mariomike said:The veterans "burst out of their seats and attacked the demonstators."
Police made nine arrests.
I bet the arrested were the protesters
mariomike said:The veterans "burst out of their seats and attacked the demonstators."
Police made nine arrests.
:mover1 said:Remember to boycott McDonald's for not letting their employees wear poppies at work.
MJP said:Right like I want the people that prepare my food to wear something that can easily fall out. I think we have to apply a little bit of common sense before we get all indignant that some company doesn't allow their employees to do something.
mover1 said:Remember to boycott McDonald's for making us fat.
mover1 said:Remember to boycott McDonald's for making us fat.
pbi said:I live in the west end of Kingston and the poppy box was on display from the start at the Tim's on Collins' Bay Road. My guess is that the real issue isn't the sale of the poppies, but rather a company policy on people "soliciting" on the property, regardless of the cause.
But, this is Canada. Just wait...we are going to hear some whiny little organization say something like:
"...Well, if we can allow people to glorify war on Tim's property, then our group Save the Mentally Challenged Snails should have that right too..."
Cheers
ArmyVern said:I was under the impression that I (and my forefathers) fought for all Canadians, not just myself and my organization.
pbi said:My point was not about Tim's supporting poppy sales but about not allowing "soliciting". Tim's itself contributes to Canada and Canadians is a number of different ways, so I don't think it can be accused of limiting its support to the Legion.
As for whether or not the Legion should be given special consideration over all other social organizations: it asks the question of whether or not we should accord special and unique recognition to the idea of sacrifice for country, which is what is at the heart of the poppy campaign, over causes such as cancer, homelessness, or victims of drunk driving.
I say, yes, we should. But then, I also say that we should ony half-mast the national flag for those who die in the service of the nation, not for victims of crime, etc. etc.
Cheers
I wasn't accusing you of anything of the sort.
I was simply stating that I, as a Canadian, have the right to donate to whichever legitimate charitable cause I wish
If you want to play the "sacrifice for country card"
it goes without saying that supporting veterans groups and activities will always be the highest and only legitimate cause worthy of "anytime/anywhere" and to be "entitled to" special privledges over other groups no matter the policy of the Company at hand.
Sorry, but we'll have to agree to disagree on that; I believe we all have that right to seek donations for our cause and that I am no more important than the next guy/gal. If not, then we are seeking out "special" rights for ourselves that are not directly attributable to our service.
pbi said:...
I don't want to "play" any "card". I want to say that I believe recognizing people who sacrificed for their country trumps any other social cause I can think of. It looks like we agree on that point:
...
If you want to play the "sacrifice for country card" in this instance for poppy sales, then it goes without saying that supporting veterans groups and activities will always be the highest and only legitimate cause worthy of "anytime/anywhere" and to be "entitled to" special privledges over other groups no matter the policy of the Company at hand.
mover1 said:Sapplicant as a muslim who had to steal a poppy jar to feed my family McDondals I find your post refreshing.
Technoviking said:I don't want to be banned from this site, so I'll refrain from expressing what I feel about those people chanting "British troops burn in Hell".