Grimaldus said:It's just how society is. Like 45 year old women lining up for Justin Bebier signed pictures (and going crazy over him) compared to 45 year old men lining up for Selena Gomez pictures. Same same but different ;D
CDN Aviator said:Don't be a hater......i would be in the line up to meet her.
Dimsum said:The porn star or Selena? Or both? :bowing:
Dimsum said:Or both?
Having glanced.....just momentarily ....at one of her videos (bless you Google), yes, she does seem to enjoy her work. :nod:jollyjacktar said:Nevertheless, I'll wager the former Secretary enjoys going to work nowadays.
Journeyman said:Having glanced.....just momentarily ....at one of her videos (bless you Google), yes, she does seem to enjoy her work. :nod:
I don't think she's quite ready to be a Volvo-driving soccer mom just yet.
Google the band, Everclear, pondering the philosophical question of where do all the porn stars go.Blackadder1916 said:Volvo?
Is this a typo?
Grimaldus said:How would the CF treat this?
It hits the news that Pte Candy who works for the Canadian Forces makes hardcore pornographic films. Would the CoC get involved or just ignore it? Would it be distracting in the world place or a non-issue?
To carry on the tangent, perhaps, and not related to any specific employment, but is having any second job supposed to go through the CoC? Pizza driver, stripper, whatever?ArmyVern said:Is it legal?
A friend of mine was once charged by the CF. She was a stripper after working hours. She won. Kingstonians may recall her. Hard to hold someone accountable for doing something 100 percent legal in this country and claim 'moral standards' when you choose not to hold the opposite sex who also wear the uniform accountable for their viewing the same stuff. If itès not OK for one to do, nor should it be good for the other to watch ... you know 'optics' and all that.
Technoviking said:To carry on the tangent, perhaps, and not related to any specific employment, but is having any second job supposed to go through the CoC? Pizza driver, stripper, whatever?
Technoviking said:but is having any second job supposed to go through the CoC? Pizza driver, stripper, whatever?
:rofl:ArmyVern said:Yes, you are correct. We have already had a CF member do the porn thing too. Perhaps you met him in Oka as I know you were there too ... >
19.42 – CIVIL EMPLOYMENT
(1) Subject to paragraph (3), no officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall engage in any civil employment or undertaking that in the opinion of the member’s commanding officer:
(a) is or is likely to be detrimental to the interests of the Canadian Forces;
(b) reflects or is likely to reflect discredit upon the Canadian Forces; or
(c) in the case of members of the Regular Force, is continuous.
(2) No officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall authorize the use of the member’s name or photograph in connection with a commercial product, except so far as the member’s name may be part of a firm name.
(3) Except that an officer or non-commissioned member shall not engage in any civil employment or undertaking that reflects or is likely to reflect discredit upon the Canadian Forces, this article does not apply to a member who is :
(a) on leave immediately preceding release; or
(b) on leave without pay.
ArmyVern said:Is it legal?
A friend of mine was once charged by the CF. She was a stripper after working hours. She won. Kingstonians may recall her. Hard to hold someone accountable for doing something 100 percent legal in this country and claim 'moral standards' when you choose not to hold the opposite sex who also wear the uniform accountable for their viewing the same stuff. If itès not OK for one to do, nor should it be good for the other to watch ... you know 'optics' and all that.
dangerboy said:It is in QR&O Vol 1, Art 19.42 - Civil Employment
(2) No officer or non-commissioned member on full-time service shall authorize the use of the member’s name or photograph in connection with a commercial product, except so far as the member’s name may be part of a firm name.