• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

LPC leadership race - 2025

This is hypocricy of the highest level, from a report in Dec 23:


Key point:

Particularly concerning is the role of Brookfield Asset Management Chair and Head of Transition Investing Mark Carney, a prominent former central banker. Despite being a prominent advocate for financial sector commitments to net-zero targets, including acting as Co-Chair of the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), Carney oversees investment decisions that starkly contrast with sustainable and transparent practices.​
“Brookfield embodies the definition of greenwashing,” said Amanda Mendoza, Senior Climate Campaign and Research Coordinator at PESP. “BAM chair Mark Carney has frequently called on the financial industry to disclose emissions and decarbonize its dirtiest emitters, and is likely bringing this same message to the COP28 climate conference right now. Carney’s own firm refuses to transition completely away from fossil fuels, and the firm has deliberately omitted its dirtiest investments from its disclosures. Brookfield cannot continue to enjoy outsized profits while shirking the environmental consequences of its own fossil fuels investments. Mark Carney and Brookfield must lead by example: disclose all of the firm’s emissions and clean up its energy portfolio.”​
 
more details by the globe

not suspicious at all
One of the sources said Liberal Party lawyer Alexis Levine questioned why six couples donated to the campaign using the same credit card. The party asked the 12 individuals to sign attestation forms that they have joint bank accounts, the source said.
 
Looking like more and more irregularities.

It won’t go over well if conservatives are actually involved…
 
I don't give a fuck if they had to make payroll or ran a successful lemonade stand: Can they govern?

I ask that in every sense of the word; do they know how our system of governance works, the Charter, the division of powers within the BNA, what their responsibilities are domestically and internationally, how their power is shaped within a constitutional monarchy, how to be a strong leader who can show humility and shift policy to address national concerns or interest.

We tried the "not a career politician" gimmick for almost 10 years and it fucked us over in multiple avenues. We're seeing down south how dangerous it is to have business folks take the reigns and run government like a hostile takeover.

I personally want to see someone lead Canada who knows what the fuck that actually means and what the impacts are if they screw it up.

In both cases, Carney and Poilievre need to work harder to convince me on that last point.
Keeping an outfit like Goldman Sachs on stable, profitable track, and then running two central banks, seems like it might be as close to governing, especially in the setting described in your second para, as you can get without being in government. Certainly more of a recommendation than the "move fast and break things" or crazed vulture capital approaches. I expect a person with that background will understand things like redundancy, reserve capacity, and be accustomed to dealing with handling information from a wide range of sources. The novel part will be making policy decisions to impact fields wildly outside his own, rather than using information from those fields to make policy decisions within his own specialty.

Just laying out my own musings more than anything.
 
more details by the globe

not suspicious at all
Exactly! That could be a crazy Indocanadian flop house with who knows what’s going on.

Other candidates have established publicly their clear separation from foreign influence…at least four degrees…errr, well…four people of separation from dictatorial foreign influence, whether it’s New Delhi, Moscow or even Beijing… 👍🏼
IMG_5755.jpeg
 
Exactly! That could be a crazy Indocanadian flop house with who knows what’s going on.

Other candidates have established publicly their clear separation from foreign influence…at least four degrees…errr, well…four people of separation from dictatorial foreign influence, whether it’s New Delhi, Moscow or even Beijing… 👍🏼
View attachment 91462
I'm surprised at the very Western, other than the painting, design motif, especially as the place looks too new to be a Soviet-inspired Palace of Proletarian Governance or whatever.
 
Keeping an outfit like Goldman Sachs on stable, profitable track, and then running two central banks, seems like it might be as close to governing, especially in the setting described in your second para, as you can get without being in government. Certainly more of a recommendation than the "move fast and break things" or crazed vulture capital approaches. I expect a person with that background will understand things like redundancy, reserve capacity, and be accustomed to dealing with handling information from a wide range of sources. The novel part will be making policy decisions to impact fields wildly outside his own, rather than using information from those fields to make policy decisions within his own specialty.

Just laying out my own musings more than anything.
If it wasn’t for Beijing’s interference with Freeland (indicating that Carney is Beijing’s guy), all the dodgy staffers from the PMO working for him and his advocacy for green tariffs that are completely unworkable, Carney would almost be a good candidate.

Unfortunately, he does have the perception of being a grown-up and a “money guy” so a lot of people are just going with that.
 
Back
Top