Or at least enforceable. We shall see in coming days and weeks whether the government thinks it can enforce this particular rule, and if so, whether the body politic is willing to go along with that.
My personal opinion, if 55,000 people decide to defy the illegality of a strike, I’m at a loss as to what enforcement mechanisms would be effective in solving the underlying problem. An enforcement focus basically means that the state will double down on the coercion. That’s a relatively linear path where the choices quickly narrow to withdrawal or further escalation, with few branches to other options. Will they try to enforce against individuals striking (eg fines)? Some unions are already saying the strikers won’t eat the cost, unions will cover it. Will they try to go after the union itself? That would quickly further inflame the ire of more of organized labour.
The social context is interesting. For the past couple years, the working class have arguably been becoming more conscious of their rights, of how they ought to be treated, and of collective action. Society has been so shaken up in the past couple years that there are a ton of fractures and divides. There’s a lot of distrust and disdain towards government at all levels. Here we have a conservative government (hardly beloved by the more activist demographics) going after workers that a lot of normal people can sympathize with. This isn’t the cops or firefighters or other high income professionals. Janitors, librarians, early childhood educators… These are relatively sympathetic individuals that are on the shit end of this stick, and the state’s trying to clawback essential labour rights. I really really hope the province takes a deep breath, sucks back, reassesses, and comes back to the table in good faith before this brews up further.