, embraces the Western life once here.

Overall results - in my humble opinion. A 'win' with the Philippines, a 'push' with Nigeria, an 'unknown at this point' with India/Afghanistan and well, with the CCP citizens, I think its a case of 'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly', a nod to Clint Eastwood here.
 
I wonder if any one in power actually listens to or reads intelligence briefs - either OS or classified.

You have to know that any nation that willingly kills a good number of its citizens or imprisons them for political reasons has to be a nation you want to keep a close eye on. Facepalm.
 
Great news for Canadian coal! ;)

China approves coal surge despite emissions pledge: Greenpeace​

Approvals of coal-fired power plants fuel concerns that China will backtrack on goal to become carbon neutral by 2060.

China has approved a surge in coal power this year, prioritising energy supplies over its pledge to reduce emissions from fossil fuels, according to a report by Greenpeace.

The world’s second-largest economy is also its biggest emitter of the greenhouse gases driving climate change. China’s emissions pledges are seen as essential to keeping global temperature rises well below 2 degrees Celsius.

The jump in approvals for coal-fired power plants, however, has fuelled concerns that China will backtrack on its goals for its emissions to peak between 2026 and 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2060.

Local governments in energy-hungry Chinese provinces approved at least 20.45 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired power in the first three months of 2023, Greenpeace said on Monday.

That is more than double the 8.63GW Greenpeace reported for the same period last year and greater than the 18.55GW that got the green light for the whole of 2021.

China relied on coal for nearly 60 percent of its electricity last year.

The push for more coal plants is risking “climate disasters … and locking us into a high-carbon pathway”, Greenpeace campaigner Xie Wenwen said.

“The 2022 coal boom has clearly continued into this year,” Xie said.

A study released in February by the Global Energy Monitor said China last year approved the largest expansion of coal-fired power plants since 2015.

Most of the new coal projects approved in the January-March period this year were in provinces that have suffered punishing power shortages due to record heatwaves in the past two years, Greenpeace said.

China approves coal surge despite emissions pledge: Greenpeace
 
Great news for Canadian coal! ;)

China approves coal surge despite emissions pledge: Greenpeace​

Approvals of coal-fired power plants fuel concerns that China will backtrack on goal to become carbon neutral by 2060.

China has approved a surge in coal power this year, prioritising energy supplies over its pledge to reduce emissions from fossil fuels, according to a report by Greenpeace.

The world’s second-largest economy is also its biggest emitter of the greenhouse gases driving climate change. China’s emissions pledges are seen as essential to keeping global temperature rises well below 2 degrees Celsius.

The jump in approvals for coal-fired power plants, however, has fuelled concerns that China will backtrack on its goals for its emissions to peak between 2026 and 2030 and to become carbon neutral by 2060.

Local governments in energy-hungry Chinese provinces approved at least 20.45 gigawatts (GW) of coal-fired power in the first three months of 2023, Greenpeace said on Monday.



China approves coal surge despite emissions pledge: Greenpeace
Except we don't have the infrastructure in place to deliver it and environmental concerns will ensure that we never do. Isn't it ironic that we can't export our oil which is far less polluting than coal.
 
Except we don't have the infrastructure in place to deliver it and environmental concerns will ensure that we never do. Isn't it ironic that we can't export our oil which is far less polluting than coal.
If China wants the coal, the governments in this country will make sure it gets it.
 
If China wants the coal, the governments in this country will make sure it gets it.

We've already been giving them alot of coal, and alot of other stuff, for decades:


As for exports, China is second only to the U.S. in terms of its importance as a buyer of B.C. commodities. China accounted for $8.5 billion worth of B.C. exports in 2022, and just three commodities accounted for 75 per cent of the value, according to BC Stats.

Of the $11.8 billion in metallurgical coal exports from B.C. in 2022, China claimed $3.1 billion (36 per cent). It also accounted for 24 per cent ($2 billion) of B.C.’s pulp exports and 15 per cent ($1.3 billion) of B.C.’s copper ore and concentrate exports.

While copper is one of the 31 minerals on Canada’s critical minerals list, it’s unlikely B.C. miners are about to lose China as a key copper buyer. It might be different if B.C. had any copper refining capacity of its own, but it doesn’t.

 
Back
Top