A superpower nation that does nothing about boasting about their technology and satellites didn't see the mean terrorists move highly radioactive war heads out of the country? I think some one must have been asleep at the security monitor then?
It's a big world out there, and it's hard to track every single truck in Iraq. Do you honestly believe that US intelligence is that exact?
Maybe that's why they are no more WMD's in Iraq...because he shipped them all away!
Why not? I would venture Syria to be a good starting point. He's clearly demonstrated that he's had WMD by
using them before; do you think a dictator just up and listened to the UN, that aegis of Canadian values, and decided to get rid of his WMDs?
Then why launch the war on Iraq when they have no more WMD's? Where are they? We better go and attack the other countries that bought these weapons and components off Saddam now shouldn't we! Where does it end?
If you're sending men to die in a war that has a major emphases on WMD's you better be sure they are there or otherwise you end up looking pretty silly wouldn't you say? I believe that's why there's a huge investigation being launched on the CIA and FBI to find out where they got this intelligence that launched the entire war on this shoddy intell.
Disarming a tinpot dictator of his NBC capabilities in a region of strategic interest for the West was one of the many reasons for invading Iraq; the presence of WMD's and their no-show for the Coalition have simply been in the media spotlight due to the headlines it can provide for those opposed to the current administration.
As for Infateer, You haven't answered my previous question. Are you stalling?
What question, that vague little quip you threw at the end of one of your blustering statements about what I felt Canadian values were? I figured it to be rhetorical, since it was so wide open and didn't really pertain to the debate enough to warrant the effort. Do you think a system of universal health insurance is one of the reasons we decided to man the post at the UN and tell the Americans they were on their own?
Not only that, you just shred my posts apart and don't seem do anything else? Where's YOUR proof other then your witty little sarcastic remarks?
I simply reply to the innaccurate and unfounded statements that you seem to insist on repeatedly telling us. As others may attest, I've stated my position more than enough times, and don't feel I have to give an explanation to every kid who comes here trumpeting "UN, BUSH LIED, AMERICA SUCKS!!!" because it happens quite frequently.
Furthermore, it would be nice to hear what you think as oppose to your one liners that just state â Å“you are wrong,â ? how am I wrong? Shut me up and enlighten me because you're not doing a very good job at voicing your argument properly. At least other people who disagree write more then just a sentence stating that I'm wrong with some substance.
Ask and ye shall receive. So far, you've just recycled some silly point about sticking with the UN, which
nobody has agreed with. Since your obviously not doing well in debating the matter, put forward a topic that pertains to the debate at hand (which appears to be Canada's interests in the UN as opposed to the US).
As for my name, I think No Mercy fits me as I have done nothing but consistently argue and bitch at my point.
Yeah, I noticed the argue and bitch part, but I think I side with Bruce when I say I'm still looking for your point. Maybe Pte NoPoint or Pte Hotair would be apt. Try and provide evidence to back up your claims, because the fact that
no one here has yet to agree with you should maybe tell you that your running on fumes.
Ether you're very ignorant or unable to see the fact that I have demonstrated a very realistic overview of the situation and given many points to consider.
Sure. If all you can do to respond to my criticism of your theory is to label me ignorant and unaware of your true understanding, go ahead; I think you got a future career in the UN secured.