MJP
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 2,847
- Points
- 1,260
Cyrius007 said:they were re-issuing clothes to CF members much more often with bigger sizes than smaller ones...
I call that getting old....
Cyrius007 said:they were re-issuing clothes to CF members much more often with bigger sizes than smaller ones...
Rifleman62 said:Currently walk 9 to 10 KM @ 1 1/2 hour, 5/6 times a week.
Navy ID, hey? Must be something new.RectorCR said:I've been working as a bouncer here in Halifax for a little while now and most of the guys who show their Navy ID's tend to be quite "plump".
It's a cortisol-driven environment: lots of stress, lots of standing/waiting/staying alert, lots of deprivation of natural light and fresh air. Highly conducive to catabolism and central fat storage. It's physically demanding, but not in a way that makes you stronger or healthier.I've never worked in the navy so I'm not sure of the physical fitness required to do their job but it would seem like it isn't that high...at least in the ruck 30 km's with 50lbs on your back sort of way.
That's true. Not skinny, not fat. Solid and fit comes to mind, as one would expect of a Rifleman.Rifleman62 said:jollyjacktar:
Not fat, but not skinny! In those days I was running at least an hour a day at the YMCA track across the street from work.
medicineman said:What the study also sort of touched on was that the chain of command has to be involved more by making PT a priority as opposed to the embuggerance a lot of folks make it out to be. I've been (and still am) utterly amazed at how many low level supervisors take it upon themselves to decide the routine work that never goes away to be "operational necessity" and who make PT a reward vice part of the work day, despite CO and CDS ORDER's requiring their subordinates to train at least 3 times a week on compnay time...and the leaders that let these people get away with disobeying those same orders. I know PT is a personal responsibility, but it's also a work one - as a leader, you have to know what the lowest common denominator in your unit is and raise that to something operational. Also, group PT gets you out there and learning about your folks, allows you to give them leadership challenges, burn off steam, etc, ad nauseum. While I know I'm generally preaching to the choir here, there are still folks out there that feel the CF is a 9-5 job and PT is but a burden to their work/career advancement agendae.
Rant over.
MM
Eye In The Sky said:This.
IMO, fitness is a leadership/command responsibility is it not? So when Pte/OS Bloggins doesn't pass his/her PT test, how come only they are held to account and not their CofC from the CO on down? The CDS Guidance to COs is pretty clear on PT and so is the DAOD.
MCG said:As a step toward establishing a better culture of fitness, perhaps we should stop cutting PT time from courses as a way to compress training. Anything longer than 7 consecutive days should be mandated to include fitness time.
You mean like this:http://www.outofregs.com/index.php?page=archives&id=95Hatchet Man said:And the CADPAT OTW shirts leave nothing to the imagination, and it is quite frankly embarrassing to see all these individuals running around here on KAIA wearing those things, and proudly displaying well developed beer guts, and moobs. It seems its more for the LCF than anything else, since none of the other nations here wear their OTW shirts 24/7.
ModlrMike said:Exactly.
The comment in the article that "soldiers do one hour of PT every day" is essentially true in so much as it relates to brigade units. There's still plenty of other folks out there who don't get this PT time., and are told that they should do PT on their own time. What we need to do is inculcate a culture of fitness in the CF. A culture that starts at the top, but also starts from day 1 of a person's career and carries on until retirement.
I recollect doing predeployment training at a US base one tour and virtually every single soldier was doing PT first thing in the morning.
As long as the fitness points are based on measurable/quantifiable performance in a fitness test, there is no room for personalities to influence those points.GAP said:Do you not get into personalities doing the scoring then?
Infanteer said:We need to move beyond "Well the CDS said" and "DAOD says this" and make real incentives. The US Military scores the annual PT test. Meet the minimum standard, and you get minimum points, max the test, you get max points.
PERs are moving to a simple system - pass FORCE and you get to go to a merit board, don't pass and you aren't looked at. This isn't good enough. We need a system where FORCE failures are put on the administrative track, FORCE minimums get 1 point on their PER and some graded score can allow members who surpass the standard to get 2 to a maximum of 5 points on the PER. What's a better incentive to promote a fitness culture then having COs who enforce a standard having all their guys getting 4-5 points at merit boards while less dedicated units are getting 1-2?
Tie fitness to promotions, money and career advancement and you'll see a cultural shift in the CAF.
Why you gotta point me out like that? And besides, my surf board has cool things like post-it notes, paperclips and a high spead stamp with my signature block on it.RoyalDrew said:...the culture of the coffee slurping, cigarette smoking, desk surfer!
How is promotion not tied to fitness? If you haven't passed the fit test, you can't get promoted. If you can't pass it after repeated attempts, you get released. They won't release you over a second language profile.RoyalDrew said:Great suggestion, I actually find it kind of funny that fitness is not tied to our promotion schemes yet things which have very little impact on our ability to fight wars like French proficiency and having multiple graduate degrees gives a person big time points. Education is definitely important, especially at the higher levels of the officer corps but should the ability to function in both languages be held at a higher importance then physical fitness?