• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

RPAS (was JUSTAS): the project to buy armed Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) UAVs

@dimsum

I think you wrote this one.


1706922917352.png
F-16s and MQ-9s assigned to the 49th Wing lined the runway at Holloman AFB, creating an incredible display of airpower. USAF photo by Senior Airman Antonia Salfran
 
@dimsum

I think you wrote this one.


View attachment 82841
F-16s and MQ-9s assigned to the 49th Wing lined the runway at Holloman AFB, creating an incredible display of airpower. USAF photo by Senior Airman Antonia Salfran
I didn’t, but I agree with it.
 

so Comox, Greenwood and Ottawa?


Seems so.

The Canadian government announced in December it would acquire 11 of the armed drones, with three to be stationed in Comox and eight in Greenwood. All of the aircraft will be piloted remotely from a new ground control centre to be built on existing National Defence property in Ottawa
 
As initiatives like this draw more and more junior personnel into the NCR (eg Int support) there is a need for modern, affordable single quarters as well. Not a unique to the NCR issue, to be sure.
There is a metric boatload of raw land at the old CFB Ottawa site.

More RHUs?
 
Agreed. Nothing groundbreaking. But doctrinally developed to be substantially part of LSCO. Here's a hypothetical. If we had the SkyGuardians right now, would we be deploying a det to Latvia as part of our EfP? Here's where I have doubts. I think something a bit smaller and thought of more like a recce asset would be seen as more deployable in my opinion.
Moved this ongoing conversation to the RPAS thread.

My guess is that if we had MQ-9B now, it would support EfP in a similar way that USAF MQ-9A Reapers are used. They have the endurance not to require being based close to the EfP. Regardless, it’d be only the aircraft and techs deploying.

Another difference is that the MQ-9B would be able to self-deploy as it is cleared for non-segregated airspace, which other UAS aren’t at the moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ytz
I guess the debate is whether we would have been better off with a Hi-Lo mix of a HALE for domestic surveillance and a low end MALE for the armed reconnaissance mission or our current jack of all solution.
 
I guess the debate is whether we would have been better off with a Hi-Lo mix of a HALE for domestic surveillance and a low end MALE for the armed reconnaissance mission or our current jack of all solution.
I don’t think the govt of the day was ok with 2 new fleets of UAS. I’m surprised the MQ-9B was actually successful.
 
I don’t think the govt of the day was ok with 2 new fleets of UAS. I’m surprised the MQ-9B was actually successful.

Oh totally. But this is kinda the problem. We've taken so long with procurement that technology and doctrine has moved on. Same thing now with GBAD too.
 
Oh totally. But this is kinda the problem. We've taken so long with procurement that technology and doctrine has moved on. Same thing now with GBAD too.
…and MAISR…and GLLE…and…

We (current GoC) fiddle fart around so long trying to align with the polls and surveys as to what politicians think that Canadians are going to accept (and by ‘accept’ I mean still consider voting for the incumbent Gov’t)…so that by the time the calculus is finished in the data metrics, what was in play is now on the tail end of the contemporary capability space. Only on programs with much longer life-cycles does it sometimes actually look like it will work out (F-35, CSC) …
 
  • Like
Reactions: ytz
Oh totally. But this is kinda the problem. We've taken so long with procurement that technology and doctrine has moved on. Same thing now with GBAD too.
I get the feeling sometimes that the nameless mandarins in Ottawa consider that situation as a successful strategy.
 
I get the feeling sometimes that the nameless mandarins in Ottawa consider that situation as a successful strategy.

Blaming "nameless manadarins" is a great way for a whole bunch of politicians to escape accountability. Most of our procurement failures are a result of poor political choices than process and bureaucracy.
 
Blaming "nameless manadarins" is a great way for a whole bunch of politicians to escape accountability. Most of our procurement failures are a result of poor political choices than process and bureaucracy.
Process and bureaucracy also play a part.

glares at PSPC and ISED
 
Back
Top