Yeah a soldier in a car driving by would have made all the difference.
Remember a few years back when the Québec Hell's Angels were deliberately targeting members of the law enforcement community? That's pretty damned close to unlimited liability in application but not name.Unlimited liability eh ? The difference between a civilian and soldier.
Remember a few years back when the Québec Hell's Angels were deliberately targeting members of the law enforcement community? That's pretty damned close to unlimited liability in application but not name.
I find that the term "unlimited liability" gets used too much as an excuse crutch. It comes with terms and conditions also.....
You don't follow the order to jump off the building just because we only brought 5 ropes and the parade commander wanted 6 rappellers.
Accepting Unlimited Liability
Unlimited liability is a concept derived strictly from a professional understanding of the military function. As such, all members accept and understand that they are subject to being lawfully ordered into harm’s way under conditions that could lead to the loss of their lives.
Just saying it gets used like a billy club in debates it has no reason to be in.....Its the legal term use another if you'd like.
Section 2 : Fundamental Beliefs and Expectations - Canada.ca
The military ethos speaks to and affirms certain beliefs and expectations about military service that serve to develop the military members’ professional self-portrait.www.canada.ca
CAF members are compelled to follow the lawful commands of their superiors. Your example is not only hyperbolic but would be unlawful.
Just saying it gets used like a billy club in debates it has no reason to be in.....
When military folk debate with LEO's...."oh yea, well we have unlimited liability and have to follow orders."
As you yourself pointed out above, no you don't...
Small anecdote. Years ago when they started active shooter training at OPS it was passed on to me via a few people I know that there that a lot of members did not want that training as they didn’t want to have to go in and engage. Apparently anyone with military experience was keen on it though.
We should note when we had an active shooter on parliament hill a few short years ago we saw video evidence of a lot of RCMP members heading towards where the gunfire and shooting was happening.
I think military types bring up Unlimited liability because it’s a known concept to us and it’s hard to conceive that certain jobs like firefighting, LEOs or what not don’t have that same concept. To be honest I think civilians think the same way, that police should charge in headstrong regardless of danger.
We can point to UL as something unique to the military but I think we need to recognize that it is that. Unique. And not try to project that onto other professions. Not saying anyone is but just something to keep in mind.
Mm hm. And even at that, police do go, time and time again, into really dangerous situations alone or with minimal backup. Moncton involved several members killed in individual interactions while trying to stop an active shooter. Fredericton, similarly. And lots more where police simply win the fight without taking casualties, so the public doesn’t notice it.I think the difference is when I/C section base orders a team to enter a space and stop the ingress of water, that is a lawful command; and the expectation is that injury or death is acceptable in completion of that task, and refusal of that task for fear of injury or death is punishable.
But to be honest its two very different professions and its not a fair comparison. One is meant to preserve peace and order and the other is meant to establish it through violence.
Mm hm. And even at that, police do go, time and time again, into really dangerous situations alone or with minimal backup. Moncton involved several members killed in individual interactions while trying to stop an active shooter. Fredericton, similarly. And lots more where police simply win the fight without taking casualties, so the public doesn’t notice it.
So it’s not that police aren’t frequently and selflessly standing into danger. It’s just that that last step to ‘unlimited liability’, being ordered into a tactically necessary death, isn’t a thing.
And I pretty much loved my 32 years(except for obvious certain moments) of the job.
Different strokes....
While I disagree about the word "huge", there's a whole other thread on this topic.Absolutely and that's why police make huge salaries.
The public only thinks about the physical harm. Emotional harm and moral harm are the real long term hazards that go unseen on the nightly news.Their job is often more in harms way than CAF members. No debate. And that's also why the expectation of the public is that they will stride toward danger and lay down their lives.
Blame Hollywood for that. The hero cop. The glorious death in the line of duty. Saving the mom and child from a predator who looks like Jack Nicholson with one shot, one kill.Perhaps we need more education on the role of police....
While I disagree about the word "huge", there's a whole other thread on this topic.
Of the 1065 people listed in the sunshine list for the HRM 454 of them are listed as police.
Halifax releases 2021 sunshine list: Of more than 1,000 employees making more than $100,000, 454 are police - Halifax Examiner
Halifax Regional Municipality has released its 2021 sunshine list, showing 1,065 employees made more than $100,000 in the last fiscal year, and more than 40% of them work for the police force. The municipality has released the list annually since 2016, and the 2021 edition was posted online on...www.halifaxexaminer.ca
Seem like good pay to me. Feel free to split this.
The public only thinks about the physical harm. Emotional harm and moral harm are the real long term hazards that go unseen on the nightly news.
Absolutely, and our injured officers should be looked after.
Blame Hollywood for that. The hero cop. The glorious death in the line of duty. Saving the mom and child from a predator who looks like Jack Nicholson with one shot, one kill.
Sometimes the job is like looking into a garbage can full of snakes.
There are points in our careers (Police, Military, Fire ect) when you suck back and realize this is what we singed up to do and this is why the crown or tax payer has paid us. When in those situations we need to make peace, find internal courage and carry on with the task. Sometimes we carry those situations with us for life. Either way its what we're paid to do. All services like these should have robust aftercare packages that accompany the wounded for life.
With OT because of staffing shortages, unforeseen events etc. I see this as normal. Happens all the time in my agency.Of the 1065 people listed in the sunshine list for the HRM 454 of them are listed as police.
andAbsolutely, and our injured officers should be looked after.
There are points in our careers (Police, Military, Fire ect) when you suck back and realize this is what we singed up to do and this is why the crown or tax payer has paid us. When in those situations we need to make peace, find internal courage and carry on with the task. Sometimes we carry those situations with us for life. Either way its what we're paid to do.
YMMVAll services like these should have robust aftercare packages that accompany the wounded for life.