Thucydides said:Since Recce is:
1: expressing an opinion, and
2: expressing an opinion based on research and facts,
he is acting as an exemplary model of a citizen, and not just blindly expousing and following a "narrative". Just because people like he and I are not following your narrative does not mean we are necessarily following your opponent's narrative; as a small "L" libertarian I only find part of the CPC agenda convincing, but (sadly for the two brave and also exemplary Army.ca members who are actually running for the Libertarian Party), find the CPC is the best vehicle to get "half a loaf" of somewhat smaller government and lower taxes, since the Libertarian party in its current state is still akin to people herding cats.
I say this with a great deal of love too. I attended a Libertarian Party "Meet and Greet" for two London candidates where there were a total of 6 people in attendance besides me (including the candidates) and there was virtually no points of agreement between anyone there, hardly a winning formula for gaining and exercising political power.
So, like a lot of people (outside of thiose who would vote for a potted plant if it was branded with their party logo), I have to consider all the arguments against the evidence of the outside world and make the "least worst" choice.
No, it's the people who have spent their lives studying climate change, the nature of democracy and law in Canada, political science etc that are expressing opinions based on facts. You can disagree with some, or all of what Caplan is citing, but you can't do it with dismissive labels like "bullshit" and expect people to swallow that as truth. The fact is, our current government has made a point of rejecting all sorts of evidence and information and instead pursuing policies based on ideology. This is undeniable.
How else do you explain the end of the long form census?
Mandatory minimum sentences (which by the way, are NOT the reason for lower crime rates as that trend has been constant for decades and the Conservatives have only been in power since 2006, painfully simple stuff here) have been proven to be ineffective as a deterrent by several studies in several countries, and yet our backward government is touting them in the name of "victim's rights." The policies of this government might FEEL good, but they are not based in reality or verifiable facts. Just like recceguy's post. Nothing was actually addressed, instead the points were dismissed with meaningless rhetoric. This government has alienated even the talking heads who traditionally identify as Conservative, they're that bad.