- Reaction score
- 9,944
- Points
- 1,360
This commentary on tattoos is humorous. The tattoo in question was most certainly not hateful conduct. What it was is a violation of CAF policy on tattoos which is why the CAF asked the member to have it covered.
What I'm most worried about is your fellow Officer's inability to interpret and apply policy. I shudder to think of them dealing with actual complex personnel issues.
As for tattoos in general, they can and do look great on people. My wife has 23 tattoos, including a full sleeve and an entire leg piece done. She was a punk rocker girl before and her best friend is professional tattoo artist. Gals with tattoos are fun . I especially like bringing my wife to mess functions to watch certain individuals have a conniption.
As for work, it isn't an issue and she works for a Big 5 Bank (about the most conservative place you could work). She covers her arms up and dresses professionally when dealing with customers to maintain the image of the Bank but that's it.
I always find these discussion funny, especially at work. It allows me to discover who the squares who live under a rock are.
What I'm most worried about is your fellow Officer's inability to interpret and apply policy. I shudder to think of them dealing with actual complex personnel issues.
As for tattoos in general, they can and do look great on people. My wife has 23 tattoos, including a full sleeve and an entire leg piece done. She was a punk rocker girl before and her best friend is professional tattoo artist. Gals with tattoos are fun . I especially like bringing my wife to mess functions to watch certain individuals have a conniption.
As for work, it isn't an issue and she works for a Big 5 Bank (about the most conservative place you could work). She covers her arms up and dresses professionally when dealing with customers to maintain the image of the Bank but that's it.
I always find these discussion funny, especially at work. It allows me to discover who the squares who live under a rock are.