KevinB said:2003-2004
I know that MJP's made it beyond 1 VP and beyond 1 CMBG.
MCG said:So, the CAF has decided to modify all bivy bags by cutting them open and putting a zipper in place.
I guess somebody complained that the current bags work for keeping water out.
MCG said:So, the CAF has decided to modify all bivy bags by cutting them open and putting a zipper in place.
I guess somebody complained that the current bags work for keeping water out.
MCG said:So, the CAF has decided to modify all bivy bags by cutting them open and putting a zipper in place.
I guess somebody complained that the current bags work for keeping water out.
MCG said:I guess somebody complained that the current bags work for keeping water out.
PuckChaser said:Or somebody wasn't slender enough to slide into one and bring their arms in over their head. We do have the FORCE test now, time to modify the kit for those unable to lift their arms above their head.
MilEME09 said:Does that mean armless combat tunics now? for greater range of movement? >PuckChaser said:Or somebody wasn't slender enough to slide into one and bring their arms in over their head. We do have the FORCE test now, time to modify the kit for those unable to lift their arms above their head.
MCG said:So, the CAF has decided to modify all bivy bags by cutting them open and putting a zipper in place.
I guess somebody complained that the current bags work for keeping water out.
Rheostatic said:The original bivvy bag presented a suffocation hazard to our younger members. It was determined that a warning label would diminish the visual effect of the CADPAT material. The preferred option was to recall the item and enhance it with an "egress, zip fastener, tactical".
I have seen it, but took no pictures. You can look it up in CGCS under the following NSNs:Bzzliteyr said:Can we get a confirmation on this? Email, photos??
The PM or LCMM (I am a few relays along in the telephone game) is pointing the finger back at the field force for this. Apparently it was an infantry focus group that made the recomendation.Hamish Seggie said:Too many good idea fairies.
MCG said:I have seen it, but took no pictures. You can look it up in CGCS under the following NSNs:
8465-20-007-2648
8465-20-007-2649
8465-20-007-2650
8465-20-007-2651
The PM or LCMM (I am a few relays along in the telephone game) is pointing the finger back at the field force for this. Apparently it was an infantry focus group that made the recomendation.