I'll believe it when I see it.
Doesn't show them anything. As the song says, There is none so blind as he who will not see.Show our smug political class just how meaningless and limited our "soft power" really is by excluding us from just about everything else that isn't a signed treaty.
Ah yes, but Canadian tradition is to let everything rust out and then panic at the start of the next war....Traditions are answers to questions we have forgotten.
Part of tradition should be to maintain a functional military...
Canada likes to boast that we are a leader in the international community, that our personnel are well above average, and that we fill key roles during multinational efforts. But eventually our allies won’t accept us in these key roles if we cannot actually perform, and all the easy political capital (why govt really sends us) is gone. We could be asked to step-aside as the aFP lead in Latvia, or to not bother sending that next GOFO to whatever major command in the US, NATO, or Korea. Or we could be the nation invited only for the gate guards and a novelty food DFAC.Honest question: What will NATO do? Would they kick Canada out when faced with a potential hot war with Russia?
Built off of 30 (or more) years of hard individual/collective training…Definitely not the then valid “punching above our weight” combat-experience forces of the 90s and 2000s…
Itself shaped significantly by WW2 and Korean vets!Built off of 30 (or more) years of hard individual/collective training…
And myths which may be more impressive in the telling than the reality.Itself shaped significantly by WW2 and Korean vets!
FTFY.In the early stages ofWWIIany conflict, what our militarywasis able to achievewasis in spite of, not because of, the political will in Ottawa attheany time.
as Mr Perry calls it the Quadrant of Shame
update on NATO members meeting their commitment to 2% and 20% spending thresholds
edit just a little slow on the trigger there lol
And does anyone in Government, who matters care ?
The problem is no one in NATO slapped us hard enough when Papa Trudeau pulled this stupidity in the 1970s. It emboldened successive governments to treat NATO benchmarks as a suggestion, and now we're in the fine mess we find outselves in.And does anyone in Government, who matters care ?
I suspect that we already know the answer.
For the past 5 or 6 decades we have been almost joyfully ignoring reality.
We don't want that. They might think that some time in the wilderness will smarten our government up. In reality, they just might see how small and useless we've really been and maybe not invite us back.The problem is no one in NATO slapped us hard enough when Papa Trudeau pulled this stupidity in the 1970s. It emboldened successive governments to treat NATO benchmarks as a suggestion, and now we're in the fine mess we find outselves in.
Until we get a Pink Slip from NATO saying "thanks, but no thanks.." the cycle continues.
Except the Navy does force generation during force employment, so that balance always causes friction with CJOC.For a force employment command, it has a lot of force generation and institutional functions that need another home.
Is that before or after the $800M to in service funding cuts?
15% of 1.33% is 0.2% of GDP
Capital acquisitions need to double to meet the minimum standards.
Isn't that what you actually meant?And does anyone in Government matter ?
* Snort*Isn't that what you actually meant?