• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canadian Surface Combatant RFQ




I obviously confused the Taiwan light frigate program with the Korean light frigate program. To many programs for corvettes and light frigates in the Asia pacific to keep straight.
 
I obviously confused the Taiwan light frigate program with the Korean light frigate program. To many programs for corvettes and light frigates in the Asia pacific to keep straight.
Ugh I would not want to be on a Taiwanese Frigate when things heat up. The odds of long term survival in that contested waters would not be good.
 
I obviously confused the Taiwan light frigate program with the Korean light frigate program. To many programs for corvettes and light frigates in the Asia pacific to keep straight.
It'd be nice if they gave it a more memorable name than just "Light Frigate" prgoram.
 
Canada Looks to US Navy for Non-Developmental EW for CSC

Article on EW for the CSC.

-Electronic Attack is provided by NULKA -The Nulka active missile decoy is the most sophisticated soft-kill defence system against anti-ship missiles available for the protection of surface warships (stuff in bold is from the Nulka website... take it with salt though the system is quite good, if it was that good though the USN wouldn't need SEWIP Block 3)
-Electronic Support provided by AN/SLQ-32(V)6 (SEWIP Block 2) - The SEWIP Block 2 system provides early detection, analysis, and threat warning from anti-ship missiles for surface ships.
-MDA is still doing the laser warning and countermeasure system
-SRD 506 is going to be installed as well - communications detection system, the family of which we use in the RCN
-the one thing they are missing is the SOPD which are big floaty decoys that look like 20 sided dice. Those are also EA systems

The reasons for changes from some previously listed equipment (RAVEN, Zeus, NGDS) is as follows:

Code for... most of this stuff is already integrated into AEGIS so lets not screw around paying for different equipment to be integrated (or more likely US will not allow any changes to AEGIS). It's also a shot against RAVEN which is still in development.

Overall good decision for the project to reduce integration risk, though I really liked the Safran NGDS trainable decoy launcher system quite a bit even over NULKA mainly because of its flexibility and coverage.
I wonder if RAVEN will be entirely discarded or if this is just a measure to finalize the design and expedite the construction timeline? RAVEN likely has some value as an export system due to being ITAR free alongside being the system the RCN ultimately wants due to it being built from the ground up for CSC as far as I know. RAVEN should have electronic attack capability (?) while SEWIP Block 2 lacks it, I am a bit hesitant to see if this is a good idea if we lose that capability and don't get it back on some ships given the threats we will be facing.

Will RAVEN or SEWIP Block 3 be fitted to future batches of CSC and potentially be retrofitted to the initial batch? Is there some other EA system to give capability to a SEWIP Block 2 equipped vessel?
 
I wonder if RAVEN will be entirely discarded or if this is just a measure to finalize the design and expedite the construction timeline? RAVEN likely has some value as an export system due to being ITAR free alongside being the system the RCN ultimately wants due to it being built from the ground up for CSC as far as I know. RAVEN should have electronic attack capability (?) while SEWIP Block 2 lacks it, I am a bit hesitant to see if this is a good idea if we lose that capability and don't get it back on some ships given the threats we will be facing.

Will RAVEN or SEWIP Block 3 be fitted to future batches of CSC and potentially be retrofitted to the initial batch? Is there some other EA system to give capability to a SEWIP Block 2 equipped vessel?
Until Block 3 Nulka was good enough.

I would not expect anything other than what the US uses or has already integrated to be installed on an Aegis ship. So look at historical stuff and other EA systems and take your pick. Since CMS looks to be relegated to Sonar equipment only it pretty much removes the entire point of having your own EW development if you can't integrate it.

Canada loses a ton of sovereign control over naval equipment with this setup. There is a reason the Italians, British and France keep their own CMS systems. So they can integrate their own equipment.
 
Back
Top