Brad Sallows
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 8,291
- Points
- 1,040
Surely no political leader would do such a thing.
Trudeau Popularity - or not (various polling, etc.)
- Thread starter daftandbarmy
- Start date
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 14,702
- Points
- 1,140
Didn’t he mention an Inquisition? Or maybe a guy named Maynard?
- Reaction score
- 5,424
- Points
- 1,260
Part 1 of 2
Marieke Walsh and Robert Fife, writing in the Globe and Mail, say that Justin Trudeau is staying on:
----------
MARIEKE WALSH SENIOR POLITICAL REPORTER
ROBERT FIFE OTTAWA BUREAU CHIEF
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been told he can’t win the next election and should quit before he’s defeated.
Several MPs and former cabinet ministers have publicly called for his exit, including veteran Quebec Liberal MP Alexandra Mendès at this week’s caucus retreat in Nanaimo, B.C.
Privately, prominent party heavyweights, elder statesmen, fundraisers and campaign strategists have all urged Mr. Trudeau to leave.
Two sources say that Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, was one of those who told Mr. Trudeau in a July conversation that he can’t win the next election.
A former Liberal cabinet minister said that when he bluntly gave the Prime Minister the same message, he didn’t blink an eye.
“I can’t wait to take on Poilievre,” was Mr. Trudeau’s reply.
Despite a rocky summer that began with the loss of a long-held Toronto riding and ended with the resignation of his national campaign director, Mr. Trudeau remains defiant and determined to run again. He is unswayed by public-opinion polls that show Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre cementing a double-digit advantage. He intends to fight even if the Liberals lose another stronghold in Montreal in Monday’s by-election.
With at most one year left for Mr. Trudeau to turn things around before the next election, The Globe and Mail spoke with 22 Liberals, including five cabinet ministers, senior political staff, former cabinet ministers, current and former Liberal MPs and veteran campaign strategists. They paint a portrait of a Prime Minister who believes he performs best as an underdog and is convinced he can claw his way back into contention.
The Globe is not naming the sources so they could speak freely without fear of repercussion from the Prime Minister’s Office.
Mr. Trudeau’s determination and his team’s belief it can reverse course on more than a year of negative indicators require a stubborn optimism. Despite being widely counted out by political watchers both inside and outside the Liberal tent, Mr. Trudeau’s senior team of staff and ministerial allies say he can win a fourth mandate.
If Mr. Trudeau is successful, it would be “the most incredible comeback story in Canadian political history,” historian J.D.M. Stewart said.
The optimism of Mr. Trudeau’s inner circle shows a growing disconnect between Liberals in the Ottawa bubble (and those still closely working with them) and the party stalwarts scattered across the country who believe the best thing Mr. Trudeau can do for the Liberal Party is leave.
Those closest to the Prime Minister are adamant that will not happen. Ministers, MPs and senior staff say Mr. Trudeau strongly believes in his decision to stay and has privately sought to convince them of his resolve, even telling some of them the decision has already come at the cost of his marriage to Sophie Grégoire Trudeau.
However, even as they are convinced he will stay, some senior Liberals believe that decision could still change and ministerial leadership hopefuls Dominic LeBlanc, François-Philippe Champagne, Mélanie Joly and Anita Anand have been quietly organizing just in case. Also laying their groundwork are former central banker Mr. Carney and former B.C. premier Christy Clark, who spent some of the summerpractising her French. Senior Liberals say Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland may also be keen for the leader’s post.
The reason Mr. Trudeau is staying put comes down to three broad points, according to ministers and the staff working closest to him. First, he believes Mr. Poilievre’s values and vision for Canada are diametrically opposed to his own and represent a threat to the country’s social fabric. Second, the Prime Minister and his senior team believe they are clear-eyed about just how bad things are for them but believe they can recover. As well, Mr. Trudeau and his team have faced the precipice of loss before and have always managed to come out on top, so they believe they can do it again.
“We’re not delusional,” said one minister, who added that the message to Liberal MPs at the caucus meeting held this week was: “We know how hard this will be, it’s time to fight.”
The minister warned, however, that this time around, MPs who are used to winning on the Prime Minister’s coattails will have to put more work in.
A comeback, his staff, strategists and ministers say, will take place if they are able to reverse what they believe is still a soft anti-Trudeau sentiment among past Liberal voters; humanize the Prime Minister by ditching his talking points; amplify what they believe is a mean side to Mr. Poilievre; and, most importantly, find a message to pitch to voters about why Mr. Trudeau deserves a fourth term.
Above all, three ministers said, they need to quickly figure out what that message is.
Mr. Trudeau’s team is convinced that Canadians want a reason to vote for him. Some ministers and MPs say that what they hear on the doorsteps is that past Liberal voters need a reason to root for Mr. Trudeau, but without it plan to stay home in the next election.
One senior Liberal and experienced campaign strategist said that the Liberals will have to resort to a “dirty and vicious” campaign to beat the Conservatives.
Liberals also widely acknowledge their attempts to date – from last year’s cabinet shuffle to the fall affordability policy-push and the spring budget rollout – haven’t worked. Hopes of incrementally narrowing the polling gap five points at a time have evaporated, with Mr. Trudeau’s allies now saying the polls will only narrow closer to the election.
However, many believe that’s in part because most voters don’t know what the government has actually done. For more than a year now, ministers and MPs have asked the Prime Minister’s Office for ads to define Mr. Poilievre and separate ones to ensure voters know what the government is doing for them. MPs left the caucus this week believing such ads were finally in the offing.
“We’re absolutely not terminal,” said Ontario MP Marcus Powlowski, leaning on his past life as a doctor to make the case that just like cancer, the Liberals’ political dilemma can be treated.
Mr. Champagne, the Innovation Minister, argued that Mr. Trudeau has already proved he can make the impossible possible with his 2015 win, when the Liberals leapfrogged from third to first.
“It’s never easy, but it’s worth fighting for, because we’re fighting for Canada,” he said.
There is no historical precedent for what the Prime Minister is trying to accomplish, said Mr. Stewart, the historian. While two prime ministers have won four consecutive mandates – Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir Wilfrid Laurier – they both did so while they were still very popular.
The author of the forthcoming book, The Prime Ministers, a study of Macdonald to Canada’s modern-day leaders, said the challenge facing Mr. Trudeau is “monumental, historic, unprecedented in the last 100-plus years of Canadian history.”
“No one’s ever won a fourth mandate after coming back from the jaws of defeat, Laurier was always leading the way, Macdonald was always leading the way. So no one’s ever done this.”
Political triumphs in other jurisdictions are keeping the hope alive for Mr. Trudeau’s team, but none quite hold up. Several Liberals pointed to Kamala Harris’s success selling a positive message as proof Mr. Trudeau can do the same, but denied the need for the first step in that story: change at the top.
Others pointed to the political comebacks of premiers such as Kathleen Wynne and Ms. Clark. Both were counted out at the start of their election campaigns only to score major upsets. But both did so in their first general election, not their fourth.
One cabinet minister said the Prime Minister believes he’s an underdog and his mentality right now is that he’s in the boxing ring and can win. But the minister said that perspective ignores the fact that Mr. Trudeau is an incumbent and a well-known commodity with the Canadian electorate.
The minister and other Liberals said the Toronto-St. Paul’s by-election loss has now been internally played down as a hyper-local event driven by the Liberals’ approach to the Israel-Hamas war and the capital-gains tax hike.
End of Part 1
Marieke Walsh and Robert Fife, writing in the Globe and Mail, say that Justin Trudeau is staying on:
----------
Defiant and unbowed: Why Justin Trudeau isn’t going anywhere
With at most one year left for the Prime Minister to turn things around, The Globe spoke with 22 senior Liberals who paint a portrait of a leader who believes he can claw his way back to contentionMARIEKE WALSH SENIOR POLITICAL REPORTER
ROBERT FIFE OTTAWA BUREAU CHIEF
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been told he can’t win the next election and should quit before he’s defeated.
Several MPs and former cabinet ministers have publicly called for his exit, including veteran Quebec Liberal MP Alexandra Mendès at this week’s caucus retreat in Nanaimo, B.C.
Privately, prominent party heavyweights, elder statesmen, fundraisers and campaign strategists have all urged Mr. Trudeau to leave.
Two sources say that Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, was one of those who told Mr. Trudeau in a July conversation that he can’t win the next election.
A former Liberal cabinet minister said that when he bluntly gave the Prime Minister the same message, he didn’t blink an eye.
“I can’t wait to take on Poilievre,” was Mr. Trudeau’s reply.
Despite a rocky summer that began with the loss of a long-held Toronto riding and ended with the resignation of his national campaign director, Mr. Trudeau remains defiant and determined to run again. He is unswayed by public-opinion polls that show Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre cementing a double-digit advantage. He intends to fight even if the Liberals lose another stronghold in Montreal in Monday’s by-election.
With at most one year left for Mr. Trudeau to turn things around before the next election, The Globe and Mail spoke with 22 Liberals, including five cabinet ministers, senior political staff, former cabinet ministers, current and former Liberal MPs and veteran campaign strategists. They paint a portrait of a Prime Minister who believes he performs best as an underdog and is convinced he can claw his way back into contention.
The Globe is not naming the sources so they could speak freely without fear of repercussion from the Prime Minister’s Office.
Mr. Trudeau’s determination and his team’s belief it can reverse course on more than a year of negative indicators require a stubborn optimism. Despite being widely counted out by political watchers both inside and outside the Liberal tent, Mr. Trudeau’s senior team of staff and ministerial allies say he can win a fourth mandate.
If Mr. Trudeau is successful, it would be “the most incredible comeback story in Canadian political history,” historian J.D.M. Stewart said.
The optimism of Mr. Trudeau’s inner circle shows a growing disconnect between Liberals in the Ottawa bubble (and those still closely working with them) and the party stalwarts scattered across the country who believe the best thing Mr. Trudeau can do for the Liberal Party is leave.
Those closest to the Prime Minister are adamant that will not happen. Ministers, MPs and senior staff say Mr. Trudeau strongly believes in his decision to stay and has privately sought to convince them of his resolve, even telling some of them the decision has already come at the cost of his marriage to Sophie Grégoire Trudeau.
However, even as they are convinced he will stay, some senior Liberals believe that decision could still change and ministerial leadership hopefuls Dominic LeBlanc, François-Philippe Champagne, Mélanie Joly and Anita Anand have been quietly organizing just in case. Also laying their groundwork are former central banker Mr. Carney and former B.C. premier Christy Clark, who spent some of the summerpractising her French. Senior Liberals say Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland may also be keen for the leader’s post.
The reason Mr. Trudeau is staying put comes down to three broad points, according to ministers and the staff working closest to him. First, he believes Mr. Poilievre’s values and vision for Canada are diametrically opposed to his own and represent a threat to the country’s social fabric. Second, the Prime Minister and his senior team believe they are clear-eyed about just how bad things are for them but believe they can recover. As well, Mr. Trudeau and his team have faced the precipice of loss before and have always managed to come out on top, so they believe they can do it again.
“We’re not delusional,” said one minister, who added that the message to Liberal MPs at the caucus meeting held this week was: “We know how hard this will be, it’s time to fight.”
The minister warned, however, that this time around, MPs who are used to winning on the Prime Minister’s coattails will have to put more work in.
A comeback, his staff, strategists and ministers say, will take place if they are able to reverse what they believe is still a soft anti-Trudeau sentiment among past Liberal voters; humanize the Prime Minister by ditching his talking points; amplify what they believe is a mean side to Mr. Poilievre; and, most importantly, find a message to pitch to voters about why Mr. Trudeau deserves a fourth term.
Above all, three ministers said, they need to quickly figure out what that message is.
Mr. Trudeau’s team is convinced that Canadians want a reason to vote for him. Some ministers and MPs say that what they hear on the doorsteps is that past Liberal voters need a reason to root for Mr. Trudeau, but without it plan to stay home in the next election.
One senior Liberal and experienced campaign strategist said that the Liberals will have to resort to a “dirty and vicious” campaign to beat the Conservatives.
Liberals also widely acknowledge their attempts to date – from last year’s cabinet shuffle to the fall affordability policy-push and the spring budget rollout – haven’t worked. Hopes of incrementally narrowing the polling gap five points at a time have evaporated, with Mr. Trudeau’s allies now saying the polls will only narrow closer to the election.
However, many believe that’s in part because most voters don’t know what the government has actually done. For more than a year now, ministers and MPs have asked the Prime Minister’s Office for ads to define Mr. Poilievre and separate ones to ensure voters know what the government is doing for them. MPs left the caucus this week believing such ads were finally in the offing.
“We’re absolutely not terminal,” said Ontario MP Marcus Powlowski, leaning on his past life as a doctor to make the case that just like cancer, the Liberals’ political dilemma can be treated.
Mr. Champagne, the Innovation Minister, argued that Mr. Trudeau has already proved he can make the impossible possible with his 2015 win, when the Liberals leapfrogged from third to first.
“It’s never easy, but it’s worth fighting for, because we’re fighting for Canada,” he said.
There is no historical precedent for what the Prime Minister is trying to accomplish, said Mr. Stewart, the historian. While two prime ministers have won four consecutive mandates – Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir Wilfrid Laurier – they both did so while they were still very popular.
The author of the forthcoming book, The Prime Ministers, a study of Macdonald to Canada’s modern-day leaders, said the challenge facing Mr. Trudeau is “monumental, historic, unprecedented in the last 100-plus years of Canadian history.”
“No one’s ever won a fourth mandate after coming back from the jaws of defeat, Laurier was always leading the way, Macdonald was always leading the way. So no one’s ever done this.”
Political triumphs in other jurisdictions are keeping the hope alive for Mr. Trudeau’s team, but none quite hold up. Several Liberals pointed to Kamala Harris’s success selling a positive message as proof Mr. Trudeau can do the same, but denied the need for the first step in that story: change at the top.
Others pointed to the political comebacks of premiers such as Kathleen Wynne and Ms. Clark. Both were counted out at the start of their election campaigns only to score major upsets. But both did so in their first general election, not their fourth.
One cabinet minister said the Prime Minister believes he’s an underdog and his mentality right now is that he’s in the boxing ring and can win. But the minister said that perspective ignores the fact that Mr. Trudeau is an incumbent and a well-known commodity with the Canadian electorate.
The minister and other Liberals said the Toronto-St. Paul’s by-election loss has now been internally played down as a hyper-local event driven by the Liberals’ approach to the Israel-Hamas war and the capital-gains tax hike.
End of Part 1
- Reaction score
- 5,424
- Points
- 1,260
Part 2 of 2
That’s in part why several say the Montreal by-election result on Monday will be so important. Another bad result can’t be discounted in the same way, with one former minister describing it as a referendum on Mr. Trudeau. Another minister said they expect the party will be on track to lose two-thirds of their seats in the next general election if they can’t hold LaSalle-Émard-Verdun.
Publicly, Liberal ministers and MPs are staying upbeat, but some in Mr. Trudeau’s entourage are privately chafing at the litany of negative stories they’ve endured. Senior staff and MPs tell The Globe they believe the national press hasn’t done enough to scrutinize Mr. Poilievre.
Behind closed doors during this week’s caucus retreat in Nanaimo, B.C., Mr. Trudeau’s chief of staff Katie Telford urged MPs to stop speaking to journalists, including The Globe, according to two people in the room.
Pollster Nik Nanos, founder of Nanos Research, said Mr. Trudeau’s brain trust is trying to put on a brave face to manage the nervous nellies in the Liberal caucus.
“Until the day Trudeau steps down they must say that he can turn it around and can win, even if they don’t believe it. When you are trailing your opponent by double-digits and there is no political coattails, that is the only way to control or manage caucus,” Mr. Nanos said.
Mr. Trudeau’s situation is not unlike what befell Brian Mulroney in 1993. He hung on too long despite polls showing that more Canadians believed Elvis was alive than supported his continued leadership of the Progressive Conservatives.
Mr. Mulroney was certain he could defeat Jean Chrétien’s Liberals. He waited until it was too late. He left his successor, Kim Campbell, with only a few months to turn things around. The Progressive Conservatives were reduced to two seats in the next election. Mr. Chrétien went on to win three majority governments before he was forced out in an internal party fight with Paul Martin.
Nobody expects a repeat of what happened to Mr. Chrétien. But one former minister expects to see at least some MPs and cabinet ministers leave in the coming months. Another Liberal stalwart estimated between 30 and 40 MPs may not seek re-election if Mr. Trudeau stays at the top.
The Prime Minister’s Quebec lieutenant and Transportation Minister, Pablo Rodriguez, has already decided to leave, said one minister who characterized his departure to run for the Quebec Liberals as a question of when not if. With Mr. Trudeau determined to hang in, a former minister said he would not be surprised if one or two of the cabinet leadership aspirants pack it in.
Already, Jeremy Broadhurst, the former top Trudeau adviser who helped run the last two campaigns, has called it quits. Mr. Broadhurst announced his resignation as national campaign director last week, just days before Mr. Trudeau met with his caucus.
As The Globe reported Monday, there’s also been an exodus of senior staff just as the minority Liberals are returning to a precarious position in the House of Commons, having lost the automatic support of the New Democratic Party.
Five of his 38 ministers are losing their chiefs of staff in quick succession, with several already gone, including top advisers at Global Affairs, Heritage, Environment, National Revenue and Mental Health and Addictions. More are expected to leave.
“There is a sense that the Trudeau government has run its course and that defeat in the next election is a guarantee. The departure of senior staff suggests that even those who are part of Team Trudeau can see the writing on the wall,” said Lori Turnbull, chair of the Dalhousie University public and international affairs department.
Liberal insiders say Mr. Trudeau sees himself as the comeback kid, a fighter who can beat the odds. He seems incapable, say those who know him, of accepting any responsibility for the widespread dissatisfaction with his government.
At a late August cabinet retreat, two sources said Mr. Trudeau criticized cabinet for the party’s low standing and urged them to be more effective in pumping up the spirits of his demoralized caucus.
At the closed-door caucus meeting in Nanaimo this week, three MPs said the tone was different than they have experienced in the past. The MPs said they didn’t endure the type of scolding from Ms. Telford that they got at last year’s meeting in London when they questioned the Prime Minister’s winnability. In advance of the Nanaimo meeting, Mr. Trudeau spent time at regional caucuses, listening to their concerns. And he and Ms. Freeland also spoke to dozens of MPs in one-on-one sessions at caucus meeting.
In July, The Globe reported that senior PMO officials, including Ms. Telford, were criticizing Ms. Freeland’s communications skills as a reason for the government’s inability to reconnect with Canadians. They blamed Ms. Freeland for failing to effectively sell the government’s economic policies that have come under assault from Mr. Poilievre.
Liberal insiders say Mr. Trudeau, his staff and Ms. Freeland equally share the blame for hiking capital-gains taxes in the budget that caused a backlash among entrepreneurs, doctors and cottage owners. Raising taxes of any kind when they are facing a Conservative opponent who is promising cuts made little political sense, they say. And the government has made things worse by mishandling immigration: opening the door to millions of temporary residents without proper consideration about how that would impact housing affordability.
In what must have been a humiliating blow to Ms. Freeland, the Prime Minister acknowledged in July that he tried to recruit Mr. Carney to his government.
While Mr. Carney is interested in running for the Liberal leadership should Mr. Trudeau step down, those close to him say he has no desire to join a deeply unpopular government heading for defeat.
However, Mr. Carney did go along with Mr. Trudeau’s urgings to head an economic task force to generate new ideas to turbocharge the economy and tackle the country’s low productivity. But outsourcing the job of setting the country’s business agenda to Mr. Carney signals a lack of confidence in Ms. Freeland and Mr. Champagne, the second-most important economic minister, who has won praise for bringing EV vehicle plants to Canada.
“Bringing in Mark Carney basically says there is no one on the bench for him that he has confidence in,” Mr. Nanos said. “Bringing in Mark Carney also suggests that the Prime Minister can turn this around by himself. For Justin Trudeau there is no real downside except from the perspective of managing his cabinet ministers, who will effectively take a second-row seat to Mark Carney as the new favourite of the Prime Minister.”
Two ministers characterized the role as a soft launch for the former central banker. No matter what, one said, this election will be Mr. Trudeau’s last and they view Mr. Carney’s new role as his chance to show his political chops and take the first step to getting him on the ballot as a candidate in the next campaign.
The other minister characterized it as Mr. Carney’s opening to prove his mettle to Liberals.
Perrin Beatty, the recently departed president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, wouldn’t comment on Liberal Party intrigues. But he welcomed Mr. Carney’s new role as the Prime Minister’s top economic adviser.
“It’s good that the Prime Minister has started to listen to advice from outside. The challenge has been to get the government’s attention, making them realize that there are serious problems that are affecting Canadians that need to be addressed,” Mr. Beatty said.
“My experience over the course of the last while has been that the government has seemed unaware of how seriously businesses and individual Canadians are being affected by the state of the economy.”
It’s not clear though that Mr. Trudeau – even with Mr. Carney on board – has the credibility on economic issues to make his case to voters.
While inflation, which surged to a 40-year high in 2022, is mostly back to normal and interest rates are coming down, housing affordability remains near an all-time low. Many homeowners are still looking at sizable jumps in their monthly payments when their mortgages reset. The size of the public service has ballooned and Mr. Trudeau has overseen a significant decline in Canadian productivity despite countless policies aimed at boosting business investment and innovation.
“My sense is there’s probably a fatigue from lots of promises and then not seeing immediate results,” said Rebekah Young, vice-president and head of inclusion and resilience economics at Bank of Nova Scotia.
“There’s certainly been no growth agenda, and, if anything, a kind of an anti-growth agenda, both in terms of signalling and policies. So I think that part of the challenge is coming up with this compelling kind of growth agenda, where Canadians see their own welfare in that agenda.”
A former senior campaign strategist said the outreach to Mr. Carney suggests a change in policy and not a change in leadership. The strategist said he didn’t pull any punches in a recent discussion with Mr. Trudeau, telling him the mood in the country is for change and Canadians are fatigued with his leadership and have lost faith in his government. While he doesn’t believe Mr. Trudeau can win the next election, his advice to the Prime Minister is to embrace radical change if he decides to stay.
The strategist said Mr. Trudeau must make dramatic changes on economic policy and stop talking about climate change and diversity issues. He advised the Prime Minister to pledge to tear down interprovincial barriers, get rid of supply management and bring in foreign competition in the telecom sector. These are radical ideas that would put Mr. Poilievre in a challenging situation, the senior Liberal said.
But the strategist added that he went away without any idea of what Mr. Trudeau plans to do other than this “sort of macho, combative spirit: I am not going to lose to Poilievre.”
Very interesting, as someone used to say ...
That’s in part why several say the Montreal by-election result on Monday will be so important. Another bad result can’t be discounted in the same way, with one former minister describing it as a referendum on Mr. Trudeau. Another minister said they expect the party will be on track to lose two-thirds of their seats in the next general election if they can’t hold LaSalle-Émard-Verdun.
Publicly, Liberal ministers and MPs are staying upbeat, but some in Mr. Trudeau’s entourage are privately chafing at the litany of negative stories they’ve endured. Senior staff and MPs tell The Globe they believe the national press hasn’t done enough to scrutinize Mr. Poilievre.
Behind closed doors during this week’s caucus retreat in Nanaimo, B.C., Mr. Trudeau’s chief of staff Katie Telford urged MPs to stop speaking to journalists, including The Globe, according to two people in the room.
Pollster Nik Nanos, founder of Nanos Research, said Mr. Trudeau’s brain trust is trying to put on a brave face to manage the nervous nellies in the Liberal caucus.
“Until the day Trudeau steps down they must say that he can turn it around and can win, even if they don’t believe it. When you are trailing your opponent by double-digits and there is no political coattails, that is the only way to control or manage caucus,” Mr. Nanos said.
Mr. Trudeau’s situation is not unlike what befell Brian Mulroney in 1993. He hung on too long despite polls showing that more Canadians believed Elvis was alive than supported his continued leadership of the Progressive Conservatives.
Mr. Mulroney was certain he could defeat Jean Chrétien’s Liberals. He waited until it was too late. He left his successor, Kim Campbell, with only a few months to turn things around. The Progressive Conservatives were reduced to two seats in the next election. Mr. Chrétien went on to win three majority governments before he was forced out in an internal party fight with Paul Martin.
Nobody expects a repeat of what happened to Mr. Chrétien. But one former minister expects to see at least some MPs and cabinet ministers leave in the coming months. Another Liberal stalwart estimated between 30 and 40 MPs may not seek re-election if Mr. Trudeau stays at the top.
The Prime Minister’s Quebec lieutenant and Transportation Minister, Pablo Rodriguez, has already decided to leave, said one minister who characterized his departure to run for the Quebec Liberals as a question of when not if. With Mr. Trudeau determined to hang in, a former minister said he would not be surprised if one or two of the cabinet leadership aspirants pack it in.
Already, Jeremy Broadhurst, the former top Trudeau adviser who helped run the last two campaigns, has called it quits. Mr. Broadhurst announced his resignation as national campaign director last week, just days before Mr. Trudeau met with his caucus.
As The Globe reported Monday, there’s also been an exodus of senior staff just as the minority Liberals are returning to a precarious position in the House of Commons, having lost the automatic support of the New Democratic Party.
Five of his 38 ministers are losing their chiefs of staff in quick succession, with several already gone, including top advisers at Global Affairs, Heritage, Environment, National Revenue and Mental Health and Addictions. More are expected to leave.
“There is a sense that the Trudeau government has run its course and that defeat in the next election is a guarantee. The departure of senior staff suggests that even those who are part of Team Trudeau can see the writing on the wall,” said Lori Turnbull, chair of the Dalhousie University public and international affairs department.
Liberal insiders say Mr. Trudeau sees himself as the comeback kid, a fighter who can beat the odds. He seems incapable, say those who know him, of accepting any responsibility for the widespread dissatisfaction with his government.
At a late August cabinet retreat, two sources said Mr. Trudeau criticized cabinet for the party’s low standing and urged them to be more effective in pumping up the spirits of his demoralized caucus.
At the closed-door caucus meeting in Nanaimo this week, three MPs said the tone was different than they have experienced in the past. The MPs said they didn’t endure the type of scolding from Ms. Telford that they got at last year’s meeting in London when they questioned the Prime Minister’s winnability. In advance of the Nanaimo meeting, Mr. Trudeau spent time at regional caucuses, listening to their concerns. And he and Ms. Freeland also spoke to dozens of MPs in one-on-one sessions at caucus meeting.
In July, The Globe reported that senior PMO officials, including Ms. Telford, were criticizing Ms. Freeland’s communications skills as a reason for the government’s inability to reconnect with Canadians. They blamed Ms. Freeland for failing to effectively sell the government’s economic policies that have come under assault from Mr. Poilievre.
Liberal insiders say Mr. Trudeau, his staff and Ms. Freeland equally share the blame for hiking capital-gains taxes in the budget that caused a backlash among entrepreneurs, doctors and cottage owners. Raising taxes of any kind when they are facing a Conservative opponent who is promising cuts made little political sense, they say. And the government has made things worse by mishandling immigration: opening the door to millions of temporary residents without proper consideration about how that would impact housing affordability.
In what must have been a humiliating blow to Ms. Freeland, the Prime Minister acknowledged in July that he tried to recruit Mr. Carney to his government.
While Mr. Carney is interested in running for the Liberal leadership should Mr. Trudeau step down, those close to him say he has no desire to join a deeply unpopular government heading for defeat.
However, Mr. Carney did go along with Mr. Trudeau’s urgings to head an economic task force to generate new ideas to turbocharge the economy and tackle the country’s low productivity. But outsourcing the job of setting the country’s business agenda to Mr. Carney signals a lack of confidence in Ms. Freeland and Mr. Champagne, the second-most important economic minister, who has won praise for bringing EV vehicle plants to Canada.
“Bringing in Mark Carney basically says there is no one on the bench for him that he has confidence in,” Mr. Nanos said. “Bringing in Mark Carney also suggests that the Prime Minister can turn this around by himself. For Justin Trudeau there is no real downside except from the perspective of managing his cabinet ministers, who will effectively take a second-row seat to Mark Carney as the new favourite of the Prime Minister.”
Two ministers characterized the role as a soft launch for the former central banker. No matter what, one said, this election will be Mr. Trudeau’s last and they view Mr. Carney’s new role as his chance to show his political chops and take the first step to getting him on the ballot as a candidate in the next campaign.
The other minister characterized it as Mr. Carney’s opening to prove his mettle to Liberals.
Perrin Beatty, the recently departed president of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, wouldn’t comment on Liberal Party intrigues. But he welcomed Mr. Carney’s new role as the Prime Minister’s top economic adviser.
“It’s good that the Prime Minister has started to listen to advice from outside. The challenge has been to get the government’s attention, making them realize that there are serious problems that are affecting Canadians that need to be addressed,” Mr. Beatty said.
“My experience over the course of the last while has been that the government has seemed unaware of how seriously businesses and individual Canadians are being affected by the state of the economy.”
It’s not clear though that Mr. Trudeau – even with Mr. Carney on board – has the credibility on economic issues to make his case to voters.
While inflation, which surged to a 40-year high in 2022, is mostly back to normal and interest rates are coming down, housing affordability remains near an all-time low. Many homeowners are still looking at sizable jumps in their monthly payments when their mortgages reset. The size of the public service has ballooned and Mr. Trudeau has overseen a significant decline in Canadian productivity despite countless policies aimed at boosting business investment and innovation.
“My sense is there’s probably a fatigue from lots of promises and then not seeing immediate results,” said Rebekah Young, vice-president and head of inclusion and resilience economics at Bank of Nova Scotia.
“There’s certainly been no growth agenda, and, if anything, a kind of an anti-growth agenda, both in terms of signalling and policies. So I think that part of the challenge is coming up with this compelling kind of growth agenda, where Canadians see their own welfare in that agenda.”
A former senior campaign strategist said the outreach to Mr. Carney suggests a change in policy and not a change in leadership. The strategist said he didn’t pull any punches in a recent discussion with Mr. Trudeau, telling him the mood in the country is for change and Canadians are fatigued with his leadership and have lost faith in his government. While he doesn’t believe Mr. Trudeau can win the next election, his advice to the Prime Minister is to embrace radical change if he decides to stay.
The strategist said Mr. Trudeau must make dramatic changes on economic policy and stop talking about climate change and diversity issues. He advised the Prime Minister to pledge to tear down interprovincial barriers, get rid of supply management and bring in foreign competition in the telecom sector. These are radical ideas that would put Mr. Poilievre in a challenging situation, the senior Liberal said.
But the strategist added that he went away without any idea of what Mr. Trudeau plans to do other than this “sort of macho, combative spirit: I am not going to lose to Poilievre.”
----------
Very interesting, as someone used to say ...
Attachments
- Reaction score
- 21,063
- Points
- 1,360
What a ridiculously inept point to try and make on the part of Champagne!
What was so “impossible” for the son of PET to win against ‘Evil Harper’ after the country was firmly into ‘vote the guy out after ten years’ territory?
- Reaction score
- 5,674
- Points
- 1,060
Perhaps trudeau wants to run and win again so Canada doesn't get a look at the books. 
This is what happens when a leader is more intent on salvaging his own personal legacy than they are about solving the country's problems.
This is what happens when a leader is more intent on salvaging his own personal legacy than they are about solving the country's problems.
ArmyRick
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,178
- Points
- 1,010
Mmmmmm
My thoughts
My thoughts
Maybe he should start to listening to someone, anyone for a change
Then start by taking him on head to head in question period instead of passing it onto another of your team, not showing up or failing to address what he was challenged on. Or call an election and you can go head to head in the most important time it really matters.
I think many Canadians disagree
More indicators that this whole party has become a cult of personality
Really? A little late in the game now. Face it Trudeau Liberals, you have no more aces in the hole
That is the problem with Trudeau. He is treating this about himself and his own ego. That attitude is great to have when actually in a boxing match or on a very long ruck march but this situation is different. This situation of Trudeau staying on and trying even harder is more akin to a surgeon who has long killed the patient they are operating on and just making a bigger mess. There is a time to quit and put your ego on the back burner, Mr Trudeau
- Reaction score
- 21,063
- Points
- 1,360
Trudeau without question will hang around until after he hosts G7 in Kananaskis next summer. His ego won’t allow him to give up the ‘Cool Host of the Cool Kids’ opportunity…I bet you he doesn’t call the election until the last day of the G7, where he can announce the election and smear some ‘look what I achieved with our G7 friends’ icing on top his announcement.
When life/politics/influence is normally at place, “follow the money” isn’t a bad mantra.
With Trudeau, it’s “follow his ego.”
When life/politics/influence is normally at place, “follow the money” isn’t a bad mantra.
With Trudeau, it’s “follow his ego.”
RangerRay
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,549
- Points
- 1,260
Trudeau has a messiah complex. He firmly believes the Poillievre will destroy the country and only he can save us. These kind of people are very dangerous because they can believe the ends justify the means and will say and do anything, including tear their society apart, if it means winning.
“Either we win the election or we won’t have a country anymore”. Where have we heard that before?
“Either we win the election or we won’t have a country anymore”. Where have we heard that before?
ArmyRick
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,178
- Points
- 1,010
Fully agreed. Interesting, I never felt that Jean Chretien or Paul Martin had the same mind set.
- Reaction score
- 1,496
- Points
- 1,060
not looking good for the Liberals, might as well hang on as long as possible as it cant get much worse
but a significant shift for the NDP. No change in percentage but up 18 due to voter distribution, I guess. Too bad the Bloc will keep them from taking advantage of it now.
- Reaction score
- 21,063
- Points
- 1,360
Remember, the LaSalle—Émard—Verdun by-election is all about Palestini, not Trudeau…
globalnews.ca
Liberal candidate in Montreal byelection says campaign is not about Trudeau | Globalnews.ca
LaSalle—Émard—Verdun has been a Liberal bastion, by and large, for decades. But this time, it’s hard to predict what will happen when polls close on Monday.
globalnews.ca
Halifax Tar
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 10,759
- Points
- 1,260
Thats beautiful.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 30,591
- Points
- 1,160
Let's see how much better looking it gets by the end of the day tomorrow
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 30,591
- Points
- 1,160
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 14,702
- Points
- 1,140
I take it that it did not go well for JT
