- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 60
I can only speak on this as a minor, now I have personal experience in 40 year old guys having sex with 12 year old girls (my cousin) and I am obviously against it, BUT I have some problems with the 5 year clause, I agree with an age clause but I think 5 years is a little long.
I feel I can say this becuase I have been in a relationship with a girl who's yongest daughter is older than me. I was not readt for that. I figured sweet, I am the biggest mack of them all(how wrong I was). So I was stuck in a relationship I didnt really want anymore, becuase I thought i was cool. Now I know that she was way over the 5 years anyway, but this could happend with a 14 and 19 year old(minus the kid). If she is 14, he is supposedly gonna have more expeirience and have the "cool" factor lorded over her. I think it should be a 3 year clause. Giving young girls, and potentioally guys, the chance to mature and get ready for a sexual relationship with some one closer to their age.
I feel I can say this becuase I have been in a relationship with a girl who's yongest daughter is older than me. I was not readt for that. I figured sweet, I am the biggest mack of them all(how wrong I was). So I was stuck in a relationship I didnt really want anymore, becuase I thought i was cool. Now I know that she was way over the 5 years anyway, but this could happend with a 14 and 19 year old(minus the kid). If she is 14, he is supposedly gonna have more expeirience and have the "cool" factor lorded over her. I think it should be a 3 year clause. Giving young girls, and potentioally guys, the chance to mature and get ready for a sexual relationship with some one closer to their age.