• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Incentive Pay Category For Cadets Joining The CF

Status
Not open for further replies.
Piper said:
And for the record,I was a member of an excellent cadet corps for my last 2 years and had a hoot, met some good friends and met some excellent officers (and some I wanted to throat-punch). I had a blast, but I am under no illusions about what it was, it was a fun time and a way to see some of Canada (I got to go to Alberta twice). It was a great time and cadets is an EXCELLENT youth program . But it is not something that put me ahead of my peers by any meaningful margin during basic.

What was your first couple of years like, how long were you in Cadets?
 
OK, let's not keep repeating the same thing over and over. Everybody knows where some in this thread and I am looking for new ideas to debate, not the same 'o', same 'o' that has been carrying on for some time.

I go back to this:
Scott said:
In bold, what I haven't noticed anyone say so far. I had been hoping someone would lay that one down because I do agree with it. If you are the ex-Cadet going into a BMQ section with people who have not had the benefit of that experience then I believe it to be incumbent upon that person to help the others. As a Staff member, I would be watching that former Cadet very closely. Does s/he help others or just pay attention to their own kit? Does s/he add to the team over and above what most recruits do because of this persons past? Does s/he warrant that extra money?

Only after answering these questions positively would I consider the former Cadet for a bump in pay, at that time maybe they would have earned it?
Make 'em eligible but make them earn it as well. I'm not the guy who decides, nor does it impact me personally or professionally, in short, I don't care of the outcome but do have ideas.
 
geo said:
Sig des....yup some cadets mouth off.... and become a magnet for all the negative attention of the instructors.... you should have it easier +/-

Does that merit the IPC in advance =- not really.... but it is CF policy and neither you nor I can change it's application.

Take a valium and relax

Chimo!

Geo, you're right as per the norm.....

I hate getting sucked into posting in the Cadet forum, but I really personally disagree with this policy..

Either way, as you said, it's not my place or yours, so I'll grit my teeth and soldier on....and probably ignore this thread for fear of getting torqued up again.

 
Neill McKay said:
...
Mind you, nobody here (including me) seems to know if the bit of extra money is really intended to reflect the skills of former cadets at all.  It may very well have been conceived as a small hook to get cadets to look more seriously at joining the Forces...

It is a good point - without knowing the intention it is difficult to fully discuss the topic. Then again, as long as we are aware of the unknowns...

Some have pointed out that - if the training received in cadets had direct military application you would be able to skip basic - or something similar.

But what about cadets who receive the jump course; shouldn't they receive at least a couple of week's credit?

Are there any other courses cadets take that have direct applications?
 
Now that would require some heavy duty searching and someone (I am thinking CIC) with some contacts. I am curious to know.

Not to draw too many comparisons, because it is like apples and bowling balls, but PRes pers who do 180+ Class B days are Recruit School bypasses when going RegF, are they not? They were when I was in. Also, a few years back when I threw my hat in the ring for fun, they still credited my TI with the Mo - meaning I would have still skipped St Jean, that has all since changed, IIRC, with the new course structure. FWIW

Iterator, I did my 3's with a guy who had his Cadet jump wings. He was allowed to wear them on his uniform but that was the only thing he received that the rest of us did not.

But why give credit for certain courses? A kid who did an ATC course in Air Cadets going Army, should he get credit? Should he get credit if he goes ATC? Just as an example mind you...

A new can of worms.
 
Iterator said:
Are there any other courses cadets take that have direct applications?
To some extent yes. I'm not sure about the direct CF application, but there are definitely some civilian applications.

For example, an air cadet can attain their civilian pilot's license, sea cadets can receive their radio operator's license, army cadets can receive their basic para wings.
 
Interesting thread.  Let me just say, that i can defiantely see both sides of the fence here but i think Mr. McKay had a good point.  i think when you get down to the dollars and cents, the CF would probably still be the winner.  Verbally hammer me Army.ca style if i am wrong, but isn't the point of the IPC increase because a fromer Cadet would be less of a burden on the training system, however miniscule? be it, already acustomed to a taste of military life, the 3 D's or by helping other recruits ? I mean yes, absolutley it has to do with what Squadron or Corps you come from, their are some usless ones simply said.

The Cadet program does teach a lot of Leadership, the orders process, map and compass, PT blah blah.  Consequently, one of the aims of the Cadet movement is to "instill an interest in the [insert element] of the Canadian Forces, you have to think that Dcadets and the recruiting people have obviously talked about this to set this policy ?

Really, IMHO, i don't see the big deal about Cadets getting an increased IPC, i think a recruit with cadet experience is a better asset to his platoon and the CF.  Yes, everybody get's taught the same, maybe it's outside of the classroom that counts, when the intructors are not there, that little shred of help, hint or advice.

Lastly, comparing Cadets to boy scouts is rediculous and are only similiar because both conduct training outdoors and that's speaking from direct experience. 

My take on it, not gospel until we figure the exact reason as to why cadets get an IPC increase, i guess we can agree to disagree ?

cheers

PV

 
Mr Viddy,

The main point of concern for me is why. And I still see no very good reasons posted here. However, I don't administer the program, someone smarter than me does, they must have their reasons. Hopefully they join the site and put an end to this.

I still think the increase should be earned no matter how small and I do not think that time + courses in Cadets is earning it. Time in the CF doing the job and proving yourself not to be a thud would be earning it in my eye. I am not about anyone getting anything for nothing. I was already a firefighter for a few years when I got hired full time, did I get an increase in pay over the other guys in my recruit class? Hell no. I got my first raise based on my contributions to the team, not because I had some TI and courses. Maybe it's a bad comparison but it's the only one I can draw.

Once again, I just want to see it justified and earned, not given away.

Neill McKay said:
Nor is the increase in pay really that much -- six months early getting a one-IPC increase.  Something tells me that a cost-benefit analysis would indicate that the Crown isn't getting too badly screwed by the deal.

Missed that one earlier and I agree.

 
Scott,

as usual you make a good point.  ohhh Firefighter talk, i understand that! haha. 

Yes, i agree tthat maybe it should be earned...institute a challenge test first week of BMQ or somthing ? just thoughts.


cheers

PV
 
Of course, if we really wanted to, we could ask, if Cadets supposedly makes a better soldier, why is there no credit granted at RMC, or towards an officer rank? Why do cadets not get priority for placement at RMC? Why does their time only "count" in the enlisted ranks?

Answer: Because they bring nothing to the table that cannot be taught in a week or two at BOTC.



 
Good point, GO!! Begs the question of someone like kincanucks though: Does it help on the RMC application? Would some of these 6 week courses they can take help? Example: An Air Cadet who has done ATC.

Not comparing an ATC summer camp to the trade course - Apples and Bowling Balls. Just asking if maybe a kid who had done this, had a good record, good marks, was altogether a suitable candidate for RMC, would they be given preference because of the experiences they got through Cadets?

GO!! does raise very interesting questions, I must say.

More cans, more worms.
 
Reading through this thread again has given me a new light on the subject.

I still think it is a good idea (probably because I am one of the individuals entitled to the bonus).

Maybe since there is so much controversy, the plan should be reviewed yb whichever higher ups make the rules. I believe there is already an incentive in place for cadets who progress on to become a CIC officer right away after they age out. Maybe leave that plan in place, since that is the portion of the CF that will benefit the most from a cadet who spent a few years in, since they already (typically) know the leadership and structure of a cadet unit.
 
I believe there is already an incentive in place for cadets who progress on to become a CIC officer right away after they age out.

Negative.  The only inkling of credit you will get on your basic is out of a couple of Drill classes if you meet that standard for the incredibly hard  ::)  "challenge test" .

cheers

PV
 
Well I stand corrected.

Maybe someone needs to rethink this whole thing? Let's hope the new gov't will, with their new CF budget.
 
Piper said:
You learn drill, ranks and how to shine boots...those are the only transferrable skills you get.

I've mentioned other things, but you keep ignoring them.  It's not all about "job skills" and checking off EOs.  It's about less tangible personal charcteristics, similar to how university teaches you more than the nuts and bolts of what's on the pages of your final exams.
 
Piper said:
I agree. Cadets can teach you these things. But it is not the 'end all' for these skills. What about the kid that was a camp councillor for three summers before he joined, or worked at the YMCA as a sports instructor etc etc? That applicant does not get a pay incentive.

The Forces know about the cadet programme and in fact deliver it (and further, do so in a way that aims to emulate the Forces in many ways).  Would you have a new directorate set up in NDHQ to evaluate every other youth programme in the country to assess the usefulness of its alumni to the Forces?

The powers that be think cadets are worth a special measure to attract as prospective CF members, or they believe that former cadets generally make better service members (or whatever the motive turns out to be) so they provide a modest financial bonus.  Never have I seen Service members argue so presistently about some of their mates getting a bit of something extra in their pockets.
 
Sig_Des said:
If you ever do a basic after you've been in cadets, they'll ask you at some points if anyone did cadets.

should you choose to volunteer that information, you will be told to forget about the drill you learned as a cadet, and start anew...

and do NOT argue differences in drill with your staff

Well said! I found the real drill instructors (meaning the CF ones) were very professional and superior in their drill and in their instruction of drill. We actually had a guy who tried to tell the drill instructor that he was wrong about some drill movements. He was lazy and didn't want to do them so he tried to dilude the drills. The instructor was very persistent and the lazy man backed down.

Keep up the good work CF drill instructors! Don't let any student correct you!
 
bbbb said:
Keep up the good work CF drill instructors! Don't let any student correct you!

'Cause nothing's better than an instructor who thinks he's infallible, right? ;)

Drill instructors have the same capacity to make mistakes as everyone else.  But there's a time and a place to bring it up, and that's outside of the class (and privately), not during the class.  The drill manual even goes as far as to provide that bit of direction.
 
Well said! I found the real drill instructors (meaning the CF ones) were very professional and superior in their drill and in their instruction of drill. We actually had a guy who tried to tell the drill instructor that he was wrong about some drill movements. He was lazy and didn't want to do them so he tried to dilude the drills. The instructor was very persistent and the lazy man backed down.

Keep up the good work CF drill instructors! Don't let any student correct you!

Dude, let me know the next time somone tries to correct the Course RSM on the 201 on your BOQ.  I wanna be there to watch!

cheers

PV

 
Students DO NOT ever correct an instructor. Ever. Not publicy, not privately. It is not their place, I've seen it done and it never ends well. Again, maybe it happened on your CIC course, but not on any basic I've been on (I got 'lucky' and got to do two, one as an NCO and one as an officer candidate).

oh ya, what if it was a safety issue for your platoon ? you wouldn't approach the instructor after class for clarrification ?  :-\

cheers

PV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top