- Reaction score
- 21,938
- Points
- 1,260
She’s going to roll and plead.I guess we’ll see, but it will be interesting to see how her case in Federal Court goes, or whether she pleads in that as well.
She’s going to roll and plead.I guess we’ll see, but it will be interesting to see how her case in Federal Court goes, or whether she pleads in that as well.
She’s not presently indicted in the federal Jan 6th case. She’s unindicted co-conspirator number 3 in that one. While some here have objected to speculation about who might flip, I think we can safely assume Jack Smith will keep tugging at these threads to turn coconspirators into cooperating witnesses. I won’t be surprised if we see some of the rest indicted soon in Washington.I guess we’ll see, but it will be interesting to see how her case in Federal Court goes, or whether she pleads in that as well.
Isn't that the way the system is designed, leveraging one against the other? It seems to me that helps a prosecutor do their job. There is nothing like a person involved in events to testify against others.Sidney Powell sold herself, now she has to sell others out of self preservation. Rats and ships…
“Plea bargaining is a defining, if not the defining, feature of the federal criminal justice system” (Brown and Bunnell, 2006:1063)
Isn't that the way the system is designed, leveraging one against the other? It seems to me that helps a prosecutor do their job. There is nothing like a person involved in events to testify against others.
Here is a piece about federal plea bargaining.
Article Link
Thank you for that. I always look forward to your thoughts on these subjects.Completely agreed, at least in the case of the US (it happens here, it’s just a lot harder to pull the levers). I guess the takeaway is if you’re absolutely determined to do criminal conspiracy, make sure you’re not the one at the top, and be ready to make a quick exit while there’s still a relatively soft landing.
Well I’ll be - he didn’t actually intend to “drain the swamp”??!!?!!?!I’m still wondering how anyone can support DJT at this point.
As more and more dominos come down, it’s pretty obvious that the biggest creature in the Swamp is he.
God I love that scene. “Shorty was a cop”Well I’ll be - he didn’t actually intend to “drain the swamp”??!!?!!?!
During last year's presidential campaign, George W. Bush expressed contempt for "nation-building." In the October 3, 2000, debate, he warned: "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. I'm going to prevent that."
It wasn't new - its gone on for a long time.I had my memory cells jarred today.
United States non-interventionism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
…so nine more to plead?Four out of 14 defendants have now plead guilty.
You mean 'alleged conspiracy' right?Another update: a day after Powell’s guilty plea to misdemeanours, co-accused and former Trump lawyer Kenneth Chesebro has now plead guilty to a felony count of conspiracy to file false documents relating to the fake electors scheme.
Remember when I said yesterday that there would be more guilty pleas, with a diminishing rate of return? Exactly what we’ve seen here. And now the prosecution has two of Donald Trump’s lawyers pleading guilty and avoiding jail time in exchange for become State’s witnesses. Also notable that Powell and Chesebro participated in quite different facets of the larger overall conspiracy.
Next I suspect we are a number of the fake electors plead guilty for reduced sentences. They may not have as much to offer the prosecution, but will recognize they’re well and truly up a creek now. Classic ‘prisoner’s dilemma’ playing out in real time.
Kenneth Chesebro Pleads Guilty in Fulton County Election Subversion Case
Read more here.www.democracydocket.com
No. The existence of a criminal conspiracy is now cemented in at least one guilty plea. What remains alleged is the specifics of certain fact sets as they pertain to certain co-accused who remain before the courts.You mean 'alleged conspiracy' right?
Nothing is cemented by a guilty plea in the US, particularly one to much less than the full weight of charges. It's well-established that the US plea-bargaining system moves some people to plead out simply to avoid cost, stress, and a risk that a jury will throw a prosecutor a bone by finding guilt on one or two charges amidst a barrage of charges.
The only way to cement anything is to go to trial and prove it in court.
Trump is innocent until proven guilty by the courts. Just because someone else flips and pleads guilty, whether true, false or to get a better deal, is not on Trump. Not until he has his day and his attorneys have a chance to exonerate him and question the floppers allegations in open court. Until his judgement comes down, his involvement into whatever they, the media and the prosecution say, is only alleged. Otherwise, as you contend, Trump needs no trial. Get a bunch of floppers to say he's guilty and it's all done.Given that this entire part of the discussion is about criminal prosecutions, yes it is, in every way that matters, subject to the limitations I described. A conviction via guilty plea constitutes something being proven in court. It’s a conviction every bit as meaningful and consequential in every way as one delivered by a jury or a judge.