I'll believe it when I see it.
True, it IS amazing but is it really surprising with this bunch?It's really amazing with everything going on, and the wide spread knowledge that we are rusting out and bleeding people that we are cutting defence.
To me it shows a Gov out of touch with what's going on in the world and Canada and one that's still trying to Govern like they just beat Harper.
I understand they've had platforms and dreamy policies, as Murphy said "No plan survives first contact". The real meaning of that is flexibility and adaptability are keys. Things this Gov simply doesn't seem to have.
they can't do anything else and still maintain NDP support. That is the key.True, it IS amazing but is it really surprising with this bunch?
As someone who has lived in the US, if you think our politics are bad…. Maybe the US could just do us all a favour and take over.
As for Justin, I believe that his wholehearted support of wokeism, massive immigration, support of multiculturalism (which, of course, is enshrined in our Constitution), lack of support for housing and other factors affecting young people and families today as well as a dislike of our military and its institutions is creating more disunity than ever before.
I’ll be surprised if his traditional audience sticks with him sufficiently to get re-elected. If he hadn’t let his ego get the better of him he would have announced his resignation as party leader and PM. Instead he has pretty much assured the savage defeat of his party in the next election. Mind you, I never like for any party to have a monopoly on control. Defeat is and should be a natural cycle in politics. Similarly, in Ontario, Doug Ford’s regime is similarly going down to defeat and will probably be replaced by a Liberal government (Bonnie Crombie?) which itself is rebuilding following the devastating defeat of Kathleen Wynn’s years ago. And so it goes on the Merry Go Round of politics.Which is precisely the approach he's used to be reelected time and again. He knows his audience really well, it seems
Umm recent vote on carbon tax might be an indicator of somehig else.they can't do anything else and still maintain NDP support. That is the key.
Yup. Threading the needle…between the NDP assumed permanent support, and a manipulative (well played, some would say) leverage of the situation to secure a well-timed round of support from the BQ. Some might ask if the NDP has it in their world to try and get back somewhat at the LPC for mixing a ‘we don’t need you (now)’ twist into the game, but to be honest, it may actually have been a savvy play on the NDPs part knowing the vote was something that the BQ would support, so that they (NDP) could play ‘bad’ cop against the ‘they’ll do anything the Libs tell them’ narrative….(appear to) vote for the middle/lower class to not slide support anymore on the issue, and still keep the agreement alive for future graft from Le Dauphin prior to the next election.Umm recent vote on carbon tax might be an indicator of somehig else.
It's really amazing with everything going on, and the wide spread knowledge that we are rusting out and bleeding people that we are cutting defence.
To me it shows a Gov out of touch with what's going on in the world and Canada and one that's still trying to Govern like they just beat Harper.
I understand they've had platforms and dreamy policies, as Murphy said "No plan survives first contact". The real meaning of that is flexibility and adaptability are keys. Things this Gov simply doesn't seem to have.
I'll believe it when the first GOFO is given a pink slip.
So career managers will be back to VTC interviews?Blair on how spending reductions will come out of administration and not operational defence capabilities.
How about all those cleaners on airforce bases have then make their own beds. Seriously though third part contracts should be looked at, like cleaners, etc to see if we are actually getting what we pay for.So career managers will be back to VTC interviews?
Or maybe we will do civilian workforce reductions via attrition (no replacement hires, but also no prioritization of which jobs are more important). It never impacts operations when there are vacancies in major procurements staff, at the local supply counter, or in the base hospital. Right?
Businesses wouldn't give people Lada funding then demand Lambourghini performance (without quickly failing as a business).Any other business would come back to the Board with a list of options for 'saving money', for Board approval, while continuing to meet the demands of their customers... or the CEO would get the boot.
I don't have any idea what's going on behind the scenes, of course, but the CAF just seems to whine alot - with no consequences