- Reaction score
- 492
- Points
- 780
I should have disclosed. Even though my degree is a BSc Comp Sci, I had the pleasure (and I mean it, they were interesting courses) of taking a couple of third year Poli Sci courses at Dal in the 1990s. One was (sic) Maritime Strategy and one was (sic) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. I was old enough at the time, and had already been an MH Crew commander, to recognize their worth. They gave my a better grounding in these issues then anything I was ever taught in the military. The only reason the department of Poli Sci allowed me to take them (without the normal 2nd year Poli Sci pre-requisites) was because of my military experience; we also had at least one MARS officer as well.
Interestingly, they both had two professors in the seminars (they didn't really do lectures); one was the actual professor, but one was an older lady who just provided wisdom. Although I forget her name, she was in some way part of the Canadian negotiation team for UNCLOS. Gives one a completely different insight...
One of the most interesting things we did was full weekend seminar (and nobody complained). Each person was given a different role in either the Government of a fictitious island nation (ie "President", Minister of Defense, Minister of Economy, Chief of Defense, etc) or another stake holder organization (CEOs of oil companies, neighboring nations, etc). We then held rounds of negotiations over some of the pressing maritime issues of that nation (offshore exploration, how much to spend on the Navy, etc). It certainly made a much better learning environment then the EOs and POs of a standard military course!
Anyway, that is where my grounding in this stuff comes from; it's enough of a grounding that it's pretty easy to find the relative factual information on the internet. Too bad more journalism majors didn't take these types of courses...
Rant on: why is it that BSc students have to take a sprinkling of liberal arts courses (which is a good thing!), but BAs and MBAs don't have to take any science courses. Maybe if more people had a first year university level understanding of the scientific method than there would be so many BS opinions floating around???
Interestingly, they both had two professors in the seminars (they didn't really do lectures); one was the actual professor, but one was an older lady who just provided wisdom. Although I forget her name, she was in some way part of the Canadian negotiation team for UNCLOS. Gives one a completely different insight...
One of the most interesting things we did was full weekend seminar (and nobody complained). Each person was given a different role in either the Government of a fictitious island nation (ie "President", Minister of Defense, Minister of Economy, Chief of Defense, etc) or another stake holder organization (CEOs of oil companies, neighboring nations, etc). We then held rounds of negotiations over some of the pressing maritime issues of that nation (offshore exploration, how much to spend on the Navy, etc). It certainly made a much better learning environment then the EOs and POs of a standard military course!
Anyway, that is where my grounding in this stuff comes from; it's enough of a grounding that it's pretty easy to find the relative factual information on the internet. Too bad more journalism majors didn't take these types of courses...
Rant on: why is it that BSc students have to take a sprinkling of liberal arts courses (which is a good thing!), but BAs and MBAs don't have to take any science courses. Maybe if more people had a first year university level understanding of the scientific method than there would be so many BS opinions floating around???