there is video showing the 'anarchist black block tactic terrorist alien mind absorbing demonically possessed...' sorry where was i? they had new clothes, nice, expensive boots... all the same... maybe mil issue... anarchists without jobs can't afford too often...
http://coto2.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/500-arrested-at-g20-black-bloc-may-be-psyops/
this is to put the false flag operation, and team of 'plainclothes agents' into better perspective.
montebello is the keyword you're looking for. agent provacateurs might be useful too. there were people theorizing the same about the rbc bank incident - violence turns off lots of people, so it was thought they may have targeting 'some activist leader types' early on to get them away from the g20, or whatever other issues they were organizing for... lots of leaders were targeted - non-violent protesters, independent media - there's lots of video of police doing snatches in the middle of non-violent protest to take people out, some of whom were described as organizers... not as much video of some of the violence close range, because the media were targetted first... and none from inside (well, that we have access to everything was on video, and mic'd, in the 'film studio' short term prisons... ... don't know if that was feeding to the g20 summit too or not... stripped searched and fondled, starved protesters... you can give people bio-ch1p$ through food, orally, interestingly... after not being giving access to food, water, phone access... and targetting people differntly, like people who wouldn't know their rights... hmm you'll hear about the sexual abuse in more detail later anyways)
getting distracted... been trying to follow this as it happens.
I guess the point is, i know you really want to defend your buddies, but that's not your job; just like that's not the polices job to beat the shit out of citizens lawfully standing up for their rights, their beliefs, and Canadian values. I'm sure security forces appreciate it though when other security forces types make up excuses for them and discount media etc so they don't have to do as much work white washing the blood they spilled, the lives they ruin, and the policies, people, and lies they are really protecting.
Nuremburg says it is your duty to disobey unlawful orders, regardless of being given them from up the chain of command; obviously they only use this in practice to scapegoat people to avoid scandals of important personal doing the dirty work they want to protect, but in theory it means you don't stand up for your values, when the fit hits the shan, its on your own head: that is to say, they will use you for what they think you are good for, try and keep you stupid, and then spit you out when they are done with you.
The difference between martial arts and three weeks of killing techniques is not about who can kill the easiest, because you can teach that pretty quickly; its about being able to defend yourself, and knowing WHEN AND WHY to use those techniques; or even TO HAVE THE SKILL TO OVERPOWER SOMEONE WITHOUT HURTING THEM. When all you care about is kill ratio, and policy makers' troops are only so much fodder, these techniques are simlpy TIME CONSUMING and INEFFICIENT. Who care if you make killing machines who can't be reintegrtated into socitiety, and could wake up in the middle of the night and kill a loved one on reflex before they know its just some ptsd flashback nightmare?
I don't know what that bothers me, i have no military background... past life?
yeah see now i'm wasting your and my time ranting, when the videos pretty much speak for themselves, about who was burning what, and why. quick summary of montebello - the technique was to have operatives START VIOLENCE to justify VIOLENT REPRESSION, at least in the mainstream media, who could control and spin what was shown to keep it hush hush... its just that it was a tight knit group, and some were pretty quick on the ball.
i bet some people call them paranoid. or conspiracy theorists. possible true. possibly saved people a much worse beating that time, too. it still happened there; they just waited for the main bus loads of people to leave - that is to say, it was LESS DANGEROUS so they decided to use MORE FORCE. my intuitive interpretation of this is that they were less concerned about physical reprisals from the activists present then, or videos coming out, etc.
people grabbing person's jugulars as a 'pain compliance technique' risk killing those protesters, as the muscles in the neck that hold the jugular there are in fact, when ripped (there does not need to be any bleeding, it is a nerve response thing), what causes death from the supposed 'neck snapping' or seeing of chiropractors, etc.
I wonder if the police doing that are AWARE of this risk, or are only taught that it is useful to make someone pass out, and pain compliance: i don't like the answer, either way.
Anyways, i'm sure you've found some good links, i skipped some pages in there, so something must have come up in all this debate since my previous post on #29
You have to pick a side at some point. I don't mean Harper's, or the protesters. I mean did you sign up to kill anyone you were told to, for money; or did you sign up to stand for something, and what Canada COULD and SHOULD be. Canada is not its government; its not its land, its resources, its military, its tv. CANADA IS ITS PEOPLE, AND WHAT THEY BELIEVE IN.
I know what kind of CANADA I believe in, and its not the Canada I'm living in right now...
But the Canada I'm living in right now is where I learned the Canada I do believe in; and I think I'm not the only one.
Sorry if I wasted your time.