• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trump administration 2024-2028

People vent shit out loud. "It was a clear night, why didn't 'x' happen?"
Well then, we've found POTUS47's social id :)

Not that anyone would read anything into it as a world leader commenting on an event ....

The haters will jump all over every nuance like it means anything. While ignoring the bigger picture.
As haters on all sides will do over every other politician they don't like.
 
Well then, we've found POTUS47's social id :)

Not that anyone would read anything into it as a world leader commenting on an event ....


As haters on all sides will do over every other politician they don't like.
One can just contrast it with what the VP tweeted out.
 
Perhaps, but unless he plans to just camp them there until they die (under some kind of authority), I'm not sure what he would plan to do with them. Even being an 'enemy of the state' probably doesn't bring them under military law.






Some examples of how Guantanamo might be used as a deterrent? The idea is to create a viable, if not pleasant, alternative to bringing people to their final destination and gifting them all the things they were seeking, ie clothing, shelter, income, medical services, schooling, jobs...

The detention facilities can be both humane and unfulfilling.
 
"This is a bad situation that looks like it should have been prevented." Perfectly reasonable thing to say.
How about the second-guessing of the tower team's actions, all while first responders were still at work?

Boss speculating while the 2 i/c offering condolences/some level of sympathy after the same air disaster is an interesting leadership team combo.

Meanwhile, on a more aesthetic note, this is a pretty damned good shot ....
1738257003659.png
 
How about the second-guessing of the tower team's actions, all while first responders were still at work?

I'm not sure he was second-guessing anyone, to be honest.
Boss speculating while the 2 i/c offering condolences/some level of sympathy after the same air disaster is an interesting leadership team combo.
Agreed. That said, DJT is one to wear his heart on his sleeve.
Meanwhile, on a more aesthetic note, this is a pretty damned good shot ....
View attachment 90888
Yes, and this time around, of note is the subtle shift in the US: FLOTUS and her kids, etc, all wore designer stuff made specifically for the occasion.
 
I'm not sure he was second-guessing anyone, to be honest.
Then we'll have to respectfully agree to disagree on our respective reads of this bit: "Why didn't the control tower tell the helicopter what to do instead of asking if they saw the plane?"
... FLOTUS and her kids, etc, all wore designer stuff made specifically for the occasion.
True enough, although as nice looking as FLOTUS is in general, the evil bitch in me notices a hint of perhaps ... softening? FLOTUS's face in the portrait :) Quite the reverse of her husband's portrait.
 
Here's a simple way to curry some favour with the Trump administration. Get involved with this:

At least his timing is good: we had Star Wars / SDI in the 80s, Missilery Defence (a few interceptors in Alaska) in the 2000’s, and iron Dome in the 2020’s; so every 20 years.

Now we know why every country needs to spend 5% of it’s GDP in NATO, because there’s a good chance that’s what it will cost.

Good time to be a defence contractor I guess.
 

Saw this in another thread. Will reply in this thread.

Pulling security details for partisan reasons is absolutely disgusting. If the legit threat is present due to past senior government service, protection should be provided. There’s nothing political about that. The amount can always be scaled up or scaled down.

Unfortunately we have the administration itself sticking the targets to certain people’s backs with the rhetoric they have employed and encouraged.

Nice of him to say such kind words about Dr. Fauci.

Trump pulls Fauci’s security, wishes him ‘nothing but peace’​

 
No, fascists people are fascists, and fascist people make fascist laws:
Fascism:
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.


Regulating immigration doesn't make one fascist, FFS.
 
Fascism:
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, a capitalist economy subject to stringent governmental controls, violent suppression of the opposition, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.


Regulating immigration doesn't make one fascist, FFS.
Did you even read the article? The bill as a whole isn't the issue, it's the part where they want to make voting on certain policies illegal: "a provision that creates a Class E felony for public officials who vote to adopt or enact sanctuary policies." Think about that; they want to make it illegal for duly elected officials to vote their conscience if their conscience doesn't agree with them.
 
Back
Top