- Reaction score
- 1,025
- Points
- 1,160
ArmyVern said:The Navy had this same issue 22 years ago when I served with them wrt tossing people on duty when they were already on authorized leave during the holiday period. The tendancy by them to actually include a statement on a "CF 100 LEAVE AUTHORIZATION" (that IS it's official name!!) denoting that the mbr themselves needs to find a replacement if they get tossed on duty after that same said leave pass is signed as "authorized leave beginning on date X and ending on date Y" ... tells me that this is systemic wrt the HMCS that we are talking about and that, despite growing older, they haven't moved very far forward wrt this particular issue.
Its obvious that when you did serve with the navy 22 years ago you're experience with them was less than ideal, I assure you that most ships do not fuc*k over the mbr. We're taking this kid to his word that this actually happened. In my experience what he/she said and what actually happened is often quite different. If this did indeed happen fine, it looks like Pat in Halifax has looked into this and probably has it straightened out. I'm sure bone head things do not only happen in the navy and is not a reflection of the navy as a whole.