- Reaction score
- 6,482
- Points
- 1,360
Because nobody wanted those jobs.......don't make it seem like anything but that.
Bruce Monkhouse said:Because nobody wanted those jobs.......don't make it seem like anything but that.
Bird_Gunner45 said:Semantics yes, red herring no. It's semantics, but important semantics. Using the proper vernacular is key in advancing an argument.
As for the Irish, stating that the treatment of the Irish isn't the same as slavery doesn't somehow take away from the treatment of the Irish. Same as black people in Charlottesville being upset about a statue put up during a period of southern revisionism to celebrate or romanticize a slave culture doesn't detract from the Irish experience either. Both can co-exist without detracting from the other.
mariomike said:FDNY Recruitment Attracts Record 61,000 Candidates
http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/FDNY-Recruitment-Attracts-Record-61000-Candidates-130233118.html
Bruce Monkhouse said:Yea...in 2012. Get a grip, don't post figures from the turn of the last century and use a link from this century to "prove" something.
daftandbarmy said:And how many Irish Catholics?
Halifax Tar said:I think you need to do some reading on the Irish experience from 1169 (English/Norman invasions) onward.
Bruce Monkhouse said:It was low-life public service jobs or go south and get used to "undercut slave labour."
Let that sink in....
Bruce Monkhouse said:Except they were none of those things at the time.
Bruce Monkhouse said:Your argument is like saying "picking cotton must be really cool, all the black people down south do it". :
mariomike said:They never were, "low-life public service jobs".
Civil service jobs in big city departments always offered- at the very least - employment security, a guaranteed 40-hour week income, benefits and a pension.
That included a union. In the US, NYPD unionised in 1892 and FDNY in 1917.
( In Toronto, police, fire and ambulance have been unionised since 1918. )
Not all jobs offered that in the past, or present.
I won't dignify that with a reply. :
Halifax Tar said:Then NYPD traces its 1854 when it took over from a "night watch" system
FDNY goes back to 1648.
Not sure I would insinuate that these services were always secure employment with benefits and pensions.
Not to mention the hazards that came and continue to come with these professions.
mariomike said:I heard lots of explanations why people - first, second and third generation Irish, and others - decided to apply.
Contribution to society, satisfaction received from helping others, being an active member of the community.
Maybe those things were important to some, maybe not.
Others wanted a job with a future, that was exciting and far from routine, with guaranteed security.
mariomike said:Who had "secure employment with benefits and pensions." in 1854 and 1648?
There were lots of hazardous professions in 1854 and 1648. There still are.
Insinuate: "Suggest or hint (something bad or reprehensible) in an indirect and unpleasant way."
Not sure I did that. I believe I have been polite.
Halifax Tar said:That sounds like a more modern list of reasons to join. I'm not sure Mick O'Toole from the Bronx circa 1876 would have the same feelings.
mariomike said:At least "Mick O'Toole from the Bronx circa 1876" was eligible to apply. And was likely assigned to an Engine or Ladder company.
"William H. Nicholson became the first Black man on November 7, 1898 to join the FDNY. About a month later he was advanced to 4th grade fireman and made $800 a year. Nicholson was assigned to Engine Company 6 in Brooklyn. He faced discrimination, however. When he arrived for duty, orders had been received from fire headquarters that read, “When William H. Nicholson reports for duty, send him to headquarters. He is detailed to the Veterinary Department in Manhattan.” Nicholson worked for the department for 14 years as a horse groom."
http://amsterdamnews.com/news/2017/sep/12/fdny-150/
I remember reading of "black bunks" reserved in FDNY firehouses.
Ref: Firefight: The Century-Long Battle to Integrate New York’s Bravest
By Ginger Adams Otis
That's something "Mick O'Toole from the Bronx" never had to tolerate.
Halifax Tar said:Im not sure what we are debating...
Halifax Tar said:I'm not sure Mick O'Toole from the Bronx circa 1876 would have the same feelings.
Halifax Tar said:I think you need to do some reading on the Irish experience from 1169 (English/Norman invasions) onward. These people were violently; and with extreme prejudice, oppressed on their own land by a foreign power for hundreds of years. The victimhood of racism isn't solely owned by races and colors other than white.
You cannot discuss the Irish in America with out digging into the roots of the emigration from Erin and the Irish diaspora. Not to mention the Irish Catholics, during the Potatoe Famine and US Civil War, were not exactly welcome on the shores of the USA unless they were to be used as fodder for the US Civil War.
Halifax Tar said:Honest question. I don't see how it all equates.
Halifax Tar said:I think you need to do some reading on the Irish experience from 1169 (English/Norman invasions) onward. These people were violently; and with extreme prejudice, oppressed on their own land by a foreign power for hundreds of years. The victimhood of racism isn't solely owned by races and colors other than white.
Halifax Tar said:Unless you trying to show that the Irish are racist too ? To Which I would reply of course there are/was Irish racists. Just like there are racists in all bodies of colors and creeds.
mariomike said:You don't?
mariomike said:Nobody called anybody a racist.