Stuart Thompson takes aim at the meaning of the charge laid against the Admiral in today's gazette.
http://montrealgazette.com/news/politics/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-breach-of-trust-charge-against-mark-norman/wcm/f3aae1b3-c64a-4453-9cdd-f9c0806a9989
Again, I have a hard time believing that the Crown is in a position to make its proof to the extent required by the Supreme Court, particularly the need to prove he was acting for a dishonest, partial, corrupt or oppressive purpose. Reading this, I am even more convinced that the charge has been laid as a result of some form of government political interference. I still think this will blow up in their face.