Flawed Design said:
On an unofficial forum where when you state you spent 2 years in the reserves you're believed. Where you could just as easy lie about your service..
Yes, because I joined this site almost 3 years ago knowing that one day someone here would say something questionable, and then
finally I'd be able to "post and run".
Flawed Design said:
I realize the more popular army.ca becomes the more (unfortunately) it draws attention from the media.
I guess it depends how one (Mike?) views army.ca ultimately.
Is this a forum for military members to meet share ideas discuss things military (while entertaining questions from civilians)
Or are we here to make the media happy and act the same way we do when Generals come to the work place- everyone is happy no one has any problems or concerns everyone is busy. Big ol dog and pony show.
Decko has the right idea. There are times when people (soldiers) get a little ahead of themselves and post something in the heat of them moment which they probably shouldn't. Bad timing though, he brought the guns out too soon.
There's nothing in this thread that's even remotely out of line for CF members (Or assumed CF members)- it's being afraid of the media boogyman IMO.
If comments such as the sinister Durka durka is enough to paint the CF monsters we have big problems.
To paraphrase the Big Cod - we're not the Public Service of Canada. That said, we're the physical (muscular) arm of the state. In holding such an auspicious role, we represent Canada, be it anonymously on the internet, or overtly overseas, downtown at the local armouries/during parades. While I wasn't in the military "back then", I think we should all be wise enough to know about minding our P's and Q's
lest they mind us. I'm sure you know what I'm referring to.
My point is different than decko's: personally I want nothing more than to stamp out the Taliban, and all of the evil shite they stand for. Furthermore, it is absolutely appropriate to want to mop the floor with those guys (within the ROEs of course - even better if they engage themselves like in this article! :warstory
- but 'those guys' must be seen as distinct from the innocent.
We are waging a war of morality over there: we are saying that certain actions, regardless of one's background
are not acceptable - reference the fiasco over the "raping your wife is OK" law. In claiming the moral and phyiscal high ground we must emphasis MUST be able to distinguish who the enemy is. My point was that making a statement like "Durka Durka", while one can defend/dodge its implications like a high-paid lawyer, we all know what it means (and so does Johnny Civilian).
I don't need to tell you that Middle Eastern culture is not our enemy, because like me, you know that the enemy are those who want to impose their culture and way of living on all others by punishment of death - we are fighting a different but very similar war against them. Our goal allows individuals to chose their own way of life, and not have it chosen for them by religious decree from an iliterate and turn-of-the-millenium nutjob.
We impose the punishment of death on those who seek to persecute and dominate an entire people, and that is why we have the moral high ground.
Now like decko (the gecko?) I will slither back into my corner so you can all continue the debate/celebration over these clowns doing our work for us - I just wanted to clarify before I did.