- Reaction score
- 9,942
- Points
- 1,360
Technoviking said:Re: your first point. YES! After all, what people want is to go home.
This leads to number 2. Let Assad do it. With Russian, Iranian and Hezbollah help. We can watch for leakers and nail them.
I agree with you. We need to bring Assad back in to the fold again, this is something I've been convinced of well before these events happened. Assad isn't our friend but his Regime is secular (or at least was before we screwed it all up). The guys he is fighting are ISIS and Al Qaeda, they are not our friends and we shouldn't be supporting them. I'm all for an unholy alliance if it means sending those guys to get their 78 virgins.
Let Assad, along with Russian support concentrate on "La Syrie Utile" and we can focus on working the periphery. The Kurds and Shiites can decide amongst themselves what to do with the rest of Iraq and Assad and the YPG can come to some sort of power sharing agreement in Northern Syria, with Turkish approval of course.
Western Special Forces should be inserted in to the deserts of Syria and Iraq to wreak havoc on ISIS lines of communication and supply. No holding ground, just unrestricted raiding and pillaging. The other parties can mop up what's left.
Edit:
PPCLI Guy does bring up a very good point though:
PPCLI Guy said:Here's a counter narrative for you on the whole refugee / migrant front.
1) By some counts, there are 11M people who have made the decision that having their families barrel bombed by their own government is a bad idea, and have decided to leave (I do not trust those numbers).
2) Assad reinstated the mandatory service clause for all "fighting aged males" in the Spring, asking people to contribute to the bombing of their own homes and families
3) The people on the move could have walked 150 miles to Raqqah to join the Caliphate. Instead, they walked 1500 miles to Rotterdam or 2500 miles to Rouen - and then on to Regina.
I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
We have radicals here (in the West) now. They are either home-grown or plants - likely the former, as the latter requires a degree of sophistication so far lacking in ISIL tactics - it is so much easier to turn someone in place, than to train and dispatch them. Either way, we have mechanisms and institutions charged with protecting us from that threat. So far, they have done a bloody good job.
I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt as well.
Alternatively, we could close our borders, harden our hearts to the suffering of others, forgo all civil liberties, and be very safe.
That is not the Canada I wish to serve.
In light of this I'm willing the change my opinion that we should seal off the border completely; however, my point #2 still stands.