No bias there...Interesting take on the different types of rioters (also archived here if link doesn't work) ....
Spoiler alert: this author sees them as either Combatants, "Geezers and Scallies" and Losers.Meet the three types of rioter
unherd.com
Right?No bias there...
Let's look at the bright side - at this rate they'll run out of room in the prisons in no time, and have to rethink things...The National Police Chiefs’ Council said on Thursday that 1,127 arrests had been made since the disorder started
Supposedly they already have so are letting violent immigrants out early so they can put more online posters in jail.Let's look at the bright side - at this rate they'll run out of room in the prisons in no time, and have to rethink things...
(I gradually lost confidence in this post as I wrote it)
This is the common accepted categories when dealing with riots. The titles change a bit but the general British thinking in police and military fall in this category. Canada as well. Theres a psychologist I can’t recall the name of that’s usually linked with this as well.Interesting take on the different types of rioters (also archived here if link doesn't work) ....
Spoiler alert: this author sees them as either Combatants, "Geezers and Scallies" and Losers.Meet the three types of rioter
unherd.com
While I haven't confirmed this to be the case, it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest. Like AT ALL...Supposedly they already have so are letting violent immigrants out early so they can put more online posters in jail.
This is the common accepted categories when dealing with riots. The titles change a bit but the general British thinking in police and military fall in this category. Canada as well. Theres a psychologist I can’t recall the name of that’s usually linked with this as well.
I suspect something between "Ideologues" and "Combatants" might be a better identifier of such a group. And there would be subgroupings in there based on the ideology, too - like uber-right hyper-nationalists or uber-left ANTIFA-adjacents, or hard-core supporters of either side.... There are also the ideologues, who are there because they think they can force changes in the system in some way, or who are making a political point ...
Both of those are personality characteristics of the categories. The article is oversimplified not the category. The categories are silo’d as they are to assist with the response and how to split the crowds not to be a comprehensive psychological profile so people feel they are properly represented.Oversimplified and a largely negative/ criminal description of rioters, which is not always the case.
There's also the 'thrill seeker'. Riots are alot of fun, believe it or not, for both the rioters and the riot control forces. Which has its own range of issues for both sides.
There are also the ideologues, who are there because they think they can force changes in the system in some way, or who are making a political point. These can be the most dangerous as their commitment to 'the cause', whatever it may be, can inspire a whole host of actions that common thugs wouldn't even consider.
Both of those are personality characteristics of the categories. The article is oversimplified not the category. The categories are silo’d as they are to assist with the response and how to split the crowds not to be a comprehensive psychological profile so people feel they are properly represented.
And rioters are criminals. Riots are by definition violent disturbances of the peace. Taking part in a riot even for fun or thrills is criminal.
The three categories also apply to the police officers because it’s also accepted that there are “combatant” natured cops as well.
People taking part in demonstrations or peaceful assembly or a protest are not criminals. Rioters are.
Archive link here in case the OP link doesn't work.On hypocrisy, what-aboutism and flip-flopping.
Opinion: If you find yourself saying ‘Of course I’m opposed to violence, but’ – maybe just stop there
Even as partisans on both sides disavow terrorists’ methods, they tend to exploit terrorists’ willingness to use those methods. The far-right riots in Britain offer just another examplewww.theglobeandmail.com
Took the words right out of my mouth Booter.People taking part in demonstrations or peaceful assembly or a protest are not criminals. Rioters are.
And all each group needs are not that many "keeners" to poke the others into the shittier shit.... far right & far left are essentially the same to deal with. Whether it's an ANTIFA crowd or a far right 'extemist' crowd, both are dangerous & full of people who are batshit crazy, who can be very dangerous.
absolutely.
Including those who stoke the rage in person and online.
Very different set of facts.And it looks like the RCMP are doing the same, in Chilliwack...
Chilliwack RCMP arrest social media user over 'discriminatory' and 'racially offensive' posts
Chilliwack RCMP arrest social media user over 'discriminatory' and 'racially offensive' posts
Mounties in Chilliwack say they recently arrested one person over "discriminatory and harmful language" posted on social media.bc.ctvnews.ca
No. The accused has been public- Google Christine Loughead Chilliwack. She posted a copy of her undertaking identifying charges of Wilful Promotion of Hatred and Public Incitement of Hatred. She’s well known in the community for, eg, following and harassing minority kids, accosting minorities in the street… She posted a video of herself at a grocery store rubbing pork on Halal food preparation counters, etc. this isn’t a case of someone just saying shitty stuff on Twitter. From those who know of her antics in the community, she’s deeply and aggressively unhinged and has been for years.The thought police are real and here
. . . It is already in the UK where a person standing silent can be approached by police, questioned and threatened with arrest because the officer believes they are silent praying. In all fairness they are standing in buffer zones which prevent demonstrations, but they do not prevent someone from standing there. Get arrested for posting that you don't want your tax dollars going to immigrants which is not the party thought. Post that your thought is that all illegal immigrants should be deported and you could face jail. This is thought policing, you can only voice an opinion that is government approved. . . .
Officers intervened after they suspected she fell foul of regulations introduced last year banning people from intimidating or harassing someone within 150 metres of an abortion clinic.
Vaughan-Spruce was arrested at the Birmingham clinic just weeks after she was found not guilty for doing the same thing weeks earlier in December 2022.