Cui said:No, every candidate on BMOQ are expected to meet the same standard prescribed by the CF EXPRES.
OneMissionataTime said:For all those who are going infantry or want to be infantry; prepare for some pretty rigorous PT. Long-ruck marching, long distance running and a lot of bodyweight pyrometric workouts, (Push-ups, pull-ups and Up downs and planks.). Most of the lads on my TPs could crush a run 5k in 19 minutes and were equally impressive in muscular endurance (by Express standards 70 Push-ups non-stop; 70 sit-ups in a minute; 20 pull-ups). To lead the best you have too be the best, in all aspects.
canada94 said:Are Infantry applicant's during BMOQ held to a different standard then that of everyone else? Sorry if I am sounding trivial, this is a serious question!
Heff18 said:Here's my tip:
Every time you feel the need to check for updates, drop and give me 10!
That's 120 push-ups already today, good prep for Recruit Camp 8)
<<Edited to correct my glaring, although mildly amusing, error.>>
matthew1786 said:So reading through the entire ROTP 2011-2012 thread... I have decided to adopt this motto! :blotto:
Also, it is going to be quite amusing to see who will post about their bogus acceptance call on April 1st. ;D
scriptox said:Damn it.. you didn't have to bring up the April 1st thing.. way to ruin the fun ;D
matthew1786 said:For whoever has been following the budget reveal, it is most likely a very sad day for all of us here in this thread hoping for good news in mid April. Whatever money the CF had budgeted to expanding its regular force size from ~68k personnel to ~70k personnel was just thrown out the window. This means that selections will probably only be made to replace positions that open up, and that isn't even accounting for the 7200 government jobs being eliminated through attrition. This will also delay the selection process as they are most likely re-evaluating how many applicants are to be accepted.
crap just got a heck of a lot more competitive. It has been a pleasure gentlemen.
matthew1786 said:For whoever has been following the budget reveal, it is most likely a very sad day for all of us here in this thread hoping for good news in mid April. Whatever money the CF had budgeted to expanding its regular force size from ~68k personnel to ~70k personnel was just thrown out the window. This means that selections will probably only be made to replace positions that open up, and that isn't even accounting for the 7200 government jobs being eliminated through attrition. This will also delay the selection process as they are most likely re-evaluating how many applicants are to be accepted.
Things just got a heck of a lot more competitive. It has been a pleasure gentlemen.
Cui said:Now now, let's not speculate, and fuel further anxiety. I say that despite whatever news we hear, we should still hold our heads up and hope for the best. Let's not make assumptions about the situation. We'll hear about it when we hear about it. Be optimistic, who knows, maybe it will be one of those "glass half full" turnouts.
Don't give up hope.
I'm not sure the CF had any money budgeted for this. I'm not expert in these things, but about a week ago (so before the budget announcement) I heard a brief from the Chief of Air Staff where we were told that the manning level of ~68,000 would be maintained.matthew1786 said:. . . Whatever money the CF had budgeted to expanding its regular force size from ~68k personnel to ~70k personnel was just thrown out the window. . .