- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 230
mariomike said:I guess it brings us back to this discussion,
Media Bias [Merged]
https://army.ca/forums/threads/18397.1325
56 pages.
Thanks mariomike
mariomike said:I guess it brings us back to this discussion,
Media Bias [Merged]
https://army.ca/forums/threads/18397.1325
56 pages.
Thucydides said:After reading this, I was frankly astonished anyone thought it was a good idea to nominate Kamala Harris as VP:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-built-her-career-on-injustice
And given her poor performance in the Primaries and at the "debates" (Tulsi Gabbard pretty much sliced and diced her), I don't see what she actually brings to the table except "woman of colour".
We will see, however.....
Thucydides said:(Tulsi Gabbard pretty much sliced and diced her),
Thucydides said:After reading this, I was frankly astonished anyone thought it was a good idea to nominate Kamala Harris as VP:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-built-her-career-on-injustice
And given her poor performance in the Primaries and at the "debates" (Tulsi Gabbard pretty much sliced and diced her), I don't see what she actually brings to the table except "woman of colour".
We will see, however.....
Thucydides said:After reading this, I was frankly astonished anyone thought it was a good idea to nominate Kamala Harris as VP:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/kamala-harris-built-her-career-on-injustice
And given her poor performance in the Primaries and at the "debates" (Tulsi Gabbard pretty much sliced and diced her), I don't see what she actually brings to the table except "woman of colour".
We will see, however.....
Hannah Cox (@HannahCox7) is a libertarian-conservative activist and a contributor to the Washington Examiner’s Beltway Confidential blog.
Hamish Seggie said:I know virtually nothing about her
FJAG said:This is the way the writer of that piece describes herself in her byline:
It strikes me that when you strip away the rhetoric (words like "prison-industrial complex" and "crooked cop"), Kamala Harris was a law and order DA etc.
I'd take what she says with a barrel of salt.
:cheers:
QV said:To get a taste of Kamala Harris all you really needed to do was watch Harris' performances during some of the hearings and during the Dem primaries. Which was terrible IMO.
Harris’s Approval Rating Soars After Trump Reminds Nation How “Nasty” She Was to Kavanaugh
https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/kamala-harriss-approval-rating-soars-after-trump-reminds-nation-how-nasty-she-was-to-kavanaugh
BeyondTheNow said:... He donated to Harris’s 2014 re-election as California AG, so if she is indeed what he says she is, clearly, at one point in time he was all for it.
QV said:During the Republican primaries in 2016, he was questioned about his political donations. He was quite candid in his response where he stated words to the effect that he knew how politics worked and he donated money to politicians so that when he made a phone call the politician on the other end answered it. It has nothing to do with supporting or not supporting, but rather getting things done.
QV said:During the Republican primaries in 2016, he was questioned about his political donations. He was quite candid in his response where he stated words to the effect that he knew how politics worked and he donated money to politicians so that when he made a phone call the politician on the other end answered it. It has nothing to do with supporting or not supporting, but rather getting things done.
BeyondTheNow said:And? You’ve given more credence to my prior statement.
QV said:No. Where you state "at one point in time he was all for it" I suggest is wrong. He did it to buy favours not show support.
QV said:No. Where you state "at one point in time he was all for it" I suggest is wrong. He did it to buy favours not show support.
Remius said:That certainly explains who he takes calls from.