OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 15,529
- Points
- 1,260
When you live close to a bear's den you tend to take precautions against the bear a bit more seriously.Yes, but they don’t have the same hangups about conscription as the Brits, or us.
When you live close to a bear's den you tend to take precautions against the bear a bit more seriously.Yes, but they don’t have the same hangups about conscription as the Brits, or us.
I know Sweden had conscription for a very long time, but I was shocked that a defence chief was publicly warning the public of war in Sweden of all places. Not what I had on my bingo card.Yes, but they don’t have the same hangups about conscription as the Brits, or us.
It was hardly a surprise considering that Sweden set aside just over two centuries of neutrality to first join the EU and then NATO.I know Sweden had conscription for a very long time, but I was shocked that a defence chief was publicly warning the public of war in Sweden of all places. Not what I had on my bingo card.
But that would require strategic thinkers in Ottawa... of which we have very few in Government or Opposition.I was actually talking about the Brits.
God knows we could really do with some sort of mobilization plans .
Think of this as an exercises in strategic planning.
I know I'm repeating myself but all parties poll assiduously and honestly, which is to say that they really are interested in what we, the voters, think and want. I've been told, by sources I consider very reliable that both the CPC and LPC hear exactly the same thing: Canadians don't care about national security and defence; they don't care that we are "laggards" and "freeloaders;" most don't think any significant increases in defence spending are necessary (at least that was the case several months ago); some think the defence budget should be cut; there is near zero support for any cuts to any "entitlement" to offset higher defence spending. Candidates reported, publicly, hearing the same at the door in the 2021 election campaign.But that would require strategic thinkers in Ottawa... of which we have very few in Government or Opposition.
Everyone is laser focused on Election 2025 and keeping/gaining power. "Mobilize for war" is definitely not a vote catcher for anyone of any political stripe in Canada
I'm not surprised to be honest.I know I'm repeating myself but all parties poll assiduously and honestly, which is to say that they really are interested in what we, the voters, think and want. I've been told, by sources I consider very reliable that both the CPC and LPC hear exactly the same thing: Canadians don't care about national security and defence; they don't care that we are "laggards" and "freeloaders;" most don't think any significant increases in defence spending are necessary (at least that was the case several months ago); some think the defence budget should be cut; there is near zero support for any cuts to any "entitlement" to offset higher defence spending. Candidates reported, publicly, hearing the same at the door in the 2021 election campaign.
You know it’s bad when the Air Force is trailing behind the Navy in how they view their superior officers.Survey says... much improvement required:
Happiness in RAF at lowest recorded level as survey shows military morale tumble
Service life satisfaction among RAF personnel has dropped to its lowest level since attitudes were first surveyed in 2007.
Results from the UK Regular Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey 2023 show satisfaction with service life across the military has fallen for the second year in a row.
They also showed that attitudes towards financial-related aspects of service life have continued to decline, among the 9,176respondents.
In addition, levels of satisfaction with some aspects of Service Family Accommodation – including quality of maintenance/repair work – has fallen considerably since last year.
General service life
Satisfaction with service life across the services has fallen for two consecutive years, by 8 percentage points, from 50% to 42%, from 2021 to 2023.
It returns the figures to the level previously reported in 2018.
Satisfaction among RAF personnel has fallen to its lowest level since the question was first asked in 2007.
Army personnel are the most likely to be satisfied with service life (45%), with RAF satisfaction (37%) coming into line with figures for Royal Navy and Royal Marines personnel (36% and 37%, respectively).
Officers also show a consistently higher satisfaction level with service life than other ranks.
Around a third of personnel feel valued by their service – 34% in 2023, down from 41% in 2021.
Money
Satisfaction with the rate of basic pay has fallen markedly in the last two years, returning to its lowest recorded level – 31%.
The same proportion of personnel agree that the pay and benefits they receive are fair for the work they do, down from 46% in 2021. 51% disagree.
Furthermore, satisfaction with allowances has fallen 18 percentage points since 2021, to 39%, back in line with 2012 levels.
These decreases may have been influenced by cost-of-living pressures and the rise in inflation.
Accommodation
Satisfaction with the overall standard of Service Family Accommodation (SFA) has fallen from 52% in 2022 to 46%.
Since last year, satisfaction with responses to requests for maintenance/repair work of SFA has fallen markedly – from 32% to 19%. The figure has fallen from 42% in 2015.
Similarly, satisfaction with the quality of maintenance/repair work of SFA has fallen by 8 percentage points to 19%, dropping from 37% in 2015.
Leadership and management of change
RAF personnel (17%) are the least positive about how well change is managed in their service – compared with Royal Navy (19%), Royal Marines (32%) and Army (27%).
Members of the RAF (18%) are the least likely to agree they have confidence in the leadership of their service, compared with Royal Marines (43%), Army (37%) and Royal Navy (28%).
Attitudes towards RAF senior leaders have fallen for the second year in a row, to their lowest-ever levels. The figures show that RAF personnel are the least positive about their senior leaders compared to the other services.
Happiness in RAF at lowest recorded level as survey shows military morale tumble
The UK Regular Armed Forces Continuous Attitude Survey 2023 shows satisfaction with service life has fallen for second year in a row.www.forces.net
Or add this: When the CAF can't respond to a national weather emergency IE floods in MB, super rain in BC, Ice storms etc in Ont and PQ.I'm not surprised to be honest.
At the same time, its disheartening to know that the same population that has no desire to properly fund or equip our armed forces is the same one that will be calling for blood when their loved ones are obliterated in a missile strike that proper AD would have possibly prevented.
Paper boots and the Ross Rifle come to mind in all of it.
I know I'm repeating myself but all parties poll assiduously and honestly, which is to say that they really are interested in what we, the voters, think and want. I've been told, by sources I consider very reliable that both the CPC and LPC hear exactly the same thing: Canadians don't care about national security and defence; they don't care that we are "laggards" and "freeloaders;" most don't think any significant increases in defence spending are necessary (at least that was the case several months ago); some think the defence budget should be cut; there is near zero support for any cuts to any "entitlement" to offset higher defence spending. Candidates reported, publicly, hearing the same at the door in the 2021 election campaign.
Or add this: When the CAF can't respond to a national weather emergency IE floods in MB, super rain in BC, Ice storms etc in Ont and PQ.
THAT my friend is when they will whine and cry. NOT until then.
The question may not be rhetorical, but I doubt anyone in the know will be saying anything outside of a SCIF.So the leadership is following the followers.
If the people are not perceiving a threat, are the leaders perceiving a threat? When the military leadership discusses threat levels with the civilian leadership, what type of reception do they get?
The question is not rhetorical.
Based on the "Foreign Interference" responses and "Convening" I doubt if I will be pleasantly surprised.
One wise politician once said that the secret to successful political leadership was to figure out which way the mob has headed and then rush out to lead them there.So the leadership is following the followers.
If the people are not perceiving a threat, are the leaders perceiving a threat? When the military leadership discusses threat levels with the civilian leadership, what type of reception do they get?
The question is not rhetorical.
Based on the "Foreign Interference" responses and "Convening" I doubt if I will be pleasantly surprised.
Not really surprising to me... NWOs get a bad name, but some of the best people I have worked for are NWOs, and some of the worst were in RCAF DEU.You know it’s bad when the Air Force is trailing behind the Navy in how they view their superior officers.
To be fair, most folks in the Navy think what you do is akin to black magic anyway, so they are extra nice lest you put a hex on them or somethingNot really surprising to me... NWOs get a bad name, but some of the best people I have worked for are NWOs, and some of the worst were in RCAF DEU.
Just because someone calls you by your first name does not mean they are actually good at being a leader. Air force experiences vary, particularly if you happen to be in a job that isn't aircrew or aircraft maintenance.
That's the way that it is but the fallacy in that is that it presupposes that the purpose of government leadership is to be re-elected rather than leading the nation and taking necessary action in the public's best interest.One wise politician once said that the secret to successful political leadership was to figure out which way the mob has headed and then rush out to lead them there.
Perhaps float the idea of closing military bases, such as Valcartier or Esquimalt and watch heads explode.I know I'm repeating myself but all parties poll assiduously and honestly, which is to say that they really are interested in what we, the voters, think and want. I've been told, by sources I consider very reliable that both the CPC and LPC hear exactly the same thing: Canadians don't care about national security and defence; they don't care that we are "laggards" and "freeloaders;" most don't think any significant increases in defence spending are necessary (at least that was the case several months ago); some think the defence budget should be cut; there is near zero support for any cuts to any "entitlement" to offset higher defence spending. Candidates reported, publicly, hearing the same at the door in the 2021 election campaign.
maybe Valcartier but the Islanders would cheer. Victoria seems to hate the navy. Just think of all the house boats they could tie up there if it wasn't for all those dirty noisy grey thingsPerhaps float the idea of closing military bases, such as Valcartier or Esquimalt and watch heads explode.