• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Military Police roles/org: now vs. C Prov Corps days (split thread)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jollyjacktar
  • Start date Start date
Now that's funny. No it wasn't.

But by chance my NSE guy par takes in this site ( as I just found out yesterday).

I don't remember any Smiths. You couldn't swing a stick without hitting a Caron though.
 
WeatherdoG said:
It might mean a few less MPs get to switch over to local police after their mandatory service, but it on the surface looks like a wiser path...

How common is that? I read here ( the post was five years ago ) that the RCMP, Calgary and Halifax accept MPs for lateral entry. Have things changed / improved since then? :

http://army.ca/forums/threads/83404/post-805253.html#msg805253


 
WeatherdoG said:
There is an interesting point in here that I think needs to be the key point when discussing the merits of a small m capital P (mP) service in the CF. Investigation experience, and frequency... Do we as the CAF need to spend the time and money to train MPs to the level of civilian police forces when they in the normal execution of their duties will deal with disciplinary investigations for minor drug use and traffic violations? Would our training time and budget not be better spent on having MPs who are trained mostly in security, POW handling, Convoy Ops, etc.. and have a few RCMP members seconded to the CAF to fill the role of the NIS, and to conduct investigations of a serious nature? It seems to me that having a few experts from the RCMP and a general body of well trained capital M small p (Mp) MPs might be the better choice for quality investigations, as well as preparing the CAF for any possible theatre of war. It might mean a few less MPs get to switch over to local police after their mandatory service, but it on the surface looks like a wiser path...

Some benefits that would also certainly follow if small units of RCMP were on attachment with the CAF ( at larger bases and the NIS) above the odd one that happens now.

Closer, more user friendly access to associated RCMP support sections. Often at a better cost ratio than what it would be for the CF to provide. Collision reconstructionists, Forensic Ident, Polygraph, Police Dog Service to name a few.

Again closer, more user friendly interoperability to RCMP Detachments (850 ish) across Canada.

A vast pool of regular members (about 20,000. with a huge cross section of expertise) who would be available on short attachments (1 day to 1 year) as needs arouse or on longer attachments (1 year plus) to bring a robust amount of diverse current operational experience in investigative areas.

Lastly a perception of non bias in any investigation. Although well schooled and respectful of the use of the chain of command. RCMP members would also not be under the influence of local commanders and it would be hard for CF members or the public to substantiate command influence.

The RCMP has fulfilled this same style of role with many other agencies, Federal and Provincial as well as a number of First Nations Policing Services.

Just thoughts
 
mariomike said:
How common is that? I read here ( the post was five years ago ) that the RCMP, Calgary and Halifax accept MPs for lateral entry. Have things changed / improved since then? :

http://army.ca/forums/threads/83404/post-805253.html#msg805253

Last I heard the RCMP still does. Also credits up to five years towards promotion after 2 years RCMP service. Case by case basis. 

Unless I missed an email in the last few months.
 
Alberta Bound said:
Last I heard the RCMP still does. Also credits up to five years towards promotion after 2 years RCMP service. Case by case basis. 

Unless I missed an email in the last few months.

It looks like the RCMP still does: "We regularly seek experienced police officers for vacancies across Canada (including Canadian Forces Military Police trained after the year 2000)."
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/recruiting-recrutement/rec/lateral-eng.htm
 
Alberta Bound said:
Mike (my B in L)( a TF 1-09 type). If you are reading this. I also liked the occasional medic. Not many. But a couple. Lol.

And to the rest. You have my undying gratitude for your service.


Actually it was TF 1-08 OMLT, I had some time for the CIVPOL, well except for the numpty who spent 6 months teaching CPR to the ANP and ANCOP.  :)
 
Back
Top