• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

British Military Current Events

RN submariner recruiting video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlFSxbOauqU&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR14piz_efKv9KsY9UKUXLxNAHInqFUipMbNeNAZJ8gHbvdwbKkH38NeqyQ
 
Army discusses the future with Industry

Today, over 320 members of the defence industry gathered virtually with the British Army at the Land Industrial Symposium to discuss mutual investment in the transformation of the Army and the future security and prosperity of the United Kingdom.

The event follows the launch of the government’s Defence and Security Industrial Strategy (DSIS) in March 2020 promoting the British defence industry, the second largest Defence exporter in the World, enhancing the relationship between the Services and industry, and ensuring that the benefits of the Army’s £19.5 billion investment in land equipment are felt as part of the levelling-up across the whole United Kingdom.
Speaking at the Symposium, the Deputy Chief of the General Staff, Lt Gen Christopher Tickell CBE said:

‘Welcome to the 2020 Land Industry Symposium, certainly the first online Symposium of its kind we have held. It’s a pleasure for me to be able to talk to so many of you – and for so many more to be able to join; this is just one example of the advantage of digital technology – of which more later!

This is an opportunity for some of those who are working hard on current and future delivery of equipment programmes to share our thoughts with the defence industry community. Although I can’t actually see you; be assured that making time to hold events such as this one is, in my view, time well spent. Without you, we cannot have the progress we need, at the rate of change the world demands, with the right R+D in place.

This symbiotic relationship must continue to deepen, in order that we should both succeed.

In these extraordinary times, it is perhaps more important than ever that we have such an opportunity to maintain a dialogue; none of us have had any experience in dealing with the strategic shock COVID has delivered, nor do we yet know the full implications – for the global economy, for the UK, or for the whole world. But we can continue to work together, to ensure we can return to some kind of new normal as fast as possible.

The Army’s training, competencies and standards were called upon in short order to meet some of the immediate and medium-term requirements COVID threw us.

And – to quote from a previous CGS, General Sir Peter Wall –

It is quite natural……that this large resource of well-trained commanders and staff officers can make a significant contribution in any national crisis that requires a well-planned response, thinking to the finish. A response that has to work, despite the friction and setbacks that will naturally occur. A response that deals with an unknowable, undefinable and unpredictable threat in the form of Covid 19 and which requires a fusion of talents drawn from all sectors of our society.

We have been demonstrated to be – and will continue to be – the nation’s guarantor for a wide range of contingencies. Providing specialist assistance and a sizeable, versatile backstop. But as a result of COVID, things are going to change: In terms of working practises, exemplified by events like this one; In financial terms; budgets are undoubtably going to be impacted; And in the way we all operate. How are we going to manage this collaboratively?

Against this backdrop then, it is worth considering some of the strategic issues that were already developing – if not accelerating – before COVID:

Firstly, we are in an age of exponential change – a global technological revolution occurring at a rate which it is ever-more challenging to keep pace with. One which is no longer driven by Governments’ R+D, but by commercial demands. We also see an era of constant competition - our adversaries are using asymmetric methods, have digital capability and reach, and are seemingly unbound by multilateralism or a rules-based order.

It’s extraordinarily difficult to meet that competition – to do so we must develop autonomous systems to reduce risk to force; train more specialists to compete in the cyber and electronic warfare space, and to use more unconventional warfare.

We must modernise capability – I think that’s universally acknowledged to be a truism – although we need to maintain a credible armoured fleet – like Challenger and Warrior - at the same time.

Secondly; the weakening of the global economy, coupled with a vacuum in terms of leadership, and a rise in nationalism across the world. Finally, the increasing assertiveness of Russia and China, and the implications for us, and for our relationships and alliances in the future.

These are challenges we are all facing. Our relationship with industry, then, is going to be one of the most important factors in how we address many of those strategic issues, allowing us to truly transform how we operate; being dynamic and innovative, and thinking long-term.

The Army Warfighting Experiment is perhaps the biggest, and most familiar, example of the success of our partnerships with industry. Many of you will have had the pleasure of Salisbury Plain in winter, when AWE took place in December 2018. We will be delivering AWE again, noting the results it has already delivered.

Such experimentation has delivered tech that is now being used by soldiers, like the Black Hornet three. The Black Hornet 3 is a micro-drone designed for short-range reconnaissance. The drone weighs just 30grams – barely a tenth of the weight of your average mobile phone. Soldiers from a 3 SCOTS used the IR sensor to find the enemy on a defensive position and then moved through the position in a matter of minutes. This was because troops were able to understand a huge level of detail, down to car registrations and door entry points.

It has a sortie time of about 25 min and a range of about 2km. It has both electro-optic and infrared cameras, allowing Sections to conduct route clearances with greater stand-off distance between sensor and soldier, keeping them outside the threat envelope for longer. The drone can replace more risky roaming patrols to keep soldiers safer and afford them some more rest time. It was procured in June 2018 and was in use four months later.

We also saw troops develop the use beyond that which was originally taught; the system was used to search vehicles struck by IEDs, reducing the threat. The thermal capacity was used to understand effectiveness of Blue Forces’ camouflage and concealment – even to observe and reduce their thermal signature, reducing the chance of being detected by the enemy. Such use can provide a feedback loop to you, the developers, to continuously improve the technology.

I can’t think of a better illustration of how equipment programmes, industry, and the soldiers on the ground are working together to make progress in our ambition to be a lighter, faster and more agile outfit.

We are absolutely going to double down on areas such as this, working with industry partners who can lean in to problems, use innovative solutions, and add value.

We are looking forward to progressing The Army BattleLab initiative; which is not just an example of our commitment to engage, but also an opportunity to extend the effort outside big set pieces like AWE. The chance to accelerate prototype warfare – testing and experimentation - and lead this area of Defence innovation, and to work with industry on a more regular footing.

Partnership is the future; the Army’s deepening relationship with industry is the way we can make progress to best effect.

We acknowledge that, given the timing of this symposium, we are somewhat limited in what we can expand upon regarding the Integrated Review, which we are expecting to be published in the autumn. Having said that, what I can tell you is that this will be a punchy proposition, which aims to answer all of the strategic and tactical considerations already mentioned.

My own comment on the Integrated Review would be to say that we are working hard to modernise and transform – Be under no illusion, this will be absolutely future-focused. We must sort out our big equipment programmes, but we are not just looking at savings, we are also looking at ways we can give ourselves the headroom to invest further in areas like cyber and EW.

National resilience is undoubtably higher up on the Government’s agenda. We are likely to see greater emphasis on UK supply chains and solving some of the vulnerabilities which have emerged as a result of the pandemic (some of which the Army was able to help solve in the short term). Trends indicate the Nation will face increasing environmental, economic and social challenges in the coming decade, as well as the continued threat of terrorism and pandemics.

In answer to these trends, the Army’s national and regional footprint - just as General Sir Peter Wall described in our response to COVID – allows an effective command network, with specialist capabilities and ‘disciplined, versatile mass.’

Global Britain. British interests abroad. Exports. Expect to see these considerations being given more weight in our higher-level strategic thinking. You will have seen that, with the merger of DFiD and FCO, the Government is fully focused on Global Britain as a strategic concept; and the Army – with its international footprint and bases in places such as Brunei, Germany, Kenya and Oman – will be at the heart of meeting this aim.

Prosperity will be ever-more important – what are we doing as the Army, and what are we doing collectively, with industry, to enhance prosperity from as many perspectives as possible? Are we investing in the right capabilities, The right skills And the right infrastructure long term? Are we doing our bit in the Army to train our people in a way that invests in them, and in our future capability? What can we do with you to ensure we are thinking about our export potential as we develop platforms?

The key to progress here is mutual understanding:

So, to the remainder of the session: You will hear more detail on the British Army Land Operating Concept; how we are going to fight and train in the digital era; and how we are going to meet the challenges I have set out already.

The Defence Security Industrial Strategy review into the UK’s defence and security industrial strategy will identify how the government can take a more strategic approach to ensure that we have competitive, innovative and world-class defence and security industry sectors.

You will hear more on what the DSIS means for us; for Army and industry together – key themes are likely to be; how open architecture and modular systems can help smooth the procurement cycle, how exports can be given greater consideration, and how we can support employment and economic growth.

And you will hear that we are committed to working in ever-closer partnership on Defence Digital, and ongoing equipment programmes.

More importantly though, this should be a conversation; we also need to listen to you, to understand and to be open to innovation, to dialogue and to new perspectives.

So before I hand over, I’d like to leave you with a final thought; adaptability, and seizing opportunity, coupled with a willingness to learn, will be how we make the most of these unusual times. I very much hope to see many of you in person soon.

https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2020/07/army-industrial-symposium/
 
MarkOttawa said:
Excerpts from a post at Thin Pinstriped Line that are very relevant, to my mind, to Canada:

Mark
Ottawa

Now the start and finish of a post by Julian French-Lindley that raises questions very relevant to Canada also:

Little Britain 2? A Hard Rain is Cummings

“A hard rain is coming”

Dominic Cummings, Chief Advisor to Prime Minister Boris Johnson

Abstract: Brexit and COVID-19 have fundamentally changed all of the great assumptive lathes upon which all the tools of Britain’s external reach have hitherto been forged. There has never been a more propitious moment for a truly radical re-evaluation of Britain’s vital interests and how to secure and defend them. A radical such as Cummings might just be the man to break the defence pretence from which for too long London has suffered. However, the forthcoming Integrated Security, Defence and Foreign Policy Review will need to be far more than the sum of his own prejudices...

Adding strategic value

Defence reviews are about difficult choices, the Cummings Review is no different. Given the rapidly changing and deteriorating strategic environment Britain can add most value to its own future defence, that of its European neighbours and its American allies by helping create a high-end, first responder European Future Force. Such a force must be able to operate to effect across the multiple battlespaces of air, sea, land, cyber, space, information and knowledge and NATO’s European pillar should be reformed with that single aim in mind. At the core of the force should be an Allied Command Operations European Mobile Force (based on the old ACE Mobile Force) and organised around a British-led Allied Rapid Reaction Corps and other NATO commands that has sufficient twenty-first century military manoeuvre power to block a major attack on the Alliance (supported by relevant enablers, logistics and indicators) AND sufficient military mass to support front-line states to the south dealing with the consequences of engineered chaos across the Middle East and North Africa. If Britain’s Strategic Command is to match words with deeds the creation of such a force should be central to its mission.

In the wake of COVID-19 such a vision will not only demand more defence from states like Britain but far greater synergy between European forces and a profound change of mind-set on the part of European leaders. It will also demand that in spite of Brexit Britain, France and Germany march in strategic lock-step. Therefore, establishing the foundations of a new transatlantic/European strategic partnership should the single over-arching political and strategic aim of the Cummings Review.

The Cummings Review

Dominic Cummings is essentially right – a hard rain is indeed coming to Britain’s foreign, security and defence establishment and Britain’s strategic outreach certainly needs shaking up. Brexit, COVID-19, the publication of the Russia report by the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, and the rapid deterioration in Sino-British relations are the first heavy showers of the Gathering Storm.  Closing the woeful ends, ways and means gap from which Britain’s armed forces have for too long suffered not only needs to be grounded in geopolitical reality it must also do something inimical to the Westminster and Whitehall mind – put strategy before politics in pursuit of the national rather than the political interest.

The alternative is that the Cummings Review will turn out to be yet another exercise in strategic pretence, the musings of an over-mighty defence amateur with a chance to impose his particular prejudices on a defence establishment already teetering on the edge of dysfunction.  If Cummings is to do any service to Britain’s critical national interests in the wake of the COVID-19 disaster he will also need to answer two questions that too many British governments have for too long dodged: what kind of power is contemporary Britain, and what hard power role should Britain aspire to play?  The mushy furnishings of British soft power so beloved of the London Establishment will simply can no longer afford comfort in this world. 

American and Indian forces will shortly begin a major joint military exercise. It is part of the emerging World-Wide web of Democracies that will contest the twenty-first century strategic space with China and Russia. Britain is a major strand of that web, albeit very much a Euro-Atlantic strand. Ultimately, the Cummings Review must understand that and end British strategic pretence or fail. To do that Cummings must properly consider the application of all national means in pursuit of Britain’s national interests but in the world as it is, not the world London would prefer to exist.

1922? The Geddes Axe and the then swingeing cuts to the Royal Navy set the political and strategic scene for disarmament, appeasement and ‘peace’ through weakness [more on that “Axe” here https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7640349/Geddes-Axe-a-brief-explanation.html].  Britain must not over-arm but along with its democratic allies it needs sufficient arms to convince the likes of China and Russia that peace is best served by other means. In the light the Integrated Defence, Security and Foreign Policy Review is perhaps the most important since Geddes.

Don’t screw it up, Dom!

Julian Lindley-French
http://lindleyfrench.blogspot.com/2020/07/little-britain-2-hard-rain-is-cummings.html

Start of a piece on Mr Cummings last year at the London Review of Books:

What would Bismarck do?
Christopher Clark

What​ would Otto von Bismarck, the chief architect of Germany’s 19th-century unification, do in the situation currently faced by the British government? This apparently esoteric question is more pertinent than one might think, because ‘what would Bismarck do?’ is something that Dominic Cummings, political playmaker to Boris Johnson, who has been ‘gaming’ the current crisis all summer, has often asked himself. We know this because Cummings’s sprawling and fantastically self-revealing blog (still live at the time of writing) is punctuated with thoughts about Bismarck. For Cummings, Bismarck is the sacred monster of tactical politics, the genius statesman whose political moves repeatedly surprised and wrong-footed friends and enemies alike, both at home and abroad. He may seem an improbable model for political strategising in the era of Twitter and Cambridge Analytica, but it is one of Cummings’s core convictions that sources which may seem, as he puts it, ‘very esoteric’ can turn out to be ‘extraordinarily practical’, i.e. ‘give you models for creating super-productive processes’...
https://lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v41/n18/christopher-clark/short-cuts

Mark
Ottawa
 
Swift and Bold!


Prince Philip steps down as Colonel-in-Chief of The Rifles

In a rare public appearance at Windsor Castle, the Duke of Edinburgh has handed over patronage of The Rifles to the Duchess of Cornwall.

Prince Philip held the role of Colonel-in-Chief from 2007, but his connection to the infantry regiment stretches back to 1953.

Four buglers, from The Band and Bugles of the The Rifles, came to Windsor Castle to mark the occasion and thank the 99-year-old for his service.

Camilla received the honour at a separate ceremony at her Highgrove home in Gloucestershire.


https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-asia-china-53498877/prince-philip-steps-down-as-colonel-in-chief-of-the-rifles
 
Parliament approves veterans question in next Census

Former Armed Forces personnel will for the first time be able to identify themselves as veterans in the next Census, following new legislation passed today.

The move will allow central and local government to better understand the profiles and needs of the ex-military community.

This in turn will allow for stepped up services for veterans, with better data and understanding allowing for more targeted and efficient support.

Data from the Census will be an important part of ensuring that mental health support for former service personnel is as effective as possible.

The inclusion of the question in next year’s Census has been welcomed by veterans groups and charities and builds on the government’s first ever veterans strategy, which was launched in 2018.

Minister for Defence People and Veterans Johnny Mercer said:

Allowing veterans to identify themselves in the next Census is a key step in ensuring that all of government provides the best support possible.

Better information means better support and today is a positive step forward in providing that.

Minister for the Constitution and Devolution Chloe Smith said:

The Census is an unparalleled source of information on how the UK population lives and works.

It provides a detailed picture of the nation, helping us deliver tailored public services that meet the needs of citizens of all walks of life. Ultimately it will ensure that taxpayers money is invested where it is most needed.

It is estimated that there are currently around 2.2million veterans in the UK. The rich diversity of this community underlines the importance of improving data, so that policies and support can be better targeted.

We know from previous research around the Veterans Strategy that often people are reluctant to ask, and sometimes veterans themselves are reluctant to say that they are a veteran. The process of developing the census question has therefore helped the government to develop a common way of asking if someone has served in the Armed Forces.
Charles Byrne, Director General of The Royal British Legion, said:

This is an extremely proud moment for the Legion. After leading a successful campaign, the fact that a military question will be in the 2021 Census will significantly improve our understanding of the Armed Forces community which up until now has been very limited. It will ensure that we, along with other charities and service providers, can deliver the best service possible to them when and where it is needed most.

This is something we have been striving towards for many years, it will have a huge impact on service personnel, veterans and their families well into the future, as the outcome will allow us to provide more effective care and support to those who are in need. We are delighted and are extremely grateful to everyone who has supported the campaign and helped us to achieve this historical success.

The next census is due to be held on 21st March 2021 and results will be available the following year. People will be able complete the census online on any device, with help and paper questionnaires for those that need them. The data collected will provide crucial and up-to-date insight on the diversity of society.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/parliament-approves-veterans-question-in-next-census?fbclid=IwAR0LQ9055vsfnZEpkv5I_XXBFYhesdph_Lbz9tHUeYeOzTZ9rSPn5xbgM0M
 
First Ares Armoured Vehicles Delivered to the Army

Named for the ancient Greek god of war, Ares delivers a step-change in the British Army’s battlefield capability. Last week, the first six vehicles were delivered to the Household Cavalry Regiment at Bulford, Wiltshire.

Ares, and the other variants in the Ajax family of armoured vehicles, will replace the Army’s Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked) (CVR(T)) vehicles which have been the mainstay of armoured reconnaissance for almost fifty years.

CVR(T) has proved itself on the battlefield in the Falklands and the in the deserts of the Middle East, but now requires a replacement to maintain the Army’s position as a top tier performer and to match the needs of the twenty-first century.

The Ajax family consists of Ares a troop-carrying reconnaissance vehicle, Ajax armed with a formidable 40mm cannon, support variants Apollo and Atlas, a command and control variant Athena, and an engineer variant – Argus.

Ares, part of the Ajax family of armoured vehicles, is being built by General Dynamics in Merthyr Tydfil, bringing hundreds of jobs and wider opportunities to Wales. The vehicles will give the Army’s Armoured Infantry and Strike Brigades a critical advantage over any likely opponent, through a combination of the latest technology, exemplary levels of crew protection, and, of course, our world-class professional soldiers.


https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2020/07/first-ares-armoured-vehicles-delivered-to-the-army/
 
daftandbarmy said:
First Ares Armoured Vehicles Delivered to the Army

Named for the ancient Greek god of war, Ares delivers a step-change in the British Army’s battlefield capability. Last week, the first six vehicles were delivered to the Household Cavalry Regiment at Bulford, Wiltshire.

Ares, and the other variants in the Ajax family of armoured vehicles, will replace the Army’s Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked) (CVR(T)) vehicles which have been the mainstay of armoured reconnaissance for almost fifty years.

CVR(T) has proved itself on the battlefield in the Falklands and the in the deserts of the Middle East, but now requires a replacement to maintain the Army’s position as a top tier performer and to match the needs of the twenty-first century.

The Ajax family consists of Ares a troop-carrying reconnaissance vehicle, Ajax armed with a formidable 40mm cannon, support variants Apollo and Atlas, a command and control variant Athena, and an engineer variant – Argus.

Ares, part of the Ajax family of armoured vehicles, is being built by General Dynamics in Merthyr Tydfil, bringing hundreds of jobs and wider opportunities to Wales. The vehicles will give the Army’s Armoured Infantry and Strike Brigades a critical advantage over any likely opponent, through a combination of the latest technology, exemplary levels of crew protection, and, of course, our world-class professional soldiers.


https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2020/07/first-ares-armoured-vehicles-delivered-to-the-army/

I'm willing to bet the squaddies have already changed it to ARSE.
 
Weinie said:
Look like a 113 on roids.


haha, you're right.  Didn't notice it before, but dang.  M113 went to the buff guy at the gym for his 'supplements', and came out looking beefy
 
Did I just read its a recce vehicle? And I thought our choice of the TAPV was bad for recce.....
 
MilEME09 said:
Did I just read its a recce vehicle? And I thought our choice of the TAPV was bad for recce.....

I'm just guessing here but this is the organization of a current Brit recce squadron:

Reconnaissance Squadron
Squadron Headquarters Troop - Two Land Rovers, Two FV105 Sultans and FV104 Samaritan
Three Reconnaissance Troops - Four FV107 Scimitars
Guided Weapons Troop - Four FV102 Strikers
Support Troop - Four FV103 Spartans
Mechanical Engineer Section - FV103 Spartan and FV106 Samson

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_reconnaissance_regiment

I'm presuming the AJAX takes the Scimitar's Role and the Ares the Spartans'.

There's a pretty good spec sheet here

I note this says the Ares crew is two with four dismounts - which definitely takes it out of the running as an IFV.

:cheers:
 
FJAG said:
I'm just guessing here but this is the organization of a current Brit recce squadron:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formation_reconnaissance_regiment

I'm presuming the AJAX takes the Scimitar's Role and the Ares the Spartans'.

There's a pretty good spec sheet here

I note this says the Ares crew is two with four dismounts - which definitely takes it out of the running as an IFV.

:cheers:

Wiki has a pretty good run down:

On 15 September 2015, Scout was renamed Ajax.[16] The name Ajax applied to the family as a whole, but also to the turreted variant specifically. The reconnaissance support variant was named Ares; the command-and-control variant was named Athena; the equipment repair vehicle was named Apollo; the equipment recovery variant was named Atlas; and the engineering reconnaissance variant was named Argus.[16]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_Ajax

Etc

http://www.military-today.com/apc/ajax.htm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMdHvfUDPV4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMdHvfUDPV4

The associated APC is Boxer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvACI3bB0wo
 
Defence Told To Spend More On Personnel And Less On 'Shiny' Kit To Boost Retention

A new report has used hundreds of submissions from personnel and their families among its research.

The British military has been told it must spend more on forces personnel and their families in order to improve retention.

A report, first commissioned by then-Prime Minister Theresa May in December 2018, urges defence to spend "less on shiny new equipment".

It concludes: "Defence will have to take some difficult balance of investment decisions in order to spend more money on Armed Forces personnel and their families.

"If not, within several years, there are unlikely to be sufficient qualified and experienced personnel in defence to operate the highly expensive kit in the first place," it adds.

The report used previous National Audit Office findings among its source materials, as well as more than 200 individual submissions from service personnel and their families.

It includes chapters on the impact on family and personal life, childcare, pensions and accommodation.

https://www.forces.net/news/defence-told-spend-more-personnel-and-less-shiny-kit-boost-retention
 
It's a tricky balance sometimes.


Obviously, spend on your members.  Make sure their living accomodations are comfortable and respectable, they have access to childcare, education, safe communities, etc etc.  That's a given.

Shiny kit does help with recruiting and retention too.  If it gets to a point where your kit is so ancient and behind the curve, the morale sinks all the same.
 
Back
Top