OAS should be heavily means tested, improved for those who need it, and slashed for those who don’t. Those of us with defined benefit pensions that aren’t coordinated with OAS likely have no need of it. It should exist to keep seniors out of poverty; not to add an additional unearned boost to the retirement incomes of relatively wealthy pensioners.HIJACK
The OAS at 68.3Billion and rising. 6-10B going to the wealthy annually. That's literally 100x higher than the sum of ArriveCan and gun buyback scandals every single year, AND RISING. Hell including the 40m MetoWe stood to be paid for that scandal is a rounding error.
Scandals are draw the eye and ire of the populace, and are excellent politically because they can be universally panned. But real fiscal responsibility comes with hard discussions. The decision to reverse the raise from 65 to 67 and to put a non-mean tested 10% boost to OAS over 75 are far more impactful on our bottom line than all the scandals and snafu's combined.