Yikes. I just love how Mr Staples attempts to sell himself as "unbiased" WRT his recent testimony on the F35.
Mr Staples needs to accept that he is indeed very biased WRT all things military... Nothing wrong with being biased. We are all biased.
I also find it troubling that he is a "go-to-guy" for military matters within the MSM, especially when it is NOT noted that he is a co-founder for Ceasefire and an anti-military activist.
At Vimy Ridge "3,598 dead out of 10,602 Canadian casualties"(1). A single battle, still regarded as one of the most successful in history. When Sir Arthur Currie returned to Canada in 1919 "His visit to the House of Commons was met with a deafening silence and hissing from the gallery. Borden who is out of the country at the time, still waits four months to defend him against the vitriol of Sam Hughes' attacks, (that Currie had wasted Canadian lives), in the House. His attacks certainly did a lot to turn the Canadian public's thinking against Currie and there are those even today, who label him a butcher"(2).
We lost more soldiers at Vimy Ridge, than the entire Afghan war. Generals have always had to lobby on the backs of dead soldiers, in order to get the money, man power and equipment necessary to save lives.
If we scale down and under fund our military, with the everything winding down in Afghanistan. We will run into the same problems we had in the past.
>how to avoid a nuclear and military arms race in this delicate, environmentally sensitive region.
I suppose we could start by not deploying Canadian nukes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.