I think their argument goes like this:
When the Government cuts funding for schools, government loans and scholarships and puts twice the money insted into marketing for the army and training programs in the army that come with compulsory service. They are strategically limiting the options for a select group of people that is the poverty draft. Now by failing to enforce regulations to stop discrimination in society or provide other opportunities towards some visible minorties it is similar to a poverty draft.
I think I said that I found it to be a poor argument, but still, as I said before cohesive with their overall belief structure. (Which says that the government is responsible for providing opportunities for everyone) :