• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Chinese Military,Political and Social Superthread

Supposedly it was an MPP
John McCallum 2019 you say ....


McCallum cautioned Beijing about a change in government, according to a recent interview​




IMHO McCallum sold his soul to the devil a long time ago.
 
Terry Glavin reports the Tories have their own problems with CCP infiltration, which sounds like was responsible for ousting O’Toole.

The plot thickens. Will Pollievre kick out these pro-Beijing elements?

Trying to absorb this a bit.

It’s clear the Chinese wanted an LPC minority win.

They didn’t want O’toole. And they engineer a party ousting. (I surmise they thought if he stayed he had a good chance of beating the LPC in the next election)

Would part of their calculation be that PP was more acceptable choice as CPC leader either because:

A) they thought he was unelectable nationally?
B) until recently he was rather quiet on relations with China?

This web keeps widening.
 
Trying to absorb this a bit.

It’s clear the Chinese wanted an LPC minority win.

They didn’t want O’toole. And they engineer a party ousting. (I surmise they thought if he stayed he had a good chance of beating the LPC in the next election)

Would part of their calculation be that PP was more acceptable choice as CPC leader either because:

A) they thought he was unelectable nationally?
B) until recently he was rather quiet on relations with China?

This web keeps widening.
Not quite the same as the Manchuria Candidate but there’s definitely a lot of intrigue. Let’s say that MPP in Ford’s government or the other person working at the federal level were actually doing what they have been accused by the media of doing, could charges be laid? Would sedition be an appropriate charge? What are the legal possibilities? And let’s not forget John McCallum.
 
Trying to absorb this a bit.

It’s clear the Chinese wanted an LPC minority win.

They didn’t want O’toole. And they engineer a party ousting. (I surmise they thought if he stayed he had a good chance of beating the LPC in the next election)

Would part of their calculation be that PP was more acceptable choice as CPC leader either because:

A) they thought he was unelectable nationally?
B) until recently he was rather quiet on relations with China?

This web keeps widening.

He is seen as more divisive than O'Toole. And so far, it seems like they've been right.

Definitely time to call in Orkin.

Beijing for the win!

Dischord and Distrust.

Edit - With any luck at all Antifa will be back out in the streets facing down against Hutterites and truckers.
 
Trying to absorb this a bit.

It’s clear the Chinese wanted an LPC minority win.

They didn’t want O’toole. And they engineer a party ousting. (I surmise they thought if he stayed he had a good chance of beating the LPC in the next election)

Would part of their calculation be that PP was more acceptable choice as CPC leader either because:

A) they thought he was unelectable nationally?
B) until recently he was rather quiet on relations with China?

This web keeps widening.
I am not sure if Pollievre has anything to do with these latest machinations in the Conservative Party, but I too noticed that he was quiet on China, unless it was as an attack point on Charest and Brown (who both had unseemly Beijing connections as well). Maybe the CCP had something to do with convincing other more credible candidates to stay out of the race? Or maybe my tinfoil hat is on too tight?
 
He is so greasy…
Emperor Palatine? May the Force be against him.

I recall some of the many blunders McCallum made as Minister of Defence 3 decades ago. For example, he had never even heard of the Dieppe Raid. Imagine the head of MND saying that. Or how he confused the Battle of Vimy Ridge in WW1 with the Vichy French regime of WW2. I’ll bet you he knows more about the history of the Long March by the Chinese communists than he does about what our fathers and grandfathers did in the WW2 and Korea.
 
He is so greasy…
THIS is what the RCMP should be investigating in cooperation with CSIS to determine:

1. If there was any collaboration by Canadian citizens with Chinese officials and to what extent;

2. Identify those Canadians and determine to what extent they collaborated;

3. Determine if any sitting politicians benefitted from the collaboration, and if proven to have benefitted have the election results declared null and void.

I am not hunting witches. I fully realize that some may have acted under duress - threats to your family will ensure you cooperation.

I would like a cop and a lawyer to weigh in on this.

Oh and let's expel a few "diplomats" as well.
 
THIS is what the RCMP should be investigating in cooperation with CSIS to determine:

1. If there was any collaboration by Canadian citizens with Chinese officials and to what extent;

2. Identify those Canadians and determine to what extent they collaborated;

3. Determine if any sitting politicians benefitted from the collaboration, and if proven to have benefitted have the election results declared null and void.

I am not hunting witches. I fully realize that some may have acted under duress - threats to your family will ensure you cooperation.

I would like a cop and a lawyer to weigh in on this.

Oh and let's expel a few "diplomats" as well.
I suspect the ChiCom influence was so pervasive that many decent politicos and bureaucrats were simply overwhelmed and began to accept it as a reality. But I am convinced that some sold their souls and morally sold out their country to gain personal financial enrichment. Mind you, some may have been committing outright sedition. I’m with you in that it would be interesting to hear from some of the police and legal minds here. I’d be surprised if any diplomats would respond but, hey, I’ve been surprised before in this room
 
I do like my timelines....

Draft - without attribution


2017

National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, which reviews national security matters and promotes “government-wide accountability.”

Established by Trudeau in 2017, it reports to the Prime Minister.

March 10 2017

McCallum appointed Ambassador to China

December 2017

Last December, while introducing legislation to outlaw foreign interference in Australian politics, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull told the Australian Parliament that the scale of the threat to Australian democracy and sovereignty from foreign influence campaigns was “unprecedented.” Turnbull did not name any country in particular, but the proposed laws were clearly aimed primarily at Chinese covert interference.





May 28 2018

China's 'brazen' and 'aggressive' political interference (in Australia) outlined in top-secret report

By Stephanie Borys

Posted Mon 28 May 2018 at 3:28pmMonday 28 May 2018 at 3:28pm, updated Mon 28 May 2018 at 11:03pm


June 17 2018

Vincent Ke elected Conservative MPP for Don Valley North

June 28 2018

Australia Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme Act passed to address Chinese influence attempts

August 13 2018

US bans Huawei

August 23 2018

Australia bans Huawei

November 28 2018

New Zealand bans Huawei

December 1 2018

On December 1, 2018, Huawei's board deputy chair Meng Wanzhou was detained upon arrival at Vancouver International Airport by Canada Border Services Agency officers for questioning, which lasted three hours.[1][2] The Royal Canadian Mounted Police subsequently arrested her on a provisional U.S. extradition request for fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud in order to circumvent U.S. sanctions against Iran

December 10 2018

Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme comes into effect in Australia


On December 10, 2018, Michael Kovrig was detained in Beijing around the same time as Michael Spavor,





January 2019

a “Special Report” prepared by the Privy Council Office for the Trudeau government and was date-stamped January 2022. The memo was also finalized, suggesting it was intended to be read by Trudeau and his senior aides.

Reviewed by Global News, it asserted that Chinese officials in Toronto had disbursed money into a covert network tasked to interfere in Canada’s 2019 election.

“A large clandestine transfer of funds earmarked for the federal election from the PRC Consulate in Toronto was transferred to an elected provincial government official via a staff member of a 2019 federal candidate,” the PCO report stated.

A national security official explaining this report to Global News said the finalized memo was about intelligence gleaned from an ongoing, high-level probe in the Greater Toronto Area launched in January 2019.

Intelligence sources say the provincial official named in connection with the alleged clandestine transfer from the Toronto consulate is a member of Ontario’s legislature.


January 28, 2019

On January 28, 2019, the U.S. Department of Justice formally announced financial fraud charges against Meng.[4][5]

In February 2019, Hong Kong authorities proposed legal revisions allowing criminal suspects to be extradited to mainland China, where due process rights are routinely violated. This prompted massive, largely peaceful protests starting in June. While authorities scrapped the revisions, they have ignored other demands, including for an investigation into excessive use of force by the police, while imposing new restrictions on expression and assembly.

Solidarity protests[edit]​



On 9 June, at least 29 rallies were held in 12 countries with protesters taking to the streets in cities around the world with significant Hong Kong diaspora, including about 4,000 in London, about 3,000 in Sydney and further rallies in New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, Toronto, Vancouver, Berlin, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Perth, Canberra, Melbourne, Brisbane and Taipei.[275][276] In one of the biggest overseas protests, hundreds of demonstrators made of mostly Hong Kong immigrants filled the streets outside the Chinese consulate-general in Vancouver with yellow umbrellas, referencing the 2014 Occupy protests, and chanted against the extradition law. More than 60 people gathered outside the White House in Washington to protest against the bill.[276]

On 12 June, representatives from 24 Taiwanese civic groups, including Taiwan Association for Human Rights, protested outside Hong Kong's representative office in Taipei, whilst shouting slogans such as "Taiwan supports Hong Kong."

On 16 June, 10,000 Hong Kong students and Taiwanese supporters held a peaceful sit-in at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei to support the protests in Hong Kong.[277][278] In Auckland and Adelaide, around 500 people gathered to demand Chief Executive Lam to withdraw the bill and apologise for her actions.[279] On 17 June, 1,500 people protested outside the Chinese Consulate in Vancouver.[280]

On 23 June, 5,000 people held a rally in Taipei against Hong Kong's extradition bill.[281] On 14 July a "Sing for Hong Kong" event was held in London.[282][283] There was a clash between pro-democracy and pro-China supporters at the University of Queensland in Brisbane on 24 July.[284][285] In response to the incident, the Chinese Consul-General in Brisbane, Xu Jie, reportedly praised Chinese students for confronting "anti-China separatist" protesters, prompting the Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne to warn foreign diplomats not to interfere in free speech and protests in Australia.[286][287]

On 3 August, further solidarity protests occurred in UK cities including London, Manchester and Edinburgh, as well as Canadian cities of Montreal, Vancouver, Toronto, Winnipeg, Halifax, Ottawa and Calgary.[288][289][290] On 10 August, around 100 Hong Kongers, Tibetans, Taiwanese, Uygurs, overseas Chinese and other New York residents held a rally outside the Chinese consulate.[291] Over the 16–18 August weekend, solidarity pro-democracy protests were held in London, Edinburgh, Melbourne, Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, Taipei, Berlin, Paris, Boston, Calgary, Vancouver and Toronto.[292][293][294][295][296][297][298][299]

On 30 August, hundreds of Tibetans marched in India's capital in a show of solidarity with protesters in Hong Kong. Taking a cue from them, many of the Tibetans carried umbrellas and wore black as they joined the New Delhi demonstration organised by the Tibetan Youth Congress.[300]

Protesters in the concurrent 2019 Catalan protests have claimed inspiration from, and solidarity with the Hong Kong protests.[301][302]

On 13 November, Xi Jinping visited Brazil. A few Hundred Brazilian protestors gathered in Brasilia to show their support to the Hong Kong protestors.

Counter-protests[edit]​

Simultaneously, counter-protests organized by pro-China and overseas mainland Chinese groups occurred in several cities in the Western hemisphere, including Sydney, Melbourne, Ottawa, Toronto, London, and Paris; some of which led to confrontations between the opposing groups and arrests.[303][304][305][306][307] On 2 October 2019, a confrontation between rival student protesters at the University of Sheffield led to the arrest and suspension of one student.[308]

June 9 2019



June 15 2019



June 17 2019


August 3 2019




August 17 2019


August 19 2019


August 21 2019


August 28 2019


August 30 2019

Global News also learned of an earlier, high-level warning about clandestine funding of China’s “preferred candidates” that came from a bipartisan panel of parliamentarians two months before the 2019 election.
As part of its mandate, NSICOP undertook a special review of the threat facing Canada from foreign interference and Ottawa’s response to it, according to its chair, MP David McGuinty.

“The Committee heard testimony from dozens of officials from the Canadian security and intelligence community, reviewed thousands of pages of documentation, both classified and open source, and deliberated at great length,” read a March 2020 statement from McGuinty, adding that the resulting reports “were submitted to the Prime Minister on August 30, 2019.”

The information came from Canada’s National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, which reviews national security matters and promotes “government-wide accountability.”


The 2019 NSICOP review on foreign interference alleges that “foreign states clandestinely direct contributions to,” Canadian politicians.

Under the subtitle, “Targeting the Political Nomination Process and Preferred Candidates,” the report says that “targeting often begins during the nomination process.”

After the nomination process, the review continues, “foreign states clandestinely direct contributions to and support for the campaigns and political parties of preferred candidates.”

While the document did not examine specific interference activities directed at the 2019 federal election, it offered several examples of alleged Chinese election interference from 2015 to 2018 that involved the targeting and funding of candidates.

“A [People’s Republic of China] Embassy interlocutor founded a group of community leaders called the ‘tea party’ to hand-pick candidates that it would support and ultimately publicly endorse,” it says.
It added that a “former PRC Commercial Consul informed PRC businesses of the rules regarding Canadian political contributions and ‘urged particular business leaders to donate through Canadian subsidiaries and acquisitions.’”

Global News has examined an unredacted copy of the NSICOP review, which has not been made public.

In November, Global News first reported on intelligence from the January 2022 “Special Report,” which revealed allegations of a sophisticated election interference network orchestrated by the Chinese consulate in Toronto to interfere in the October 2019 contest.

The group allegedly involved at least 11 candidates and 13 or more aides. Sources also said an Ontario MPP played a role and that the group included Liberals and Conservatives who were both witting and unwitting participants.

In the same story, Global News also reported that this “clandestine transfer of funds” allegedly involved the consulate using a regime-friendly group to act as an intermediary to disburse about $250,000 to the staff member of a 2019 federal candidate, according to sources. The aide then allegedly transferred the funds to alleged network members.

September 3 2019


October 21, 2019

The 2019 Canadian federal election was held on October 21, 2019. Andrew Scheer

Han Dong elected Liberal MP for Don Valley North


a “Special Report” prepared by the Privy Council Office for the Trudeau government and was date-stamped January 2022. The memo was also finalized, suggesting it was intended to be read by Trudeau and his senior aides.

Reviewed by Global News, it asserted that Chinese officials in Toronto had disbursed money into a covert network tasked to interfere in Canada’s 2019 election.

“A large clandestine transfer of funds earmarked for the federal election from the PRC Consulate in Toronto was transferred to an elected provincial government official via a staff member of a 2019 federal candidate,” the PCO report stated.

A national security official explaining this report to Global News said the finalized memo was about intelligence gleaned from an ongoing, high-level probe in the Greater Toronto Area launched in January 2019.

October 18 to 27 2019

Wuhan Military Games

December 2019

First CoVid victim described in Wuhan







January 20 2020

The first stage of the extradition hearing for Meng began Monday, January 20, 2020,

January 25 2020

Canadian Covid Patient Zero

February 2020

a PCO memo delivered to the PMO four months after the 2019 election alleged that China was covertly transferring money to preferred candidates.

“Community leaders facilitate the clandestine transfer of funds and recruit potential targets,” it said.

Beijing’s “extensive network of quasi-official and local community and interest groups allow it to obfuscate communication and the flow of funds between Canadian targets and Chinese officials.”

Also, according to the document, community leaders and “co-opted” political staffers “under broad guidance” from the Toronto consulate served as intermediaries between Chinese officials and the politicians Beijing was seeking to influence.

The outcome of these operations, the document says, is that “staff of targeted politicians provide advice on China-related issues” to the Chinese consulate.

The document added that other network operators handle financing and attempt to recruit Canadian politicians.

It also warned that influence operations such as these were “likely to be more persistent and pervasive in future elections.”

To date, former public safety minister Bill Blair is the only senior Liberal government official to acknowledge receiving the February 2020 PCO memo

April 10 2020

RCMP told to enforce the Quarantine Act

May 27 2020

May 27, 2020, when the Supreme Court of British Columbia ordered the extradition of Meng to proceed

July 14 2020

UK bans Huawei

September 17 2020


Australia’s Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme, or FITS, which became the model for the foreign-agent registry that former British Columbia Conservative MP Kenny Chiu proposed in his private member’s bill tabled in 2021. It became the subject of a disinformation campaign on Chinese-language social media that likely contributed to his defeat in that year’s federal election.





September 20 2021

The 2021 Canadian federal election was held on September 20, 2021, Erin O'Toole

pro-Beijing influence operation that targeted the Conservatives, especially during the leadership of Erin O’Toole, and the pro-Beijing forces weren’t finished with O’Toole after the poll results came in on the night of Sept. 20, 2021.
O’Toole’s Conservatives came to voters in 2021 with an extensive position that called for a 180-degree turn away from the Trudeau government’s China-centric policies. Among other things, O’Toole’s policy called for restraints on Chinese state-owned enterprises in Canada, a ban on Huawei from Canada’s core 5G infrastructure, closer relations with Taiwan and the establishment of a foreign-influence registry.

Beijing was furious. Chinese ambassador Cong Peiwu blasted O’Toole for adopting a “hostile” blueprint that was aimed at “smearing” China. The Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda organs referred to O’Toole’s policy as catering to a “toxic atmosphere” that would surely invite a “strong counterstrike.”

These same lines of attack were taken up by Joe Li, a councillor in Markham, Ontario and spokesman for the Chinese Canadian Conservative Association who maintains close relations with several prominent figures affiliated with the United Front Work Department, Beijing’s overseas influence-peddling operation. In the days after the Conservatives’ election loss, the knives came out.

Speaking on behalf of the CCCA, Li said the Conservative policy under O’Toole was a “hatred message.” Li said Canada should not criticize China’s human rights record, that “Canada started the war” that led to the Michaels’ abduction by apprehending Huawei heiress Meng Wanzhou, and that China was right to be sending warplanes into Taiwan’s air-defence zone.

September 24 2021

On 24 September 2021, the US Department of Justice announced it had reached a deal with Meng to resolve the case through a deferred prosecution agreement.
Meng left Canada for China on 24 September 2021;

hours after news of the deal, Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig, two Canadians whose detention were widely seen as retaliation for Meng's arrest, were released from detention in China and flown back to Canada.

November 15 2021

On November 15, Conservative senator Denise Batters called for a referendum on O'Toole's leadership, saying that O'Toole "flip-flopped on policies core to our party" including a carbon tax, firearm regulations and abortion.[91] Conservative Party president Robert Batherson ruled that a referendum to call a leadership review was "not in order". Two days later, O'Toole responded by removing Denise Batters from the caucus, saying anyone "who's not putting the team and the country first, will not be part of this team."[92]




January 2022

two intelligence reports, from 2019 and 2022, raise questions about what senior federal officials knew about the alleged funding by a foreign interference network and how seriously the Trudeau government took the warnings.

One is a “Special Report” prepared by the Privy Council Office for the Trudeau government and was date-stamped January 2022. The memo was also finalized, suggesting it was intended to be read by Trudeau and his senior aides.
Reviewed by Global News, it asserted that Chinese officials in Toronto had disbursed money into a covert network tasked to interfere in Canada’s 2019 election.

“A large clandestine transfer of funds earmarked for the federal election from the PRC Consulate in Toronto was transferred to an elected provincial government official via a staff member of a 2019 federal candidate,” the PCO report stated.

January 22 2022

Canadian Covid Convoy

January 31 2022

On January 31, 2022, Conservative Calgary Heritage MP Bob Benzen submitted a letter with signatures from 35 Conservative MPs calling for a leadership review on O'Toole's leadership to the Conservative caucus chair, Scott Reid. In the letter, Benzen criticized O'Toole's reversal on repealing Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's carbon tax and assault weapons ban.[93]

February 2 2022

On February 2, 2022, O'Toole was ousted as leader in a vote by Conservative MPs according to the terms of the Reform Act.[94][95] By secret ballot, O'Toole was removed as leader by a margin of 73 votes to 45.[96][97] The vote forced his removal, which took effect immediately.[98]

In 2022, O'Toole expressed his belief that Chinese interference had played a role in the Conservative Party's loss during the 2021 Canadian federal election in an interview with Liberal MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith on Smith's UnCommons podcast. O'Toole opined that interference by Chinese Communist Party linked outfits could have cost the Conservatives up to "eight or nine seats.

O’Toole had established a remarkably robust party policy, co-authored by Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Michael Chong and drawn from consultations with Uyghur refugees, Hongkongers and Chinese human rights activists. Going into the 2021 election, the lines were clearly drawn.
While O’Toole’s ouster was seen mostly as a rebuke from the party’s right flank for moving too close to the centre and losing the election in the bargain, the coup was initiated by Bert Chen, an Ontario member of the party’s national council. One of Chen’s complaints was O’Toole’s China policy. But well before O’Toole’s election to lead the Conservatives in 2020, wealthy Chinese businesspeople were suddenly showing up among the Conservative party’s donors and membership rolls.

One recent immigrant who stands out is Ted Jiancheng Zhou, a property developer with condominium projects in Ontario and China. Zhou, who boasts intimate connections in China’s Communist Party hierarchy, was among the hundreds of super-rich Chinese who maxed out their legal contributions to the Liberal party during Trudeau’s “cash for access” engagements with pro-Beijing Chinese millionaires in 2016.

But then he appeared to switch. Although he wasn’t yet a citizen and had been in Canada less than five years, Zhou established ten separate organizations across Canada devoted to drawing Chinese-Canadians into the Conservative party. The NDP and the Liberals asked federal Election Commissioner Yves Côté to look into whether Zhou’s activities were in violation of election spending laws, but the complaint went nowhere.
After the 2021 election loss there was alarm among some Conservatives that the party leadership had decided to back off on China, to “go soft.” Those concerns were heightened when the Conservatives opted to suspend the Canada-China Relations Committee in place of a committee to look into the Afghanistan debacle and the apparent abandonment of Canada’s Afghan interpreters by the embassy in Kabul. But the China committee was soon back up again, and Chong insisted at the time that the Conservatives weren’t backing down on China at all. Nominally, O’Toole’s China policy was adopted by the current leader, Pierre Poilievre. But Poilievre hasn’t been particularly vocal on China-related issues, at least he wasn’t until CSIS documents started showing up in the hands of reporters last November.
There’s little dispute that Beijing’s election-interference operations in 2021 cost the Conservatives dearly, almost certainly two ridings, and O’Toole has suggested that as many as eight or nine ridings may have been lost owing to a well-documented Beijing-directed disinformation operation.

What’s even less clear is why Conservative complaints about the operation to the Critical Election Incident Public Protocol panel went unheeded during the 2021 election. While the former public servant and Trudeau Foundation CEO Morris Rosenberg last week reported that his review of the panel’s work properly concluded with a clean bill of health, it doesn’t appear that he spoke with any of the Conservative Party’s campaign officials about their complaints.

February 14 2022

Canadian Emergencies Act

February 21 2022

On February 21, the House of Commons voted to confirm the Emergencies Act, with 185 for and 151 opposing the motion.

February 23 2022

On February 23, Trudeau told a press conference that he would lift the Emergencies Act at 5:00 p.m.

February 24 2022

Russia invades Ukraine

May 19 2022

Canada joins 5 Eyes (ACANZUS) in banning Huawei and ZTE

December 7 2022

Chinese Secret Police in Richmond BC






March 9 2023

Chinese Secret Police in Montreal and Brossard

 
Last edited:
Kirkhill, that’s an excellent summary of events. I’m suspect that additional investigative journalism will soon fill in your timeline with more shocking revelations. Thanks for posting.
 
So if this isn't new why is it a surprise....?

Dan Lett - Winnipeg Free Press


Tories target China​

You might remember that the Conservatives under O’Toole demonstrated a clear and persistent obsession with China in the 2021 election.

In a really swell bit of election analysis, rabble.ca found that the Conservative platform document — the one with a picture of O’Toole in a tight black T-shirt — referred to “China” or “Chinese” 41 times. As rabble detailed, the specific references included comments about China’s “growing authoritarianism” and its efforts to undermine “democratic norms, institutions, and the rule of law.”

“We must stand up to the Communist government of China,” the Tory campaign document noted. “The communist leadership represents a clear and rising threat to Canadian interests — and our values. They’ve abducted our citizens, targeted our economy, and intimidated members of the Chinese Canadian community.”

Which brings us back to O’Toole’s most recent attempt to demonize China.

What possible tactical advantage could the Tories be trying to create by doubling down on talking points that some of their own defeated candidates believe may have cost them seats?

Let’s try out one theory. The Conservative leadership contest continues to be dominated by MP Pierre Poilievre, who is seen as the clear favorite. A Leger poll released this week had him as the preferred choice of 44 per cent of Conservative voters; the next-closest challenger — former federal PC leader and Quebec premier Jean Charest — had only 14 per cent support.

Let it be said that if — and this is a pretty huge “if” – China attempted to influence the outcome of Canada’s 2021 federal election, they might have had good reason.

Joking. There is no good reason for any foreign country to meddle in the electoral affairs of another country. But there is little doubt now that the Conservative party and its former leader, Erin O’Toole, are working surprisingly hard right now to convince people that China worked in the shadows of the Internet to hurt the party’s chances in 2021, when it (for the second election in a row) drew more voters but fewer seats — and lost again to the Liberals.

On the June 16 episode of CBC radio’s The House, O’Toole told host Chris Hall Chinese interference impacted the outcomes in at least nine seats, most of them in British Columbia’s lower mainland and Toronto.

O’Toole said the meddling — much of it involving fake narratives being pushed on WeChat, the social media platform developed by Chinese multinational Tencent — would not have changed the final vote. However, he insisted the interference was verified by an internal party review of election results.

On its face, it’s not such an outlandish allegation, given that Chinese cyber-terrorists are a real thing. This week, for example, Canadian federal security agencies confirmed an “unprecedented and indiscriminate exploitation” of Microsoft Exchange services by state-sponsored Chinese hackers.
 
Back
Top