Oh boy..
Well there ARE arguments for the FEDERAL level to be getting out of such things as Natural Resources (by giving it to the provinces) and our legal system actually is primarily run by the provinces
I mean really, this is the old de-centralization debate... Since we are in a "de-centralization" swing right now (have been roughly since the end of WWII, give or take a few relapses), plus an IMHO! excessive individualist trend brought on interestingly enough by the Welfare State and class struggle (The rich struggle to avoid taxes, the poor struggle to take more of those tax dollars, the people in the middle just throw up their hands)... .etc.
I recognize I am over-simplifying here, but the general consensus is that government should get out of my life. And your life. And his life. Furthermore, the best way to start us down this road is to kick the federal government to the curb, and let the provinces do more. And then do the same thing at the provinciail level, letting the cities do mor. Etc. When all is said and told, there is very little support for such things as "defence"..
Honestly, most Canadians have nothing to be scared about. Most assume the US would walk over here (and they probably would, with or without our consent) were a foreign force to attempt to place itself on North American Soil. (see NORTHCOM). I mean. If I was the US, thats what I would do... I sure wouldn't permit an EnFOR the option of having a nice big playground to set up in. But Im digressing. Most Canadians do not even consider it this far. Our culture talks constantly about the US getting attacked. Never about Canada. and we hear all the time about the mighty US military.
We also hear all the time about wait times (although, if I go to the ER for a cold, I think I probably should expect to wait for a while, given that head trauma's should take some priority). And so, if someone asks a poorly worded poll. (AKA: "What should have spending priority: Health, Education, Defence, etc)... well, I mean Id say health too. Followed by Education, and Defence. but I dont get to say the followed part, or say how much priority....
Plus, we are so used to just hiding behind our good semi-wannabe-neutral graces on the IR stage that spending money on defence is just a waste when you really consider it... and there really is little political capital to be gained.
I don't mean to downplay the value or the interests of our serving men and women, and their familities. What I mean to say here, is really.. if you are the PM, and you only have so many dollars... and a whole lotta hands out... and you like power - you really really like it... well, putting that money into a hand that doesnt really make many of the other hands feel good... well, thats not that great of an idea.
Canadians support our uniforms. They love it when we help out in asia, or Ghani, or Bosnia. But they quite frankly dont vote for people who spend or not spend money on the forces. It just isnt a major political issue.
(This is why I have argued it will never be a major issue until a Sep11 issue happens here)....
And to be fair, the US military has been downsized as well and was heaidng further downhill pre-9/11.... tankers were being told to kiss their MBT's goodbye post cold-war (See the Armour Blog thread and 1LT Prakash's comments in his blog on this) up until they met Iraq head on.....
Just my PoliScistudentweenie thoughts.