• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

RPAS (was JUSTAS): the project to buy armed Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) UAVs

I was referring to Baykar’s exponential rate of progress, that at current rates will likely sling past even the RAAF and MQ-28 progress.
 
I was referring to Baykar’s exponential rate of progress, that at current rates will likely sling past even the RAAF and MQ-28 progress.

Me too...

Bayraktar is invested in getting these birds in the air. As are their partners supplying the engines - the Ukrainians.

The Ukrainians in particular are looking to solve a real world problem (killing aircraft of all types) in the very near term.

The Aussies and Americans are more invested in keeping the advantage they have held from exploiting earlier solutions - especially manned aircraft.
 
To complicate things further

JUSTAS - MALE - Sky Guardian?
CMMA - P8?

Canadian Space Agency - Radarsat
PAL - Civil air patrol

Now the USARMY is investigating Contractor Owned Contractor Operated ISR service. Think of it like Federal Fleet Services and Asterix but supplying long range ISR from civilian Challenger 650s.


 
To complicate things further

JUSTAS - MALE - Sky Guardian?
CMMA - P8?

Canadian Space Agency - Radarsat
PAL - Civil air patrol

Now the USARMY is investigating Contractor Owned Contractor Operated ISR service. Think of it like Federal Fleet Services and Asterix but supplying long range ISR from civilian Challenger 650s.


I skimmed that link and thought "this sounds like an ad". And sure enough, it totally is.

I'm not sure how it complicates anything though. The only change for the RCAF is the addition of RPAS - JUSTAS isn't a term used anymore.
 
I skimmed that link and thought "this sounds like an ad". And sure enough, it totally is.

I'm not sure how it complicates anything though. The only change for the RCAF is the addition of RPAS - JUSTAS isn't a term used anymore.

It absolutely is an ad. I think it is a US Army work around.

The US Army wants to get into long range fires. It needs precision targeting capabilities. Those need aerial assets. That means the US Air Force because the USAF is unlikely to let the US Army get into 707/737 type ISR assets.

So this becomes an off the board capability that the Army can buy - just the way the Ukrainians are buying commercial imagery.



The Canadian overlap is to do with dollars and manpower. If the government doesn't want to be seen spending more than 2% of GDP, or increasing the CAF's manpower budget then civilian contracting is a way out for them. If all you are doing is observing and reporting, especially remotely, then you don't need to be on the CAF regular strength. Those positions can be reserved for people putting themselves in harms way.
 

And, wrt the last comment about workarounds... it seems that is an issue.


In fiscal 2024, for example, the Marine Corps is asking Congress for a total of roughly $3.6 billion in its unfunded priorities list, including $1.7 billion to purchase another San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock. Meanwhile, Indo-Pacific Command is asking for $3.5 billion in its FY24 unfunded priorities list and the Space Force wants an additional $477.3 million.

Opponents counter that the lists are just a way for the services to go around the White House or OSD-level budget decisions and ultimately lead to bad outcomes for taxpayers.

But that is a digression - the bigger question is that of generating UAV operators - especially when working with Civvy peace time constraints?
 
So the RAF is establishing Swarm Squadrons ....


but....

Swarming, which means throwing enough expendable drones at a defensive radar and interceptor position so as to overwhelm them, can be effective he said, but only to a point. The idea of small and cheap drones attacking air defenses by way of swarming may not be feasible because those drones lack the requisite range and speed.

“If you want things to go fast and far, they’re going to be jet-propelled and they’re going to cost a fair bit,” Bronk said.

but....

Mini Jet


Micro Rockets


Small Ramjets





Small Jet Powered Drones in Counter UAS role


 
MQ-9A Reaper and F-16 Elephant Walk


0h13sbecn2wa1.jpg
 
Effing Millenials...."Angry Kitten"?


On the plus side -

GA-ASI integrated the EW pod in less than nine months at no cost to the USAF by using a Co-operative Research and Development Agreement.

PS

Something else for Poland to buy.

Already, Poland has purchased a distributed interactive simulation-based systems integration laboratory from the US DoD under a foreign military sales agreement in June.
 
CRADA’s aren’t necessarily no cost to the government. Quite often the Government supplies material or consumables, so the contractor can experiment.

While they are solid mechanism for innovation, I suspect that in the above case there was USAF platforms that were modified, and potentially permanently removed from (at least their own acquired purpose) service.
 
WASHINGTON, September 15, 2023 - The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Canada of munitions and other systems to be integrated into MQ-9Bs for an estimated cost of $313.4 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale today.


The Government of Canada has requested to buy munitions and other systems to be integrated into MQ-9Bs purchased through Direct Commercial Sales, to include: twelve (12) AN/APY-8 Lynx Synthetic Aperture radars; two hundred nineteen (219) AGM-114R2 Hellfire II missiles; eighteen (18) KMU-572 tail kits for the GBU-38 Joint Direct-Attack Munition (JDAM) and GBU-54 Laser JDAM (LJDAM); twelve (12) Mk82 500-lb General Purpose (GP) bombs; and six (6) Mk82 Filled Inert bombs. Also included are Due Regard Radars; SAGE 750 and SNC 4500 Electronic Surveillance Measures Systems; AN/ARC-210 radios; Compact Multi-Band Data Link (CMDL); KY-100M Narrowband/Wideband Terminals; KOR-24A Small Tactical Terminals; High-Bandwidth Compact Telemetry Modules (HCTM); KIV-77 cryptographic appliques and other Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) equipment; AN/PYQ-10C Simple Key Loaders (SKL); Common Munitions Built-In-Test/Reprogramming Equipment (CMBRE); FMU-139 Joint Programmable Fuses (JPF); M299 Hellfire launchers and training missiles; DSU-38 Precision Laser Guidance Sets; classified publications and technical documentation; munitions support and support equipment; secure communications, precision navigation, and cryptographic equipment; spare and repair parts, consumables, accessories, and repair and return support; unclassified software delivery and support; testing and integration support and equipment; maps and charts; personnel training and training equipment; transportation support; warranties; studies and surveys; Contractor Logistics Support (CLS); U.S. Government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services; and other related elements of logistics and program support. The estimated total cost is $313.4 million.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top