OceanBonfire
Sr. Member
- Reaction score
- 392
- Points
- 1,080
Ummm... flight deck? <frantically checks notes...>Unless the awning over the flight deck for cocktail parties is missing. That would bring the entire process to a grinding halt.
And here looks to be the counter point. I don't have access behind the paywall so I'm aware of all that is being said. If anyone else can post the complete article that would be great.Full steam ahead: Why Canada's shipbuilding program oughtn't to be abandoned or cut | Macdonald-Laurier Institute
Richard Shimooka examines how the Canadian Surface Combatant program emerged, what its progress has been to date and why the outcomes are reasonable.www.macdonaldlaurier.ca
a decent write up on the process so far
Alan Williams has a bit of a bias; I think he was part of a losing bid. His previous op-eds were full of untruths and conjecture, so don't think you are missing much.And here looks to be the counter point. I don't have access behind the paywall so I'm aware of all that is being said. If anyone else can post the complete article that would be great.
Canada has no option but pivot away from current Surface Combatants path
This program alone could bankrupt DND's capital and maintenance accounts for the next 30 years. It could inhibit the Canadian Armed Forces from fulfilling its mandate.www.hilltimes.com
And here looks to be the counter to the counter point.And here looks to be the counter point.
He was also on record as saying, “just because we’re [Canada] joining the JSF Program doesn’t necessarily mean we’re going to buy the JSF.”Alan Williams has a bit of a bias; I think he was part of a losing bid. His previous op-eds were full of untruths and conjecture, so don't think you are missing much.
Well historically one can argue there is a long line of precedents...He was also on record as saying, “just because we’re [Canada] joining the JSF Program doesn’t necessarily mean we’re going to buy the JSF.”
View attachment 67983
That is true actually. You don't have to own the aircraft to be part of the program. They are separate things. I don't have to golf to be part of a golf club, just gotta pay the membership fee.He was also on record as saying, “just because we’re [Canada] joining the JSF Program doesn’t necessarily mean we’re going to buy the JSF.”
True, but your membership vote is but one of many, and if the club votes overall to adjust rules of the club based on how the playing members in the majority want to operate the club and you don’t like the changes, you risk being told ‘whatever…you don’t even play’ and then you get to pound sand.That is true actually. You don't have to own the aircraft to be part of the program. They are separate things. I don't have to golf to be part of a golf club, just gotta pay the membership fee.
I believe being part of the development process allowed Canadian companies to provide components to the aircraft. Not sure what will happen if we don't buy any but there are some Canadian companies providing key systems as well as some sensors (metal detection in the oil?), and from the economic projections I remember seeing the economic benefits for that actually exceeded our JSF program costs by a lot.True, but your membership vote is but one of many, and if the club votes overall to adjust rules of the club based on how the playing members in the majority want to operate the club and you don’t like the changes, you risk being told ‘whatever…you don’t even play’ and then you get to pound sand.
The JSF Program reserved the right to adjust industrial involvement in a number of factors; direct program funding by Level 1,2 and 3 partners being but one factor, procurement impact is another. Canada isn’t quite at Turkey buying an S-400 and getting turfed level, but without actually procuring the aircraft, there’s only so much value that the overallI believe being part of the development process allowed Canadian companies to provide components to the aircraft. Not sure what will happen if we don't buy any but there are some Canadian companies providing key systems as well as some sensors (metal detection in the oil?), and from the economic projections I remember seeing the economic benefits for that actually exceeded our JSF program costs by a lot.
If we don't buy any not sure if they will source another supplier out of the pool, but that would probably make sense.
This infrastructure will be critical in testing the new CSC ships’ combat systems and will ensure the new ships are sea-ready once delivered. As there are no existing facilities capable of supporting this type of testing for CSC in Canada, we are delivering this new, purpose-built testing facility to carry out this work as part of the CSC’s rigorous tests and trials program.
Given what happened to LETE - which was a World Class Land System testing site -- I am sure it will be bulldozed and sold.Hopefully once the CSC closes out it becomes a state if the art facility for testing all future naval systems and designs.