• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Trudeau Popularity - or not (various polling, etc.)

DND and CAF suffer from extreme financial management illiteracy. If an O-6 finance officer doesn't know the difference between operating costs and assets, there's a problem.

Most "finance" in DND/CAF is poor quality accounting and compliance activities conducted by under- or un-qualified individuals.

Unfortunately, the GiC has no desire to improve; believe it or not, you can be a senior PS finance officer (CT-Fin 4, old FI-4) without formal training or a professional accounting designation.

That lack of knowledge, in turn, restricts what can be done. On the other hand, knowledgeable folks can be a huge force multiplier. I know of one reserve brigade where the class A MMTs in the service battalion were able to do their acquisition role and actually support the bde units to execute things that were always low priorities for the support bases, but that made material differences to the units.

TL;DR proper training and education in finance is needed to improve DND/CAF outcomes.
 
If high interest rates are a big source of limiting economic growth, what is the big concern about lowering those interest rates at this point in the game?

Could lowering those interest rates somehow crash our economy?

(Which, when contracting for the 6th consecutive quarter, is called a recession everywhere else in the world...)
Just re-read my post from early early this morning and realize it makes no sense as written.

Disregard.
 
Lower interest rates tend to increase inflation - lower borrowing costs, aka "cheap money". Inflation is the reason interest rates are higher than they used to be, so what would be the point of lowering them again and whipsawing ourselves between periods of high inflation and high interest rates?
I posted my question far earlier in the day before brain was functioning...sorry
 
Just re-read my post from early early this morning and realize it makes no sense as written.

Disregard.

Nothing before coffee ;)

Tired Tom And Jerry GIF by Death Wish Coffee
 
That lack of knowledge, in turn, restricts what can be done. On the other hand, knowledgeable folks can be a huge force multiplier. I know of one reserve brigade where the class A MMTs in the service battalion were able to do their acquisition role and actually support the bde units to execute things that were always low priorities for the support bases, but that made material differences to the units.

That is the direction I was pushing 36 Svc before the Navy snatched me back. I would like to see the Svc Bns become the field and garrison support organizations for their CBGs. And I think its possible.
 
That is the direction I was pushing 36 Svc before the Navy snatched me back. I would like to see the Svc Bns become the field and garrison support organizations for their CBGs. And I think its possible.
Our local Svc Bn has been doing a lot of that this year. Provided a field kitchen for us on ex and sent some guys over to assist on our annual stocktaking and ATI.

The CO there is keen to do that sort of thing.
 
Our local Svc Bn has been doing a lot of that this year. Provided a field kitchen for us on ex and sent some guys over to assist on our annual stocktaking and ATI.

The CO there is keen to do that sort of thing.
You gotta love a proactive CO
 
Our local Svc Bn has been doing a lot of that this year. Provided a field kitchen for us on ex and sent some guys over to assist on our annual stocktaking and ATI.

The CO there is keen to do that sort of thing.
Are people not thinking broadly when requesting support? We used to have field kitchens from the local service battalion and the local artillery unit, and a couple of time the cooks from the naval reserve unit (no trailer, but all the other equipment needed).
 
Are people not thinking broadly when requesting support? We used to have field kitchens from the local service battalion and the local artillery unit, and a couple of time the cooks from the naval reserve unit (no trailer, but all the other equipment needed).
As always situation, timing and stars aligning. But there is an open offer that can be taken up.
 
A quarter century ago the complaints were that CAF members were living in RHUs all their career and never building up home equity.

The solution was to incentivize home ownership.
A quarter century ago the CAF was looking to get rid of expenses and liabilities (which on base housing is) and divested it pretending it was in the members favour. The fact the housing market was magnitudes cheaper than it is now made it a easier sell.

Short term thought processes for long term pain.
 
And I suspect sometimes, personalities can enter the chat when there’s less than stellar co-operation, no?
I think we underplay the importance of personalities and networking when things go well too.

When the "stars align" often times it's due to the fact that two or more people have made an effort to support one another beyond just doing what they had to do.
 
A quarter century ago the CAF was looking to get rid of expenses and liabilities (which on base housing is) and divested it pretending it was in the members favour. The fact the housing market was magnitudes cheaper than it is now made it a easier sell.

Short term thought processes for long term pain.
The Ontario government, and I suspect the entire federal government, lost interest in being a residential landlord except where unavoidable, around that time.
 

Its messy but there it is.
__________________________________________________
TOP STORY


In a bid to combat Canada’s acute cost of living crisis (what Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland has called the “vibe-cession”), the Trudeau government has rolled out a pair of handout packages. One, a temporary GST holiday. The other, $250 rebates for everyone (well, everyone who’s earned employment income in the past year).

Advertisement 2

STORY CONTINUES BELOW


TRENDING


Article content


The NDP have argued that the $250 should be distributed more broadly, and the Conservatives have criticized the whole thing as a cynical ploy.

Lost in the debate is the fact that $250 is … not much. It’s about seven hours of work for the average Canadian, or two days if you’re working minimum wage. But in the context of the skyrocketing costs of living that have roiled Canada during the premiership of Justin Trudeau, $250 buys surprisingly little as compared to just 10 years ago.

Below, a cursory look at how far $250 goes in 2024 Canada.


It doesn’t quite cover one month’s worth of rent increase

In the fall of 2014, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation recorded that the average Canadian rent was $828 per month for a one-edroom and $918 per month for a two-bedroom. Adjusting for inflation, that’s equivalent to about $1,064 and $1,179 in 2024 dollars.

As per the most recent rental survey, it’s now $1,359 for a one-bedroom and $2,049 for a two-bedroom. So, if you’re renting a one-bedroom, $250 only covers about four fifths of the $295/month premium you now pay in rent as compared to 2014.




Article content


If you’re renting a two-bedroom, you now pay $870/month extra as compared to 2014. So, $250 will cover about 10 days’ worth of that.

If you’d received $250 every month for the last 10 years, you still wouldn’t be able to afford a down payment

Ten years ago, the average home in Canada cost the inflation-adjusted equivalent of $525,000 ($408,795 in 2014 dollars). Assuming a 20 per cent down payment, you’d need the 2024 equivalent of $105,000 cash to buy one.

As of this writing, the average Canadian home price is $696,166, meaning a 20 per cent down-payment now costs $139,233. In other words, buying an average Canadian home in 2024 requires about $34,000 more down-payment than it did in 2014.

Now, imagine the federal government was giving you a $250 cheque not just once – but every single month for the last 10 years. If you had saved every single one of those 120 cheques, you would have $30,000.

It accounts for two weeks’ worth of the extra income you would have had under 2014 growth rates

Right up until 2014, Canada had hewed pretty close to the U.S. in terms of GDP growth. But starting right around the election of Trudeau, the U.S. kept growing while Canada’s economic performance stagnated. Capital investment plummeted, and Canadian productivity (that is, the amount produced per worker) started to drop.


Last year, University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe calculated that if Canada had simply stuck to its 2014-style growth rates, we’d all be making an extra $5,500 per year.

So, $250 covers about two weeks’ worth of the extra money you would have been making if the Canadian economy hadn’t detached from the U.S. and plunged into a decade of decline.

It buys about the same amount of gas!

Some good news! Gas prices, despite all the carbon pricing and fuel levies, are about the same now as in 2014. In the fall of 2014, the Canadian average for a litre of gasoline was hovering around $1.19 – about $1.53 in 2024 dollars.

IN OTHER NEWS


There’s been any number of outside polls showing that Canadian support for immigration has taken a sharp downturn in recent months. Just last month, the Environics Institute found that more than half of Canadians believe there’s too much immigration – a phenomenon they haven’t witnessed since the 1990s. Well, apparently similar numbers are also showing up in the government’s internal polling. The 2024 IRCC Online Tracking Survey, commissioned by the Department of Immigration, found that 47 per cent of Canadians think that too many immigrants are entering the country, that 42 per cent thought immigration was causing Canada to change in unlikeable ways, and 38 per cent agreed that “refugees pose a risk to the safety and security of Canadians.”

Every once in a while, the Conservatives will table a faint hope motion of non-confidence calling for the dissolution of the Trudeau government. Well, after the NDP backed a Liberal bill to enact a Christmas GST holiday, the Conservatives drew up the above text of a particularly nasty non-confidence motion they’re apparently going to table next. PHOTO BY X.COM/PIERREPOILIEVRE

Lest you think that all the various quips and insult in the House of Commons are merely performative, MPs are known to sometimes yell at each other even when the cameras are off. In a clandestinely filmed Friday video posted online by Conservative MP Michael Barrett, a contingent of NDPers can be seen standing over the Conservative benches to forcefully deliver a point of some kind, prompting Speaker of the House Greg Fergus to intervene to break it up.
 
Back
Top